Flo

Flo — CS2 Stats

DE76561198250637848[U:1:290372120]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,660Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,491Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,792Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41517 of 230582 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,641 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 23 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,792 +7,127 20 Mar19 Sept · 21 days played
15,00022,792peak 22,79220 Mar19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,641 +0 2 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,6411,641peak 1,6412 Sept3 Sept
23,178Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,641Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-01-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,641
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,792
  • +829 over 30 days · improving
  • +7,792 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,208 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate34.6%46.8%48.3%13.7% short
Shot accuracy16.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.931.061.070.14 short
Match win rate44.8%46.3%46.9%2.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFloFACEITLevel 8 · 1,641 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,792 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,641csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLWLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.8pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time533ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 9–13 · cache, 13 Aug
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 19 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 19 Sept
13–1Biggest win · alpine, 25 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
28In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC24101442%-0.03
ancientC1971237%-0.02
cacheC167944%-0.02
anubisS128467%-0.01
nukeA116555%-0.04
overpassB115645%-0.04
dust23030%-0.00
mirage32167%-0.02
alpine110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,162Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
6,678Matches
44.8%Match win rate
34.6%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
14,337MVPs
3,011Hours (in match)
6,916Bombs planted
1,630Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,463
AWP20,614
P2503,539
SSG 082,846
MP92,411
MAC-102,239

Lifetime map wins

12,637inferno
6,613dust2
5,735vertigo
3,346nuke
2,940train
1,266cbble
812lake
556office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

901Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.4ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4255%0.8813.4
Vertigo3339%0.8013.3
Inferno2552%0.7612.7
Nuke1828%0.7212.6
Iris1283%1.1615.0
Biome12100%1.1613.0
Thera989%1.1612.4
Rio de Janeiro667%1.1413.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
6.8°Preaim
539msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
11.63HE damage / grenade
3.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9382 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0321%19 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0617%19 Sept
cache13–30.0520%19 Sept
nuke13–100.0034%19 Sept
inferno8–130.0130%12 Sept
anubis13–5-0.079%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0114%12 Sept
anubis13–40.0427%12 Sept
cache15–15-0.0411%12 Sept
nuke3–13-0.029%11 Sept
cache15–150.0211%11 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0214%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0513%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.108%28 Aug
inferno13–9-0.069%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.0315%28 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0317%24 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0312%24 Aug
cache13–80.0320%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0615%24 Aug
inferno16–13-0.046%21 Aug
inferno13–40.0024%21 Aug
ancient7–130.0217%21 Aug
cache15–15-0.0714%21 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0011%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0021%18 Aug
cache13–9-0.0017%18 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0223%18 Aug
inferno0–4-0.090%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.073%15 Aug
cache9–130.0715%13 Aug
ancient16–13-0.026%13 Aug
cache13–60.0120%13 Aug
cache11–13-0.0712%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0420%12 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0215%12 Aug
inferno13–40.0119%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0113%12 Aug
inferno13–90.0016%12 Aug
anubis13–8-0.048%25 Jul
ancient6–13-0.025%25 Jul
cache13–8-0.0318%25 Jul
cache13–5-0.058%25 Jul
inferno13–90.0517%25 Jul
cache13–16-0.028%25 Jul
ancient13–70.0313%25 Jul
inferno10–13-0.066%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.079%4 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0316%4 Jul
cache12–12-0.0214%23 May
inferno10–13-0.048%25 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0315%18 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0713%18 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0223%18 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0710%11 Apr
anubis10–130.027%11 Apr
ancient9–130.018%11 Apr
overpass14–16-0.028%11 Apr
inferno14–16-0.086%4 Apr
ancient2–130.0419%4 Apr
inferno8–13-0.029%4 Apr
overpass13–9-0.019%4 Apr
mirage7–13-0.035%4 Apr
inferno4–13-0.110%3 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0510%2 Apr
inferno13–10-0.018%2 Apr
dust215–150.0121%2 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0019%26 Mar
overpass13–10-0.024%26 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0415%26 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0418%26 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0633%26 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0415%26 Mar
mirage13–10-0.049%26 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0313%20 Mar
nuke11–13-0.098%20 Mar
inferno10–13-0.065%20 Mar
nuke13–11-0.067%20 Mar
nuke14–160.049%8 Mar
dust23–13-0.0114%6 Mar
inferno2–13-0.1019%6 Mar
ancient13–9-0.026%6 Mar
overpass4–13-0.146%28 Feb
nuke7–13-0.1229%28 Feb
overpass11–13-0.028%20 Feb
ancient8–130.018%20 Feb
ancient0–2-0.090%20 Feb
inferno13–50.063%20 Feb
inferno8–13-0.029%14 Feb
anubis3–13-0.029%14 Feb
ancient11–130.0310%31 Jan
ancient13–70.0416%31 Jan
anubis9–130.0217%31 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0219%31 Jan
alpine13–10.0527%25 Jan
overpass13–60.0520%25 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0513%24 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0211%24 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0722%23 Jan
anubis16–12-0.0112%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →