๐™ฝ๐šŽ๐š•๐šž๐šŠ๐š›

๐™ฝ๐šŽ๐š•๐šž๐šŠ๐š› โ€” CS2 Stats

JP76561198143895816[U:1:183630088]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

356Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,362Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,488Blue band ยท top ~31.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,488 -179 20 Aug โ€“ 29 Oct ยท 20 days played
13,83815,739peak 15,73920 Aug29 Oct
15,934Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,251 below peak (15,739)
  • +444 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 512 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate30.2%44.8%45.7%15.5% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.241.031.05above
Match win rate46.6%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐™ฝ๐šŽ๐š•๐šž๐šŠ๐š›FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,488 ยท Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning58
Utility61

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47โ€“48โ€“5Last 10047%Win rateWLWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.04 avg rating ยท โˆ’6.7pp headshot accuracy ยท +12ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (โˆ’0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4โ€“1 ยท 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 8โ€“2 ยท 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 13โ€“6โ€“1 ยท 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.00
Reaction time534msโˆ’34ms
first โ…“ avg 568ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.9%
first โ…“ avg 16.3% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating ยท 9โ€“2 ยท inferno, 8 Oct โ†’
44%Best headshot accuracy ยท 5โ€“9 ยท inferno, 8 Oct โ†’
406msFastest reaction time ยท 11โ€“13 ยท mirage, 7 Sept โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท nuke, 1 Sept โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3โ€“11In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map ยท 69% over 13infernoWeakest map ยท 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD217โ€“1433%-0.01
nukeA1811โ€“761%0.02
mirageC156โ€“940%-0.01
anubisC146โ€“843%-0.00
cacheS139โ€“469%-0.01
ancientB115โ€“645%-0.00
dust2C73โ€“443%-0.01
vertigoโ€”10โ€“10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,542Lifetime kills
1.24K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 6 players
1,966Matches
46.6%Match win rate ยท Top 50% of Level 6 players
30.2%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy ยท Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,863MVPs
837Hours (in match)
1,762Bombs planted
508Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,587
AWP5,001
MAC-101,521
MP91,201
AUG1,187
P90964

Lifetime map wins

2,180inferno
1,882dust2
1,519cbble
977nuke
469train
370vertigo
119office
116italy

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
56%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1856%1.0616.2
Mirage1464%0.9814.8
Cache1242%1.0115.0
Anubis1155%1.2814.8
Inferno771%1.2017.6
Ancient540%0.8312.2
Dust2367%1.4315.3
Vertigo1100%0.7515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
9.1ยฐPreaim
532msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
10.36HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8987% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13โ€“50.0020%29 Oct โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0216%29 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.0211%28 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.066%28 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0016%21 Oct โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0524%21 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0416%16 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“7-0.0311%16 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0514%16 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.0412%15 Oct โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0115%15 Oct โ†’
inferno16โ€“130.0410%15 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0219%15 Oct โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0243%14 Oct โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0218%13 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0319%13 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“90.1219%13 Oct โ†’
ancient8โ€“130.0131%13 Oct โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0214%8 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.2024%8 Oct โ†’
inferno6โ€“9-0.1515%8 Oct โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0844%8 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“6-0.0127%7 Oct โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.038%7 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0817%7 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0615%7 Oct โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.1023%7 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“5-0.0122%1 Oct โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.079%29 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“30.0124%28 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“60.0226%28 Sept โ†’
ancient5โ€“13-0.0813%28 Sept โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0131%28 Sept โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0331%28 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0215%28 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“20.0612%28 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0225%28 Sept โ†’
inferno4โ€“9-0.1214%28 Sept โ†’
anubis12โ€“12-0.0320%25 Sept โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.076%25 Sept โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0214%25 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“30.1019%25 Sept โ†’
vertigo5โ€“13-0.0219%25 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0017%24 Sept โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0117%24 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.0719%23 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0222%23 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0412%23 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.083%23 Sept โ†’
anubis12โ€“12-0.0317%23 Sept โ†’
nuke14โ€“160.0125%22 Sept โ†’
inferno16โ€“120.0011%21 Sept โ†’
mirage16โ€“130.0217%21 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0510%21 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.1017%21 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“50.1322%20 Sept โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.1015%20 Sept โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0730%20 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0212%18 Sept โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0521%18 Sept โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0419%17 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0015%17 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0218%17 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0229%17 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0129%15 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0831%15 Sept โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0217%8 Sept โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.116%8 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0515%8 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.1527%8 Sept โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.118%7 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0215%7 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.1113%7 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0523%7 Sept โ†’
inferno15โ€“150.0413%7 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0223%6 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.026%6 Sept โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0915%6 Sept โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0419%6 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0625%5 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.1019%5 Sept โ†’
cache2โ€“13-0.1233%5 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0210%4 Sept โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0426%4 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“16-0.0128%4 Sept โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0111%3 Sept โ†’
ancient6โ€“130.0121%3 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0323%3 Sept โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0316%3 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“130.0019%2 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0216%2 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0021%2 Sept โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0121%2 Sept โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.063%1 Sept โ†’
cache4โ€“00.010%1 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.017%1 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0415%1 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.036%1 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“00.0320%1 Sept โ†’
ancient5โ€“130.0114%20 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.