slagbonky

slagbonky — CS2 Stats

GB76561198257665730[U:1:297400002]Steam profile ↗

297Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,441Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate31.5%44.0%44.7%13.2% short
Shot accuracy19.4%11.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.031.040.08 short
Match win rate30.7%45.1%45.2%14.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGslagbonkyFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning65
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT513514Last 10051%Win rateWWLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression9.9
Utility5.8
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels5.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time650ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — vertigo 9–1
130Biggest win — train
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 20infernoWeakest map · 39% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoB24121250%0.06
infernoC2391439%0.03
cacheS2013765%0.03
nukeA1810856%0.03
mirageB105550%0.00
train32167%0.01
overpass1010%0.07
grail1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,816Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
3,971Matches
30.7%Match win rate
31.5%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 5 players
7,648MVPs
1,441Hours (in match)
2,256Bombs planted
744Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP32,165
AK-4729,590
Knife1,814
Tec-91,009
P250996

Lifetime map wins

4,560vertigo
2,863inferno
1,765dust2
1,165cbble
1,078nuke
609train
125lake
109safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
648msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
61.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
11.43HE damage / grenade
7.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4235% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–60.1028%14 Aug
cache13–110.0214%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0124%14 Aug
inferno5–130.0519%14 Aug
cache13–11-0.0120%7 Aug
cache13–20.0311%7 Aug
mirage12–20.0320%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0529%7 Aug
nuke13–20.0613%3 Jul
mirage13–90.0127%3 Jul
cache13–10.0526%3 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0027%3 Jul
cache7–130.0636%27 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0022%26 Jun
vertigo13–60.1010%26 Jun
cache13–1-0.0230%19 Jun
mirage13–9-0.029%19 Jun
nuke6–90.0319%19 Jun
vertigo8–130.1420%13 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0416%13 Jun
inferno12–120.0917%12 Jun
inferno4–130.0229%12 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0416%12 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0810%7 Jun
nuke13–110.0426%6 Jun
inferno9–130.0215%6 Jun
nuke13–70.0936%6 Jun
nuke5–130.0220%6 Jun
inferno13–30.075%5 Jun
cache6–13-0.0029%5 Jun
vertigo12–120.0924%5 Jun
vertigo13–90.1016%5 Jun
nuke13–110.0428%29 May
cache13–100.0939%29 May
inferno13–20.1218%29 May
cache10–13-0.0622%29 May
vertigo12–120.0919%25 May
cache13–80.0319%25 May
nuke13–6-0.0338%24 May
cache13–50.0736%24 May
vertigo13–80.0927%24 May
inferno12–12-0.0230%24 May
cache2–13-0.0325%24 May
overpass12–120.0719%23 May
inferno7–130.027%23 May
cache13–20.047%15 May
nuke13–100.017%15 May
inferno9–13-0.0211%15 May
vertigo13–10.1334%15 May
cache10–130.0518%15 May
inferno13–7-0.0214%9 May
nuke13–100.0519%9 May
cache13–60.0814%9 May
inferno13–110.0717%2 May
vertigo12–120.0021%2 May
nuke12–120.0527%2 May
cache13–90.0524%2 May
inferno12–120.1218%1 May
vertigo13–50.0516%1 May
nuke13–110.0124%1 May
cache13–100.0215%1 May
mirage12–120.0429%3 Apr
vertigo13–90.1317%3 Apr
inferno13–30.1616%3 Apr
vertigo6–130.0535%19 Sept
nuke13–100.1817%19 Sept
mirage13–30.0017%19 Sept
inferno12–120.0519%19 Sept
train13–110.0518%11 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0125%11 Sept
inferno13–50.0867%7 Sept
train8–13-0.0535%7 Sept
vertigo13–80.0915%18 Jul
inferno3–130.0613%27 Jun
grail11–130.0219%27 Jun
train13–00.0224%3 May
vertigo13–110.0823%5 Sept
vertigo7–90.0214%18 Jul
mirage9–2-0.0311%6 Jul
cache5–9-0.0429%6 Jul
inferno9–70.0315%4 Jul
vertigo9–60.0624%4 Jul
mirage4–9-0.0824%13 Jun
nuke7–90.0116%13 Jun
cache9–70.1215%13 Jun
vertigo9–10.2821%9 Jun
mirage8–8-0.039%9 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0213%3 Jun
vertigo10–16-0.0718%24 Apr
vertigo1–9-0.0230%24 Apr
vertigo9–20.0410%23 Apr
vertigo5–9-0.0319%17 Apr
mirage8–80.1013%29 Mar
nuke5–90.0635%27 Mar
inferno3–9-0.0915%27 Mar
vertigo3–40.0140%5 Mar
nuke9–70.0616%19 Dec
inferno9–50.0626%1 Nov
vertigo8–80.0427%1 Nov
cache8–80.1027%14 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →