meytriX

meytriX — CS2 Stats

DE76561198140014315[U:1:179748587]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,340Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,331Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,000 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.8%46.8%48.2%1.5% short
Shot accuracy4.7%13.0%13.3%8.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.061.070.09 short
Match win rate45.9%46.3%46.9%1.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmeytriXFACEITLevel 8 · 2,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning49
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–54Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.0pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time617ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 24 May →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · ancient, 13 May →
445msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 11 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 24 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 25ancientWeakest map · 34% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD3211–2134%-0.01
anubisA2515–1060%0.00
infernoB189–950%0.01
nukeB136–746%0.01
overpassC52–340%0.01
dust2—31–233%0.03
cache—32–167%0.01
mirage—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (34% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,794Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,375Matches
45.9%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot %
4.7%Shot accuracy
7,857MVPs
1,331Hours (in match)
3,249Bombs planted
949Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,774
AWP3,186
MAC-101,533
FAMAS1,492
Knife1,211

Lifetime map wins

6,786inferno
6,052dust2
3,708nuke
1,221vertigo
369train
91cbble
63italy
54office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,304Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
80.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient35654%1.0216.4
Anubis30853%0.9916.1
Inferno27149%1.0015.9
Nuke16950%1.0316.0
Dust211738%0.9214.7
Mirage2544%0.8815.4
Overpass2442%1.0319.4
Train2045%1.0115.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
614msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
5.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

34% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.059%31 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.024%31 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0210%31 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0225%31 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.028%31 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0512%11 Aug →
inferno13–50.0323%11 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.1011%11 Aug →
dust213–60.0219%21 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.039%17 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0124%17 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0532%7 Jul →
inferno13–60.0425%7 Jul →
anubis13–80.0312%7 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0520%7 Jul →
ancient13–80.0418%7 Jul →
overpass11–13-0.0025%27 Jun →
cache13–90.0220%27 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0311%27 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0014%27 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0617%23 Jun →
dust29–13-0.039%23 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0614%16 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0622%16 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0220%16 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.088%16 Jun →
inferno16–140.0228%16 Jun →
overpass3–130.0024%14 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0312%13 Jun →
inferno13–70.0419%9 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0616%9 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0114%8 Jun →
ancient13–90.0015%8 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0318%8 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0125%8 Jun →
inferno10–130.0314%6 Jun →
ancient14–160.0223%4 Jun →
inferno10–130.0321%4 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.0213%4 Jun →
anubis13–100.0017%31 May →
ancient13–9-0.029%31 May →
anubis14–16-0.0120%30 May →
inferno13–5-0.0215%24 May →
anubis13–60.1310%24 May →
ancient5–13-0.0223%24 May →
ancient13–8-0.0115%21 May →
anubis10–130.0312%20 May →
anubis13–60.015%20 May →
ancient13–8-0.0014%20 May →
ancient11–13-0.0019%18 May →
nuke13–20.0427%18 May →
anubis13–10-0.0324%14 May →
ancient13–100.0133%13 May →
anubis13–9-0.0317%5 May →
ancient11–130.0419%3 May →
cache6–13-0.0314%29 Apr →
cache13–110.0425%29 Apr →
anubis11–130.0218%25 Apr →
anubis13–100.0319%25 Apr →
inferno11–130.0016%25 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0119%25 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0012%25 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.069%25 Apr →
inferno13–80.0717%25 Apr →
ancient13–70.0410%25 Apr →
anubis13–100.0020%24 Apr →
nuke13–00.0910%24 Apr →
nuke13–10.1222%24 Apr →
ancient17–190.0216%21 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0219%21 Apr →
overpass12–160.0618%21 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0417%21 Apr →
ancient13–100.0525%21 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.087%20 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0219%19 Apr →
overpass13–60.0120%19 Apr →
anubis16–130.0012%18 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0221%18 Apr →
ancient11–130.0518%18 Apr →
ancient13–80.0120%18 Apr →
anubis8–130.0126%18 Apr →
anubis13–80.0423%18 Apr →
nuke13–70.0826%18 Apr →
nuke13–160.0215%18 Apr →
ancient7–130.0023%17 Apr →
nuke13–80.0128%17 Apr →
inferno6–130.0419%17 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.045%17 Apr →
inferno5–130.1026%17 Apr →
inferno16–13-0.0316%16 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.018%16 Apr →
nuke14–160.0322%13 Apr →
nuke9–130.0319%13 Apr →
anubis13–60.0021%12 Apr →
inferno10–130.0420%12 Apr →
anubis13–80.0514%12 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0219%12 Apr →
dust25–130.0821%9 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0412%8 Apr →
ancient16–190.0113%5 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.