AzraelsCatharsis

AzraelsCatharsis — CS2 Stats

US76561198262032385[U:1:301766657]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,152Tracked matches26%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,084Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+15Tracked matches · now 1,152
−2.1ppWin rate · 28.0% → 25.9%

Rating over time

37Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches25——
Win rate32%——
K/D0.66——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate47.2%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.3%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.740.980.990.25 short
Match win rate42.8%43.3%43.9%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAzraelsCatharsisFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning45
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36–57–7Last 10036%Win rateLWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −112ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time594ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–6 · vertigo, 14 Aug →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · office, 18 Aug →
383msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · boulder, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 7% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D151–147%-0.05
ancientD133–1023%-0.05
infernoB136–746%-0.02
nukeD134–931%-0.04
officeD124–833%-0.01
mirageA127–558%-0.02
vertigoS75–271%0.05
anubisD51–420%-0.05
cache—30–30%-0.05
boulder—32–167%-0.06
poseidon—33–0100%0.03
train—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (7% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,689Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
1,474Matches
42.8%Match win rate
47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,377MVPs
507Hours (in match)
1,290Bombs planted
323Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-474,370
SSG 083,243
AWP1,705
P90260
Nova255
HE Grenade217

Lifetime map wins

3,358dust2
1,643office
1,375inferno
1,365nuke
821vertigo
250train
32italy
4lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
50%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
57.1ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%0.549.8
Cache4100%0.9213.0
Inferno30%0.355.0
Ancient20%0.528.5
Dust2250%1.0615.0
Nuke1100%0.8320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
570msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
6.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.479 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.919% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

7% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0721%24 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0326%23 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0914%21 Sept →
office7–13-0.0126%18 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0117%18 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0116%17 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1318%17 Sept →
inferno13–30.0316%17 Sept →
train5–13-0.0833%17 Sept →
ancient13–100.0215%15 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0910%14 Sept →
mirage8–6-0.0230%14 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0416%13 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0416%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.0217%9 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0413%8 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0416%7 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0829%6 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0913%6 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.037%5 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0130%5 Sept →
office10–13-0.0029%5 Sept →
office7–13-0.0423%2 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0626%1 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0224%1 Sept →
ancient12–12-0.0325%1 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0430%1 Sept →
ancient4–12-0.0829%30 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0213%30 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0611%30 Aug →
boulder12–12-0.0520%29 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0217%29 Aug →
nuke10–130.0325%28 Aug →
office10–13-0.0213%28 Aug →
boulder13–00.000%27 Aug →
inferno13–10.0850%26 Aug →
dust212–120.0014%26 Aug →
anubis1–130.029%25 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0840%25 Aug →
office13–9-0.023%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0912%24 Aug →
vertigo4–9-0.0019%21 Aug →
nuke9–6-0.013%21 Aug →
inferno6–90.0532%21 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0526%21 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0613%21 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.1016%19 Aug →
office6–13-0.1319%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0212%19 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0711%19 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.1113%18 Aug →
vertigo13–3-0.0117%18 Aug →
office12–12-0.0260%18 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0020%18 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0916%17 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0112%17 Aug →
mirage13–110.0025%17 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.054%17 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0821%17 Aug →
dust213–10.0050%17 Aug →
ancient12–3-0.0333%17 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0613%17 Aug →
boulder3–1-0.130%17 Aug →
nuke13–20.0021%16 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.1612%16 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0717%16 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.1113%16 Aug →
poseidon9–60.0022%15 Aug →
inferno9–2-0.0414%15 Aug →
poseidon9–50.1326%15 Aug →
vertigo9–60.1814%15 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.1313%15 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1812%15 Aug →
office9–130.0334%15 Aug →
office10–13-0.0230%15 Aug →
office13–40.1339%15 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0125%15 Aug →
inferno13–110.0022%14 Aug →
ancient11–130.0214%14 Aug →
poseidon9–6-0.0410%14 Aug →
inferno9–50.2011%14 Aug →
nuke9–70.114%14 Aug →
vertigo9–60.2121%14 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0023%13 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0960%12 Aug →
dust20–13-0.130%12 Aug →
office13–7-0.058%12 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0414%12 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0522%12 Aug →
mirage13–20.0322%11 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0022%11 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.1020%11 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0616%10 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0412%10 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0423%10 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.1013%9 Aug →
office13–10.0220%9 Aug →
mirage13–50.0217%8 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0431%8 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0829%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.