Wozalski — CS2 Stats

76561198165581773[U:1:205316045]✓ No bans

243Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,654Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.1%42.7%44.0%1.9% short
Shot accuracy21.4%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.001.03above
Match win rate31.5%44.1%45.1%13.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWozalskiFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning56
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52435Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression6.7
Utility5.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time649ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 91% over 11dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32171553%0.01
infernoB26141254%-0.00
cacheS1110191%0.05
overpassC104640%0.01
dust2D92722%-0.01
nukeD62433%-0.00
vertigo220100%0.05
ancient2020%-0.01
anubis1010%-0.10
train110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,038Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
5,271Matches
31.5%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
21.4%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 4 players
4,717MVPs
2,106Hours (in match)
1,515Bombs planted
491Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,374inferno
2,020dust2
885vertigo
474train
394safehouse
314nuke
266cbble
241lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
646msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
5.51HE damage / grenade
8.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5652% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0122%16 Aug
vertigo13–60.0316%14 Aug
cache13–110.0320%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.019%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0529%12 Aug
cache13–11-0.0222%7 Aug
cache13–20.1618%7 Aug
cache13–70.0530%22 Jul
ancient12–160.0211%19 Jul
nuke2–130.0126%18 Jul
inferno13–20.1127%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0715%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0228%18 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0035%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0017%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0217%12 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0119%10 Jul
cache13–30.0414%10 Jul
mirage9–130.0212%23 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0524%23 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0122%21 Jun
overpass13–60.007%21 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0112%21 Jun
inferno6–130.0212%21 Jun
dust26–13-0.0129%15 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0320%15 Jun
inferno13–30.1133%15 Jun
nuke2–13-0.1222%14 Jun
dust26–13-0.039%14 Jun
mirage4–130.0238%13 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0311%12 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0722%12 Jun
nuke11–130.0733%12 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0714%12 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0117%12 Jun
inferno13–100.0117%12 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0625%8 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0626%7 Jun
dust24–130.0432%7 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0334%7 Jun
overpass16–130.0516%7 Jun
inferno13–80.0026%7 Jun
mirage15–150.0115%6 Jun
mirage13–50.0228%6 Jun
inferno13–70.0112%6 Jun
overpass8–130.0318%6 Jun
cache6–130.0914%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0330%5 Jun
mirage13–40.0523%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0925%5 Jun
mirage13–10.0417%5 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0911%5 Jun
overpass13–100.0322%4 Jun
overpass16–130.0717%3 Jun
mirage13–30.0725%3 Jun
inferno13–8-0.019%3 Jun
dust28–13-0.0716%3 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0132%3 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0216%1 Jun
mirage13–5-0.049%1 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0329%31 May
overpass8–130.0419%31 May
mirage16–140.0514%30 May
mirage3–13-0.0216%30 May
anubis5–13-0.1021%23 May
mirage13–9-0.0111%23 May
mirage15–15-0.0319%22 May
inferno13–16-0.0319%22 May
mirage13–30.0913%21 May
dust213–90.0219%21 May
inferno13–40.0513%21 May
mirage13–10.0811%21 May
mirage13–60.0518%18 May
overpass5–13-0.0021%18 May
inferno7–13-0.0728%18 May
mirage13–110.0216%18 May
inferno13–110.0224%17 May
inferno11–13-0.0314%17 May
cache13–20.0827%15 May
nuke13–10-0.0119%15 May
inferno9–130.0116%15 May
vertigo13–10.0713%15 May
ancient2–13-0.0432%14 May
dust22–13-0.0312%14 May
inferno8–13-0.1010%14 May
train13–50.0720%11 May
nuke13–60.1013%7 May
dust213–80.0516%7 May
inferno13–7-0.0214%7 May
inferno12–120.0232%5 May
inferno13–9-0.0211%1 May
mirage13–30.058%1 May
cache13–6-0.0026%1 May
cache13–9-0.0631%1 May
cache13–10.0615%30 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0215%30 Apr
inferno4–00.1475%29 Apr
cache13–90.0922%29 Apr
mirage12–120.0113%28 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0419%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →