LeBron James

LeBron James — CS2 Stats

US76561198179109730[U:1:218844002]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,656Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,409Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,100Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30210 of 251249 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,555 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,100 -535 18 Aug – 8 Oct · 18 days played
22,82324,744peak 24,74418 Aug8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,555 +0 2 Sept – 3 Sept · 2 observations
1,5551,555peak 1,5552 Sept3 Sept
24,955Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,555Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,555
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 196 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 644 below peak (24,744)
  • +1,173 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 900 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.4%48.2%50.9%2.6% short
Shot accuracy11.9%13.3%13.7%1.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.071.09meets
Match win rate44.2%46.9%48.4%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeBron JamesFACEITLevel 9 · 1,555 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,100 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,555csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning60
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.0
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 15 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · italy, 7 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 21 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 20mirageWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2110–1148%-0.00
cacheA2011–955%0.00
anubisB189–950%-0.00
mirageC145–936%-0.02
dust2B63–350%0.03
ancient—42–250%0.02
overpass—32–167%-0.00
poseidon—20–20%-0.16
eldorado—21–150%0.04
nuke—21–150%0.09
italy—21–150%-0.06
office—20–20%-0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.01
train—11–0100%0.15
debris—11–0100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

159,422Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8,312Matches
44.2%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11.9%Shot accuracy
16,092MVPs
3,238Hours (in match)
4,166Bombs planted
1,906Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,480
AWP10,719
MAC-106,025
MP95,612
P905,046

Lifetime map wins

11,545inferno
7,615dust2
5,141nuke
2,355office
2,052vertigo
1,759train
1,323assault
897lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

351Matches
54%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
74.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6957%0.9514.0
Mirage5749%0.8914.3
Dust25163%0.8613.3
Anubis5149%0.9015.1
Cache4360%0.9815.7
Overpass2236%0.8315.6
Ancient1856%1.1715.2
Nuke1118%0.7913.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
560msReaction time
67.8%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
11.61HE damage / grenade
5.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.3124% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–60.1530%9 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0818%8 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0010%8 Oct →
cache9–00.0918%8 Oct →
anubis14–160.0215%8 Oct →
overpass7–9-0.1219%8 Oct →
poseidon2–9-0.199%8 Oct →
cache13–50.0423%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.1012%1 Oct →
anubis13–100.028%1 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0312%29 Sept →
eldorado4–9-0.0921%28 Sept →
overpass9–70.1113%28 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.0613%28 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1516%28 Sept →
cache15–150.0218%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0325%26 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0314%26 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0227%20 Sept →
inferno13–20.0525%20 Sept →
inferno13–110.0523%20 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0125%20 Sept →
anubis13–70.0411%20 Sept →
debris9–30.1425%15 Sept →
nuke9–10.2415%15 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1410%15 Sept →
overpass9–60.0012%15 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0320%15 Sept →
eldorado9–70.1814%15 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0216%11 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0528%11 Sept →
inferno13–110.0416%11 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0115%11 Sept →
mirage13–70.0625%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0120%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0118%10 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0032%9 Sept →
inferno6–10.0924%9 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0116%8 Sept →
anubis10–130.0111%8 Sept →
italy6–13-0.0613%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0318%7 Sept →
italy13–9-0.0767%7 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0217%6 Sept →
cache11–130.0018%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.0413%6 Sept →
inferno10–130.0017%3 Sept →
inferno13–60.0119%3 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0215%3 Sept →
inferno15–150.0525%2 Sept →
office8–130.0343%2 Sept →
office10–13-0.0515%2 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0532%1 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0510%1 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0032%1 Sept →
mirage2–70.025%30 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0717%30 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.048%30 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0119%29 Aug →
ancient13–60.0511%29 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0114%29 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0118%29 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0316%29 Aug →
cache13–10.0217%29 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0321%29 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0614%28 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0614%28 Aug →
cache15–150.0116%28 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0115%28 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0316%28 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0713%25 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0220%24 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0113%24 Aug →
anubis13–160.0817%23 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0511%23 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0613%23 Aug →
cache13–10.0513%23 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0510%23 Aug →
cache13–40.0624%23 Aug →
dust26–130.0010%23 Aug →
dust213–00.1736%21 Aug →
inferno16–120.0218%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0319%21 Aug →
inferno13–20.0016%21 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0143%21 Aug →
cache13–100.0218%21 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0314%20 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0313%20 Aug →
dust213–90.0720%20 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.029%20 Aug →
ancient13–40.0718%18 Aug →
cache6–130.0210%18 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0311%18 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.058%18 Aug →
anubis13–110.0222%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0223%18 Aug →
anubis22–19-0.0119%17 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0119%17 Aug →
cache13–70.059%17 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0017%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.