XENO

XENO — CS2 Stats

76561198245931332[U:1:285665604]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,115Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,065Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,982Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70205 of 259985 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,970 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,982 -1,949 24 Aug – 4 Nov · 19 days played
20,18923,340peak 23,34024 Aug4 Nov
23,340Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,970Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-08-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,970
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 31 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,358 below peak (23,340)
  • -1,014 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,018 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.9%48.2%50.9%7.1% short
Shot accuracy9.7%13.2%13.7%4.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.361.071.09above
Match win rate53.6%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXENOFACEITLevel 9 · 1,970 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,982 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,970csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning77
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWLLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.0
Positioning7.7
Opening Duels6.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 79% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 79% on T to 58% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels8.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time496ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 7 Sept →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 7 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 17–19 · ancient, 19 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 23ancientWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2918–1162%0.03
infernoS2315–865%0.02
dust2B2211–1150%0.00
mirageC114–736%0.01
ancientD60–60%-0.00
nukeD51–420%-0.03
cache—21–150%-0.07
vertigo—10–10%-0.08
poseidon—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,986Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
3,761Matches
53.6%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
43.9%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
12,495MVPs
1,410Hours (in match)
5,090Bombs planted
902Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,502
AWP12,991
Tec-91,975
MP71,340
MAC-101,053

Lifetime map wins

7,886inferno
2,105dust2
1,813nuke
1,386cbble
985vertigo
479train
413italy
120lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

385Matches
55%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
89.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6169%1.4919.3
Anubis5765%1.4618.3
Ancient4146%1.2420.0
Dust22348%1.2920.9
Mirage2050%1.3818.5
Nuke944%1.2016.7
Vertigo743%1.4323.4
Overpass425%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
494msReaction time
78.5%T opening success
57.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.25HE damage / grenade
5.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–5-0.0413%4 Nov →
dust210–13-0.017%4 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0721%2 Nov →
inferno13–40.0712%2 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0327%2 Nov →
mirage13–80.0720%2 Nov →
dust216–13-0.048%29 Oct →
inferno13–100.0727%29 Oct →
anubis13–40.0625%28 Oct →
inferno13–80.0521%28 Oct →
dust212–160.0324%28 Oct →
nuke14–160.0215%26 Oct →
anubis13–90.106%26 Oct →
dust216–140.0224%25 Oct →
vertigo4–9-0.0816%24 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.1220%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0426%24 Oct →
mirage6–130.026%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0220%23 Oct →
anubis11–130.0217%23 Oct →
anubis13–90.0619%23 Oct →
mirage16–140.0526%21 Oct →
dust211–130.027%21 Oct →
anubis13–50.079%21 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.0111%19 Oct →
dust213–40.0514%19 Oct →
anubis13–70.0622%19 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0616%19 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0311%18 Oct →
ancient13–160.0325%18 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.064%17 Oct →
anubis13–100.035%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.087%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.0423%15 Oct →
ancient5–130.0217%15 Oct →
anubis14–160.049%14 Oct →
inferno7–130.0415%14 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.036%12 Oct →
inferno13–70.0312%12 Oct →
anubis13–100.0224%12 Oct →
inferno13–110.0115%9 Oct →
inferno13–50.0811%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0316%9 Oct →
anubis16–19-0.0212%9 Oct →
anubis13–60.1231%7 Oct →
dust216–140.0027%5 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0226%5 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0519%5 Oct →
anubis13–80.0715%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.1119%30 Sept →
dust216–130.0213%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0417%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.006%28 Sept →
inferno13–60.0321%28 Sept →
nuke5–130.0111%23 Sept →
anubis6–130.0216%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0420%21 Sept →
inferno7–130.0125%21 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0225%21 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0417%17 Sept →
anubis3–130.0132%17 Sept →
anubis13–90.0613%17 Sept →
ancient9–130.0217%14 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0524%14 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0217%14 Sept →
inferno13–100.0110%9 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0122%9 Sept →
inferno13–100.0615%9 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.079%8 Sept →
dust213–30.1021%8 Sept →
dust213–100.0820%7 Sept →
inferno13–10.1213%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.0419%7 Sept →
mirage7–130.0248%7 Sept →
dust211–130.0330%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0018%6 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0912%3 Sept →
anubis13–50.1116%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0321%3 Sept →
mirage14–160.0126%2 Sept →
dust213–90.0122%2 Sept →
anubis8–130.0116%2 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0318%31 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0123%31 Aug →
inferno22–18-0.0224%30 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0512%30 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0212%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.0113%29 Aug →
anubis13–60.0314%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0014%29 Aug →
dust214–160.0319%29 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0113%27 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0221%27 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.029%26 Aug →
anubis8–130.0218%26 Aug →
mirage15–150.0117%25 Aug →
inferno11–130.0120%25 Aug →
anubis13–30.0323%25 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0236%25 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0225%24 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.