HeatedFall

HeatedFall — CS2 Stats

CA76561198189606315[U:1:229340587]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

886Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,113Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.6%42.7%43.8%5.2% short
Shot accuracy17.1%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.880.991.020.14 short
Match win rate45.2%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeatedFallFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning36
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateTLTLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.7pp headshot accuracy · −65ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 032 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 20

  • 1163 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 693ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility1.4
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 692ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning3.6
Utility1.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact9.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time702ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 702ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+5.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–2 · train, 7 Jan
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · shelter, 12 Jul
500msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 18 Feb
13–0Biggest win · cache, 17 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

wardenBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB137654%-0.03
officeC125742%-0.03
ancientB126650%-0.05
mirageD91811%-0.04
infernoB63350%-0.09
vertigoB63350%-0.06
anubisB63350%-0.05
overpassD62433%-0.07
trainS54180%-0.00
wardenS550100%-0.01
italyS54180%-0.04
dust242250%-0.04
nuke31233%-0.05
alpine220100%-0.07
grail21150%-0.08
fachwerk110100%-0.05
shelter110100%-0.04
stronghold110100%-0.04
agency110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,180Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
3,320Matches
45.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
38.6%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
5,950MVPs
1,307Hours (in match)
4,669Bombs planted
658Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,695inferno
2,084dust2
1,534vertigo
1,038cbble
1,025train
793nuke
377office
117aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

171Matches
47%Win rate
0.67Avg K/D
52.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

14%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2367%0.8211.3
Ancient367%0.265.3
Nuke20%0.468.0
Anubis250%0.6912.5
Overpass250%0.4210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.9%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
692msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.19Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
0.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1858 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9223% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.0419%7 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0430%6 Sept
cache12–12-0.0118%6 Sept
inferno1–13-0.1220%6 Sept
cache5–13-0.0220%6 Sept
train13–8-0.0526%5 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0620%5 Sept
cache13–9-0.0017%1 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0133%17 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0917%17 Jul
fachwerk13–11-0.0539%12 Jul
shelter3–0-0.04100%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.1019%31 May
office4–8-0.0933%31 May
warden13–5-0.0116%29 May
cache13–30.0218%29 May
italy13–7-0.0513%17 May
cache13–9-0.0410%17 May
office7–13-0.1211%17 May
cache13–0-0.0127%17 May
cache13–2-0.0521%10 May
cache13–50.0130%10 May
cache8–13-0.0510%2 May
cache11–130.0224%2 May
office11–13-0.0420%2 May
office13–5-0.0127%2 May
cache10–13-0.0621%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.056%30 Apr
stronghold10–8-0.0423%25 Apr
warden13–8-0.0525%25 Apr
office2–8-0.1119%25 Apr
italy13–8-0.0121%25 Apr
italy13–6-0.0423%18 Apr
office13–100.0119%18 Apr
alpine13–6-0.0633%12 Apr
warden13–10-0.0028%12 Apr
office10–130.0141%11 Apr
overpass10–13-0.064%26 Mar
warden13–10.0420%15 Mar
alpine13–9-0.0722%15 Mar
warden13–4-0.039%15 Mar
office13–70.0026%2 Mar
ancient12–12-0.0222%2 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0524%2 Feb
agency13–60.0029%5 Jan
inferno13–5-0.0221%5 Jan
ancient13–11-0.1014%12 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0814%29 Nov
vertigo7–13-0.0813%22 Nov
ancient2–00.020%22 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0617%13 Nov
mirage13–9-0.0215%8 Nov
office13–8-0.0317%6 Nov
office11–130.0126%2 Nov
vertigo7–13-0.0614%10 Oct
office7–13-0.0511%25 Sept
inferno4–13-0.1018%25 Sept
overpass5–13-0.0814%26 Aug
grail13–5-0.0927%26 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0621%26 Aug
italy13–1-0.0713%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0010%26 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0325%20 Aug
anubis13–6-0.058%20 Aug
overpass17–19-0.0724%10 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0713%10 Aug
nuke3–13-0.1212%9 Aug
overpass13–7-0.0717%9 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0613%9 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0911%3 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0718%2 Aug
office13–50.0120%2 Aug
ancient13–9-0.046%10 May
grail2–13-0.0712%10 May
inferno13–8-0.0415%1 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0719%1 Apr
train13–10-0.0922%1 Apr
anubis16–13-0.089%22 Mar
ancient13–90.0134%21 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0818%20 Mar
dust213–20.0112%18 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0420%18 Mar
dust218–22-0.0723%18 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0413%18 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0224%18 Feb
mirage10–130.0216%15 Feb
dust25–13-0.100%14 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0514%14 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0216%14 Feb
ancient10–13-0.073%22 Jan
train13–20.0616%7 Jan
nuke13–110.0219%7 Jan
inferno6–9-0.2016%7 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0229%7 Jan
overpass11–13-0.127%12 Dec
train9–130.0326%12 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0443%12 Dec
dust213–90.0223%11 Dec
italy7–13-0.0532%7 Dec
train13–100.0418%7 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →