Padrinho

Padrinho — CS2 Stats

MZ76561198145986778[U:1:185721050]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,147Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,722Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70697 of 251780 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,458 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,722 -2 1 Sept – 13 Oct · 17 days played
20,00021,406peak 21,4061 Sept13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,458 +0 1 Sept – 6 Oct · 6 observations
1,4581,458peak 1,4581 Sept6 Oct
21,406Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,458Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,458
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 684 below peak (21,406)
  • +372 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,278 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPadrinhoFACEITLevel 7 · 1,458 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,722 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,458csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time606ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 9 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 23 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA1912–763%0.01
infernoC166–1038%0.01
nukeD155–1033%0.01
ancientS1410–471%0.00
dust2D122–1017%-0.01
mirageB115–645%0.02
anubisA117–464%0.02
train—11–0100%0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

452Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
74.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7353%1.0316.1
Mirage7145%0.9914.9
Nuke6157%0.9615.3
Dust24753%0.9714.7
Ancient4358%1.2418.3
Anubis3551%1.1915.6
Cache2540%0.8512.3
Overpass520%1.1915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.4%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
617msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.64HE damage / grenade
6.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.9032% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0420%13 Oct →
dust24–130.0024%13 Oct →
inferno13–60.0523%13 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0414%13 Oct →
cache13–90.0233%13 Oct →
ancient8–130.0820%13 Oct →
cache4–0-0.0025%12 Oct →
inferno13–70.0417%12 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0532%9 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0616%9 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0521%9 Oct →
cache4–13-0.1045%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0417%9 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0036%9 Oct →
ancient22–19-0.0524%9 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0616%9 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0626%8 Oct →
inferno13–160.0413%8 Oct →
cache13–50.0519%8 Oct →
inferno10–130.0616%8 Oct →
cache13–60.0924%7 Oct →
cache13–50.0421%7 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0118%5 Oct →
mirage9–130.0413%5 Oct →
anubis13–60.0112%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0515%5 Oct →
nuke13–50.2019%1 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0645%30 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.046%30 Sept →
train13–90.0317%30 Sept →
nuke2–130.0421%30 Sept →
anubis13–100.0825%30 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0317%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0416%28 Sept →
anubis13–30.0519%28 Sept →
cache13–60.1819%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0429%28 Sept →
inferno10–130.0126%28 Sept →
mirage13–90.0414%28 Sept →
nuke13–20.0610%28 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0313%25 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0134%25 Sept →
ancient11–130.1025%25 Sept →
dust213–30.0621%25 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0217%25 Sept →
inferno12–120.018%25 Sept →
mirage13–100.0225%24 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0223%24 Sept →
ancient13–100.0320%23 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0318%23 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0126%23 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0225%23 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0322%22 Sept →
ancient19–17-0.0318%22 Sept →
nuke14–160.0513%22 Sept →
inferno16–120.0422%21 Sept →
mirage16–130.0310%21 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.027%21 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0112%20 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0725%20 Sept →
ancient13–30.0816%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0314%18 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0427%18 Sept →
mirage11–130.1239%17 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0021%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0320%17 Sept →
cache13–100.078%17 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.075%16 Sept →
cache6–10.0525%16 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0735%16 Sept →
inferno10–20.0229%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0313%15 Sept →
nuke13–40.0921%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.0621%14 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0322%10 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0127%10 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0311%10 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0117%10 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0016%10 Sept →
dust210–130.0520%10 Sept →
cache13–40.0025%10 Sept →
mirage2–130.048%9 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0410%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0815%8 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0517%7 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0528%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0021%7 Sept →
inferno13–50.0922%7 Sept →
dust213–100.0424%7 Sept →
inferno12–120.0119%7 Sept →
ancient13–00.0116%7 Sept →
cache10–130.0421%7 Sept →
nuke13–110.0223%7 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0433%7 Sept →
cache7–130.0426%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0313%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0117%4 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0119%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0318%4 Sept →
cache13–70.0538%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.