freakymikupeewater

freakymikupeewater — CS2 Stats

US76561198209311695[U:1:249045967]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,535Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,018Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+28Tracked matches · now 1,535
+10.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 60.0%

Rating over time

14Days played since 2026-06-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches27——
Win rate59%——
K/D1.04——
Headshot %40%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning65
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility1.0
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels5.5

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.5
Utility1.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time518ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · office, 16 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · office, 22 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · office, 15 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · office, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB6130–3149%-0.00
nukeC94–544%-0.00
mirageS86–275%-0.01
ancientC52–340%-0.03
anubisD50–50%-0.04
cacheC52–340%-0.01
dust2—42–250%0.00
inferno—11–0100%0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.05
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,269Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
2,963Matches
42.6%Match win rate
32.4%Headshot %
8.4%Shot accuracy
6,848MVPs
934Hours (in match)
1,614Bombs planted
383Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,329
AWP8,491
MP92,742
SSG 082,169
FAMAS1,152

Lifetime map wins

5,633office
4,775nuke
3,642dust2
1,287inferno
765vertigo
439train
346lake
181cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
62%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
—ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno333%0.7013.3
Nuke367%1.1816.7
Vertigo1100%0.7512.0
Dust21100%2.2220.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
520msReaction time
64.6%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.03Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
6.50HE damage / grenade
0.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.5702% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0286 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0516%8 Oct →
mirage13–80.0110%8 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.058%1 Oct →
office10–13-0.0620%26 Sept →
office8–13-0.0113%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0223%17 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.049%17 Sept →
mirage16–140.0211%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.0516%17 Sept →
office13–60.0721%17 Sept →
office13–10.0219%17 Sept →
office13–80.0410%16 Sept →
office10–13-0.0113%16 Sept →
office13–40.0914%16 Sept →
anubis11–130.0113%16 Sept →
dust211–130.0116%16 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0013%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0119%16 Sept →
office5–13-0.0621%15 Sept →
office9–13-0.0610%15 Sept →
office6–13-0.0815%15 Sept →
office13–20.0328%15 Sept →
office13–70.0510%15 Sept →
mirage13–80.0116%15 Sept →
mirage8–130.0114%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0210%15 Sept →
ancient16–130.0017%15 Sept →
office13–60.0211%26 Jul →
office6–13-0.077%26 Jul →
office13–70.0525%26 Jul →
office13–100.0214%26 Jul →
office7–130.019%25 Jul →
office8–130.017%25 Jul →
office13–20.0316%25 Jul →
office13–30.0810%25 Jul →
office13–10-0.0212%25 Jul →
cache13–9-0.028%25 Jul →
office10–130.0314%25 Jul →
office13–110.059%25 Jul →
office11–130.018%25 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.1010%23 Jul →
nuke13–80.049%23 Jul →
office2–130.0514%23 Jul →
office13–100.0310%23 Jul →
office5–13-0.0310%23 Jul →
office11–130.0214%23 Jul →
office2–13-0.0115%23 Jul →
nuke7–130.0219%23 Jul →
office6–13-0.028%23 Jul →
office2–13-0.016%23 Jul →
office13–60.002%23 Jul →
office13–4-0.064%23 Jul →
office0–13-0.087%23 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0113%23 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0416%23 Jul →
office9–130.0810%23 Jul →
office13–11-0.0120%23 Jul →
office7–13-0.0912%23 Jul →
office13–9-0.086%22 Jul →
office2–13-0.1010%22 Jul →
office4–130.0310%22 Jul →
office6–130.0820%22 Jul →
dust213–70.049%22 Jul →
nuke11–130.0117%22 Jul →
office5–13-0.063%22 Jul →
anubis3–6-0.050%22 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0518%22 Jul →
anubis6–12-0.0214%22 Jul →
office8–13-0.0323%22 Jul →
office13–9-0.0622%22 Jul →
office7–130.0435%22 Jul →
office13–80.0220%22 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0612%22 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0523%22 Jul →
office13–90.0024%22 Jul →
office7–13-0.0328%22 Jul →
office7–20.0619%22 Jul →
cache8–130.0719%22 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0213%21 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0213%21 Jul →
nuke7–130.0418%12 Jun →
cache7–13-0.0120%12 Jun →
office8–130.016%11 Jun →
office6–13-0.049%11 Jun →
dust213–8-0.009%11 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.077%11 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.070%11 Jun →
mirage1–13-0.0816%11 Jun →
office4–13-0.0111%11 Jun →
office5–1-0.038%11 Jun →
vertigo10–130.0517%11 Jun →
office13–110.0314%11 Jun →
office13–10-0.0114%11 Jun →
office13–10-0.0216%11 Jun →
office13–10-0.0118%11 Jun →
office9–10.0714%11 Jun →
office12–12-0.0316%11 Jun →
office13–100.0422%11 Jun →
office13–10-0.0610%11 Jun →
overpass13–50.0229%10 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.