KVLZ

KVLZ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198243843132[U:1:283577404]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,308Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,361Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,754Blue band · top ~35% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,754 -2,443 28 Aug – 29 Oct · 33 days played
13,75417,811peak 17,81128 Aug29 Oct
17,892Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,057 below peak (17,811)
  • -3,256 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,246 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate49.3%42.0%44.4%above
Shot accuracy13.2%9.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.981.030.04 short
Match win rate39.7%43.8%45.2%5.5% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKVLZPREMIER13,754 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning56
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility4.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time595ms+70ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 15 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 1–10 · anubis, 17 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 4 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC228–1436%-0.01
infernoB209–1145%-0.02
cacheA1912–763%0.00
mirageD154–1127%-0.01
dust2B105–550%-0.01
ancientC73–443%-0.03
anubisD51–420%-0.01
debris—10–10%-0.18
eldorado—10–10%-0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

117,263Lifetime kills
0.99K/D · Top 50% of Blue band
5,902Matches
39.7%Match win rate
49.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
11,160MVPs
2,233Hours (in match)
3,595Bombs planted
1,416Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,107
AWP18,566
SSG 087,926
P905,431
Negev4,643

Lifetime map wins

6,122inferno
5,797dust2
5,613nuke
2,149train
1,809vertigo
1,618cbble
589office
220safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

525Matches
50%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
79.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1560%1.0114.7
Mirage1242%0.8615.7
Inferno1050%1.1416.6
Ancient862%1.1814.3
Dust2580%1.1013.2
Overpass250%1.0615.0
Anubis20%0.609.5
Cache1100%1.6725.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
64.6%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
13.46HE damage / grenade
10.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4521 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0518%29 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0313%29 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0020%28 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0416%28 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0238%28 Oct →
cache13–110.027%28 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0218%27 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0243%27 Oct →
mirage9–130.0120%27 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0821%26 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0136%26 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0129%26 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0313%25 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0427%25 Oct →
anubis16–130.0211%25 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0520%23 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0810%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.049%22 Oct →
cache13–90.0230%19 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.1329%19 Oct →
nuke13–80.0918%17 Oct →
anubis1–10-0.0867%17 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0115%17 Oct →
cache9–130.0027%17 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0521%17 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0522%15 Oct →
cache13–110.0124%15 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0227%14 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0614%14 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0220%14 Oct →
nuke13–100.0720%13 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0014%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0530%12 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0327%12 Oct →
debris8–8-0.180%12 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1025%12 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.1020%9 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0820%9 Oct →
mirage12–160.0317%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0126%1 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0225%1 Oct →
dust213–110.0227%30 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0219%30 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0120%30 Sept →
inferno13–50.0420%30 Sept →
inferno9–40.0621%30 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0115%29 Sept →
cache13–40.0812%29 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0424%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.0127%28 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0525%28 Sept →
dust213–30.0630%28 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0216%28 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0522%18 Sept →
inferno13–70.0224%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.088%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0218%17 Sept →
cache13–50.0218%17 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0517%16 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0135%16 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0124%15 Sept →
mirage7–130.1035%15 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0317%15 Sept →
nuke9–50.1833%15 Sept →
eldorado1–9-0.2525%15 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0917%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0218%13 Sept →
nuke13–60.0226%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0726%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0424%12 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0735%12 Sept →
ancient13–80.0024%12 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0415%12 Sept →
dust28–130.0220%12 Sept →
cache13–90.0145%12 Sept →
ancient13–50.0336%6 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0836%6 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0414%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0236%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.0319%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.110%4 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0318%4 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0722%4 Sept →
cache13–50.0538%4 Sept →
dust213–3-0.019%4 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0432%4 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0423%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0619%4 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0333%4 Sept →
nuke3–130.0032%4 Sept →
cache13–100.0324%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0923%3 Sept →
inferno13–60.0817%3 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0113%3 Sept →
inferno8–80.0114%3 Sept →
cache13–90.0619%2 Sept →
anubis15–150.0423%2 Sept →
inferno4–130.0110%1 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0429%31 Aug →
inferno15–150.0515%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.