eNergy

eNergy — CS2 Stats

DE76561197972864032[U:1:12598304]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,136Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,542Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62856 of 259985 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,469 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,542 -201 1 Sept – 4 Nov · 14 days played
21,06323,491peak 23,4911 Sept4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,469 +0 1 Sept – 8 Sept · 3 observations
1,4691,469peak 1,4691 Sept8 Sept
23,491Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,469Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,469
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,949 below peak (23,491)
  • +105 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,458 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeNergyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,469 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,542 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,469csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time516ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 10–4 · italy, 30 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · ancient, 16 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 4 Nov →
13–2Biggest win · italy, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
italyA2516–964%0.06
anubisA1911–858%-0.00
dust2C167–944%-0.01
infernoB137–654%0.01
mirageD103–730%-0.01
cacheS64–267%-0.00
nukeD62–433%0.01
ancientC52–340%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

219Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
74.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5859%1.2013.4
Inferno5271%1.2814.9
Ancient3444%1.0214.7
Dust23139%0.9012.6
Nuke1662%1.3515.9
Mirage1233%0.8513.6
Overpass838%1.1115.6
Vertigo450%1.0815.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
512msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
14.87HE damage / grenade
3.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4312 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
italy11–13-0.0221%4 Nov →
cache5–13-0.0417%4 Nov →
cache13–6-0.0011%4 Nov →
inferno13–70.0513%4 Nov →
cache13–50.0815%4 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0413%4 Nov →
ancient9–130.0124%3 Nov →
dust213–40.0027%3 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0429%3 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.0714%3 Nov →
mirage6–130.0026%3 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0321%3 Nov →
italy13–80.0619%3 Nov →
italy13–40.0118%2 Nov →
cache13–10-0.0733%2 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0321%2 Nov →
inferno13–4-0.0228%2 Nov →
inferno8–130.0326%2 Nov →
mirage13–80.0610%2 Nov →
italy10–40.1722%30 Oct →
italy13–60.1430%30 Oct →
cache13–100.0421%30 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0128%30 Oct →
dust210–130.0420%30 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0219%30 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0126%30 Oct →
italy13–50.0513%28 Oct →
italy8–130.1125%28 Oct →
anubis13–40.0721%28 Oct →
inferno13–80.0111%28 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0217%28 Oct →
italy13–100.1026%26 Oct →
nuke14–160.0317%26 Oct →
anubis13–90.017%26 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0425%26 Oct →
anubis13–110.0317%23 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0529%23 Oct →
mirage6–130.0416%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0629%23 Oct →
anubis11–130.0422%23 Oct →
anubis13–90.0317%23 Oct →
italy13–100.0922%21 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0320%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0318%21 Oct →
anubis13–50.0018%21 Oct →
italy13–110.0819%19 Oct →
italy13–20.0724%19 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.0112%19 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0220%19 Oct →
anubis13–70.0514%19 Oct →
nuke6–130.0732%19 Oct →
italy6–13-0.0324%16 Oct →
italy1–13-0.0821%16 Oct →
italy13–60.0523%16 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0320%16 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0418%16 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0011%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0724%16 Oct →
ancient13–50.0342%16 Oct →
italy12–120.0424%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0724%14 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0312%14 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0428%14 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.069%14 Oct →
inferno9–130.0223%14 Oct →
italy13–110.0831%13 Oct →
italy9–130.0132%13 Oct →
italy10–20.010%13 Oct →
italy7–130.1128%12 Oct →
italy13–100.0727%12 Oct →
nuke13–70.0715%12 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0422%12 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0218%12 Oct →
inferno9–130.0118%12 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0018%12 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0037%12 Oct →
italy7–130.0525%12 Oct →
ancient13–100.0225%9 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0115%9 Oct →
inferno13–110.0429%9 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0113%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0813%9 Oct →
anubis16–19-0.0223%9 Oct →
dust213–5-0.016%7 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0211%7 Oct →
italy13–30.1326%7 Oct →
anubis13–90.0115%7 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0312%7 Oct →
italy13–90.1021%5 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0118%5 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0223%5 Oct →
inferno10–130.0019%5 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0124%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0717%2 Oct →
mirage10–130.0213%2 Oct →
italy6–130.0118%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0515%2 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0320%2 Oct →
dust216–120.079%2 Oct →
italy13–40.1019%30 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.