๐™ฝ๐šŽ๐š•๐šž๐šŠ๐š›

๐™ฝ๐šŽ๐š•๐šž๐šŠ๐š› โ€” CS2 Stats

JP76561198143895816[U:1:183630088]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

271Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,298Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,736Blue band ยท top ~29.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating ยท 14,736 โ†’ 14,736
+19Tracked matches ยท now 271
0.0ppWin rate ยท 41.4% โ†’ 41.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 26 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,736 +1,850 29 Jul โ€“ 10 Sept ยท 16 days played
12,88615,739peak 15,73929 Jul10 Sept
15,934Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-03-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,003 below peak (15,739)
  • +452 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 264 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2029โˆ’9
Win rate50%38%+12pp
K/D1.030.85+0.18
Headshot %48%48%โˆ’1pp

Measured 10 Sep 2026 โ†’ 17 Sep 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 โ†’ 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile โ€” every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate29.5%42.7%43.8%14.3% short
Shot accuracy16.8%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.260.991.02above
Match win rate46.5%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐™ฝ๐šŽ๐š•๐šž๐šŠ๐š›FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,736 ยท Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning42
Utility54

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43โ€“51โ€“6Last 10043%Win rateLWLWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate ยท +0.04 avg rating ยท +4.8pp headshot accuracy ยท +35ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 6โ€“4 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 10โ€“9โ€“1 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.03
first โ…“ avg -0.04 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.01
Reaction time578msโˆ’66ms
first โ…“ avg 644ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%โˆ’6.5%
first โ…“ avg 25.6% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating ยท 9โ€“6 ยท inferno, 19 Aug โ†’
75%Best headshot accuracy ยท 0โ€“9 ยท inferno, 31 Mar โ†’
406msFastest reaction time ยท 11โ€“13 ยท mirage, 7 Sept โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท nuke, 1 Sept โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
6โ€“9In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 71% over 7ancientWeakest map ยท 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2810โ€“1836%-0.03
mirageC187โ€“1139%-0.01
nukeA149โ€“564%0.02
cacheB136โ€“746%-0.02
ancientD102โ€“820%-0.00
anubisC94โ€“544%-0.01
dust2S75โ€“271%-0.02
overpassโ€”10โ€“10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,989Lifetime kills
1.26K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 4 players
1,867Matches
46.5%Match win rate ยท Top 50% of Level 4 players
29.5%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy ยท Top 25% of Level 4 players
4,639MVPs
801Hours (in match)
1,646Bombs planted
455Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,936
AWP4,932
MAC-101,490
AUG1,183
MP91,118
P90964

Lifetime map wins

2,025inferno
1,783dust2
1,519cbble
799nuke
469train
337vertigo
119office
116italy

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

46Matches
52%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
78.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke944%1.0714.6
Mirage650%0.8813.7
Cache425%1.1918.3
Anubis475%1.2615.0
Ancient1100%0.9110.0
Inferno1100%0.7120.0
Dust210%0.8916.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.8ยฐPreaim
569msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
10.66HE damage / grenade
9.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.497 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3668% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy โ†’Ancient grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11โ€“13-0.0419%17 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0015%17 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0218%17 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0229%17 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0129%15 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0831%15 Sept โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0217%8 Sept โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.116%8 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0515%8 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.1527%8 Sept โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.118%7 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0215%7 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.1113%7 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0523%7 Sept โ†’
inferno15โ€“150.0413%7 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0223%6 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.026%6 Sept โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0915%6 Sept โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0419%6 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0625%5 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.1019%5 Sept โ†’
cache2โ€“13-0.1233%5 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0210%4 Sept โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0426%4 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“16-0.0128%4 Sept โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0111%3 Sept โ†’
ancient6โ€“130.0121%3 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0323%3 Sept โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0316%3 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“130.0019%2 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0216%2 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0021%2 Sept โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0121%2 Sept โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.063%1 Sept โ†’
cache4โ€“00.010%1 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.017%1 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0415%1 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.036%1 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“00.0320%1 Sept โ†’
ancient5โ€“130.0114%20 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“12-0.0317%20 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“4-0.028%20 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“60.1530%19 Aug โ†’
ancient7โ€“130.016%18 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0319%9 Aug โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.065%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“10.0822%2 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0514%2 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.058%30 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“60.117%30 Jul โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0710%29 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.1218%29 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“70.0519%29 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0121%29 Jul โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.0212%28 Jul โ†’
ancient12โ€“16-0.0510%28 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“11-0.0414%27 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0429%27 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“30.0413%27 Jul โ†’
ancient2โ€“13-0.0817%27 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“4-0.0413%26 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0124%26 Jul โ†’
mirage14โ€“16-0.0211%26 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“7-0.0116%26 Jul โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.078%26 Jul โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0218%24 Jul โ†’
mirage7โ€“130.0013%23 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“160.0116%23 Jul โ†’
inferno12โ€“16-0.0516%20 Jul โ†’
anubis5โ€“13-0.1017%19 Jul โ†’
cache15โ€“150.0326%19 Jul โ†’
ancient1โ€“13-0.0429%19 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“30.0815%15 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0216%13 Jul โ†’
ancient7โ€“130.0717%7 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.0633%7 Jul โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0325%4 Jul โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0112%4 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.0224%12 Jun โ†’
inferno8โ€“8-0.0419%20 May โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.115%19 May โ†’
overpass3โ€“13-0.0416%19 May โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0619%18 May โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.0326%15 May โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0222%11 May โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0364%11 May โ†’
inferno9โ€“30.0631%11 May โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0930%11 May โ†’
cache13โ€“4-0.0517%5 May โ†’
cache13โ€“00.0330%5 May โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.0229%13 Apr โ†’
inferno9โ€“7-0.0230%8 Apr โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.029%2 Apr โ†’
inferno7โ€“90.0429%1 Apr โ†’
inferno6โ€“9-0.1044%31 Mar โ†’
inferno0โ€“9-0.3275%31 Mar โ†’
inferno3โ€“9-0.0123%31 Mar โ†’
inferno3โ€“9-0.2211%26 Mar โ†’
inferno4โ€“9-0.1821%26 Mar โ†’
inferno9โ€“3-0.1050%26 Mar โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’