Eckz

Eckz — CS2 Stats

CA76561198213372224[U:1:253106496]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,492Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,952Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,492 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,573 +41 6 Apr – 5 Jul · 15 days played
24,25726,016peak 26,0166 Apr5 Jul
26,167Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,015Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-04-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 18 Sep 2026 and 16 Oct 2026.

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate61.5%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy12.7%13.2%13.7%1.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.711.071.09above
Match win rate75.1%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEckzFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,015csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning60
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 5 May →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 11 Apr →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 12 May →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 17 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14officeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC198–1142%0.01
ancientC146–843%-0.01
nukeS1410–471%0.00
mirageA138–562%0.00
anubisB126–650%0.03
infernoA116–555%0.00
officeD51–420%0.03
overpass—42–250%0.03
dust2—32–167%0.00
warden—22–0100%0.09
stronghold—11–0100%0.02
italy—11–0100%0.03
alpine—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

170,314Lifetime kills
1.71K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
9,586Matches
75.1%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 9 players
61.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
12.7%Shot accuracy
11,977MVPs
2,952Hours (in match)
4,498Bombs planted
2,638Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4786,581
AWP11,554
Knife2,153
Tec-92,109

Lifetime map wins

9,149inferno
4,789vertigo
3,550nuke
2,460dust2
446cbble
412train
284office
163italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,014Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
72.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis12856%1.0115.0
Ancient9551%0.8913.6
Vertigo8452%0.9814.9
Mirage8044%0.8913.0
Nuke6453%1.1015.2
Inferno5145%1.0513.6
Overpass2759%1.2917.3
Dust21741%0.8512.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
601msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
22.3%Flash assists
4.64HE damage / grenade
10.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4568% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0618%12 Jul →
cache13–70.0226%12 Jul →
mirage13–50.0117%12 Jul →
ancient13–70.0116%5 Jul →
cache4–130.0228%20 Jun →
mirage7–12-0.053%20 Jun →
nuke19–17-0.0015%7 Jun →
anubis15–150.0214%6 Jun →
overpass13–90.0116%31 May →
cache21–25-0.0019%31 May →
cache12–120.0122%31 May →
office4–80.0633%31 May →
ancient11–13-0.0411%30 May →
inferno13–80.1019%30 May →
nuke13–70.027%30 May →
inferno13–100.0319%30 May →
overpass6–13-0.0223%30 May →
nuke13–2-0.0914%30 May →
anubis19–17-0.0315%29 May →
mirage5–13-0.0410%29 May →
ancient14–16-0.0211%29 May →
inferno5–13-0.0227%29 May →
dust213–100.0310%28 May →
overpass11–130.0314%27 May →
ancient13–90.0819%26 May →
mirage13–30.1124%26 May →
mirage13–50.0724%25 May →
cache11–13-0.0219%25 May →
dust26–13-0.0819%25 May →
cache7–13-0.0619%24 May →
cache13–110.0514%24 May →
cache10–130.0614%24 May →
nuke13–110.0313%21 May →
ancient4–13-0.0222%20 May →
inferno7–13-0.0311%19 May →
nuke13–40.0015%18 May →
inferno13–20.0428%18 May →
anubis9–130.048%18 May →
ancient13–80.026%18 May →
ancient6–13-0.077%18 May →
office7–130.0422%17 May →
cache13–00.0413%17 May →
inferno13–16-0.019%16 May →
anubis8–130.0115%16 May →
mirage13–110.0213%16 May →
mirage6–13-0.0111%16 May →
anubis6–13-0.023%16 May →
inferno13–8-0.0315%16 May →
nuke10–13-0.0019%14 May →
ancient8–130.0125%13 May →
mirage13–70.0317%13 May →
ancient13–100.0211%12 May →
mirage10–13-0.0019%11 May →
anubis13–70.1322%10 May →
mirage10–00.0219%10 May →
nuke13–11-0.0313%9 May →
inferno13–20.059%9 May →
ancient13–8-0.0026%9 May →
overpass16–140.1113%9 May →
anubis13–40.0018%6 May →
cache12–120.0012%5 May →
anubis13–30.1518%5 May →
ancient13–80.0414%4 May →
dust213–10.0522%3 May →
mirage13–110.018%2 May →
cache13–9-0.0119%2 May →
office11–13-0.0315%2 May →
office13–50.0535%2 May →
cache13–80.0327%2 May →
cache13–3-0.019%2 May →
cache13–110.0510%2 May →
cache11–13-0.0018%2 May →
cache6–13-0.0232%2 May →
cache10–130.0316%30 Apr →
cache13–80.055%30 Apr →
nuke13–70.0825%30 Apr →
cache8–13-0.0217%28 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0212%28 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0710%26 Apr →
stronghold10–80.0215%25 Apr →
warden13–80.0819%25 Apr →
office2–80.0421%25 Apr →
italy13–80.0320%25 Apr →
inferno13–20.0314%24 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0421%24 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0415%20 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.029%13 Apr →
nuke13–100.0411%13 Apr →
anubis8–130.0221%12 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.029%12 Apr →
alpine13–60.0912%12 Apr →
warden13–100.1013%12 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0511%11 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0640%11 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0025%11 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.049%10 Apr →
nuke13–10.0311%9 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.018%8 Apr →
nuke13–20.0119%6 Apr →
anubis13–90.0223%6 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.