保存

保存 — CS2 Stats

MZ76561198145986778[U:1:185721050]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,031Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,489Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,350Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68417 of 220468 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,458 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,350 -187 7 Aug14 Sept · 15 days played
20,00021,406peak 21,4067 Aug14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,458 +0 1 Sept6 Sept · 2 observations
1,4581,458peak 1,4581 Sept6 Sept
21,406Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,458Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,458
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,056 below peak (21,406)
  • +350 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,650 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.2%45.8%46.8%4.6% short
Shot accuracy14.4%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.051.06above
Match win rate40.3%45.7%46.3%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG保存FACEITLevel 7 · 1,458 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,350 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,458csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning66
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40591Last 10040%Win rateLWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility3.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.6
Utility3.7
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time600ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 17 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 21 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 17 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 7 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 53% over 15mirageWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2281436%-0.01
cacheC1871139%-0.00
nukeB158753%0.00
anubisC135838%0.01
mirageD123925%-0.00
ancientB115645%-0.02
dust2B84450%-0.00
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

147,851Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,040Matches
40.3%Match win rate
42.2%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
15,735MVPs
2,489Hours (in match)
3,660Bombs planted
1,342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4743,444
AWP24,617
P2504,691
SSG 082,904
Tec-92,284
FAMAS2,207

Lifetime map wins

8,579inferno
6,349dust2
4,680nuke
2,244train
1,750cbble
1,063vertigo
426office
181lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

362Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
75.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5954%1.0316.1
Mirage5946%1.0615.8
Nuke4161%0.9515.1
Dust23462%1.0916.4
Anubis3152%1.1815.7
Ancient2854%1.2819.2
Cache1436%0.8412.1
Overpass520%1.1915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
573msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
9.99HE damage / grenade
2.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3834 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.1239%17 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0021%17 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0320%17 Sept
cache13–100.078%17 Sept
nuke4–9-0.075%16 Sept
cache6–10.0525%16 Sept
dust27–13-0.0735%16 Sept
inferno10–20.0229%16 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0313%15 Sept
nuke13–40.0921%15 Sept
anubis13–80.0621%14 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0322%10 Sept
cache8–13-0.0127%10 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0311%10 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0117%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0016%10 Sept
dust210–130.0520%10 Sept
cache13–40.0025%10 Sept
mirage2–130.048%9 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0410%9 Sept
anubis13–90.0815%8 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0517%7 Sept
cache5–13-0.0528%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0021%7 Sept
inferno13–50.0922%7 Sept
dust213–100.0424%7 Sept
inferno12–120.0119%7 Sept
ancient13–00.0116%7 Sept
cache10–130.0421%7 Sept
nuke13–110.0223%7 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0433%7 Sept
cache7–130.0426%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0313%4 Sept
dust24–13-0.0117%4 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0119%4 Sept
dust24–13-0.0318%4 Sept
cache13–70.0538%3 Sept
inferno13–60.0523%3 Sept
anubis11–130.0219%3 Sept
ancient6–130.0121%3 Sept
mirage9–13-0.059%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.029%3 Sept
anubis13–70.0613%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0429%3 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0120%2 Sept
nuke13–60.0410%2 Sept
cache13–90.0529%2 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0313%2 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0818%1 Sept
cache4–00.0515%1 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0028%1 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0310%1 Sept
mirage9–130.0119%1 Sept
nuke13–0-0.0422%1 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0325%31 Aug
mirage10–130.0324%31 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0419%31 Aug
cache10–13-0.0513%31 Aug
cache2–13-0.089%31 Aug
train4–13-0.0136%30 Aug
mirage5–40.0130%30 Aug
nuke13–60.0121%21 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1033%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0619%21 Aug
cache2–13-0.0950%21 Aug
inferno13–8-0.016%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0223%20 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0614%20 Aug
dust216–120.0226%20 Aug
anubis11–130.0116%20 Aug
inferno8–130.0229%20 Aug
nuke13–110.1133%19 Aug
nuke9–60.0929%19 Aug
cache5–13-0.0316%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0327%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0518%18 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1115%18 Aug
cache13–10-0.0121%18 Aug
anubis6–130.006%18 Aug
anubis13–110.1031%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0613%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0010%18 Aug
nuke13–110.0134%18 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0519%17 Aug
dust213–80.0113%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0321%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0713%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0428%16 Aug
cache5–130.0420%16 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0233%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0511%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.0817%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.027%12 Aug
dust213–9-0.0416%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0113%11 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0337%11 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0411%10 Aug
mirage13–100.0029%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0620%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0023%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →