✪tomeZ✪

✪tomeZ✪ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198154714223[U:1:194448495]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,417Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,588Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,983Purple band · top ~20.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 823 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,417 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 7 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,983 +464 12 Jul18 Sept · 21 days played
16,32318,166peak 18,16612 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 823 +0 31 Aug18 Sept · 2 observations
823823peak 82331 Aug18 Sept
18,166Peak Premier in tracked matches
823Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-07-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 823
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 78 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,183 below peak (18,166)
  • -448 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,017 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.7%42.7%43.8%3.1% short
Shot accuracy12.0%11.3%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio0.780.991.020.24 short
Match win rate41.9%43.9%44.7%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪tomeZ✪FACEITLevel 4 · 823 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,983 · Purple bandPEAK ELO823csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning55
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateWWTWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility4.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.5
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time610ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 30 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 22 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 30 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC1971237%-0.02
cacheB1910953%-0.01
mirageB189950%-0.03
nukeA1811761%-0.01
ancientC94544%-0.02
dust2S75271%-0.01
anubisC73443%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.00
poseidon110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,648Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
6,282Matches
41.9%Match win rate
40.7%Headshot %
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
13,230MVPs
2,588Hours (in match)
8,916Bombs planted
1,169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,334
AWP6,855
MAC-104,220
MP93,111
FAMAS2,211
UMP-452,017

Lifetime map wins

10,379inferno
5,240dust2
4,376nuke
3,691train
2,149office
2,026vertigo
1,189cbble
318lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

141Matches
48%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
79.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
4%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1346%0.9015.1
Cache1155%1.0215.0
Mirage1040%0.9716.5
Inferno944%0.7712.4
Ancient967%1.1215.2
Anubis650%0.8613.7
Overpass475%1.2620.0
Dust2367%1.4819.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
610msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
10.68HE damage / grenade
2.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6497 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2159% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0315%3 Sept
inferno9–70.1319%30 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.014%30 Aug
cache13–00.087%30 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0521%30 Aug
dust213–20.048%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0016%30 Aug
cache7–13-0.0510%30 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1110%30 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0815%30 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0211%28 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0214%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0515%26 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0717%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0919%24 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0013%24 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0010%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0420%23 Aug
nuke8–13-0.1012%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0520%23 Aug
cache11–13-0.0519%22 Aug
dust213–5-0.0133%22 Aug
mirage13–110.0123%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0511%22 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0018%22 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0819%22 Aug
nuke13–11-0.029%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.116%22 Aug
cache15–15-0.0112%19 Aug
cache13–7-0.029%19 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0213%19 Aug
mirage13–80.047%19 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0215%18 Aug
ancient9–130.0725%18 Aug
vertigo4–130.0017%18 Aug
nuke6–130.0610%18 Aug
cache13–7-0.0410%17 Aug
inferno13–80.0317%17 Aug
cache13–11-0.0314%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0326%17 Aug
cache3–13-0.074%16 Aug
dust216–120.0414%16 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0211%16 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0213%16 Aug
nuke13–80.0128%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0114%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0918%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0117%14 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0016%14 Aug
ancient3–13-0.058%13 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0612%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0615%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0621%13 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0713%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.127%12 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0219%12 Aug
cache13–6-0.0515%12 Aug
nuke10–20.0124%11 Aug
nuke13–80.0311%11 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0522%11 Aug
cache12–12-0.0315%10 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0226%10 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0027%10 Aug
poseidon9–70.0527%10 Aug
cache16–120.0110%15 Jul
inferno13–100.0819%15 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0422%14 Jul
cache13–00.0731%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.1010%13 Jul
cache13–5-0.0420%12 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0513%12 Jul
inferno5–130.0224%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0314%12 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0311%12 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0315%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0314%11 Jul
inferno13–11-0.024%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0120%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0210%10 Jul
inferno13–100.0022%10 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0210%10 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0112%10 Jul
nuke13–90.0726%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0714%9 Jul
mirage13–60.1019%9 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0213%9 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0521%8 Jul
dust210–13-0.0612%8 Jul
dust213–60.0716%8 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0625%8 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0515%8 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0111%8 Jul
anubis13–80.0115%8 Jul
cache13–70.0716%8 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0228%8 Jul
cache13–110.0212%7 Jul
inferno13–6-0.029%7 Jul
nuke13–100.0020%7 Jul
cache7–130.0119%7 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0418%7 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →