w1ck3d

w1ck3d — CS2 Stats

DE76561197962905833[U:1:2640105]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,291Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,987Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,545 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,545 → 1,545
+34Tracked matches · now 1,291
−3.5ppWin rate · 58.6% → 55.2%

Rating over time

1,545Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-02-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,545
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 206 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches38——
Win rate47%——
K/D0.95——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.6%46.8%48.2%1.6% short
Shot accuracy15.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.841.061.070.23 short
Match win rate47.4%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGw1ck3dFACEITLevel 8 · 1,545 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,545csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning47
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time582ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 25 Apr →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · inferno, 23 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 2 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 8 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2611–1542%-0.01
infernoA2313–1057%-0.01
nukeB178–947%-0.01
anubisB158–753%-0.01
cacheS75–271%0.00
dust2D61–517%-0.02
mirageC52–340%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,712Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
4,101Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
46.6%Headshot %
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,402MVPs
2,533Hours (in match)
5,564Bombs planted
1,084Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,878
AWP8,999
FAMAS2,673
Knife2,491
P2501,627

Lifetime map wins

12,586inferno
4,048dust2
2,826nuke
1,922train
1,031cbble
464vertigo
33office
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,292Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
72.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20851%1.0214.8
Inferno20852%0.9614.3
Anubis13849%1.0014.8
Nuke11054%0.9814.3
Mirage5643%0.9414.6
Dust25334%0.8513.2
Overpass1747%0.9814.8
Cache1540%0.9012.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
581msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.84HE damage / grenade
7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0414%26 Sept →
inferno13–100.0420%26 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0514%19 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0318%16 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0320%7 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.025%15 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0218%10 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0715%9 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0225%5 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0818%25 Jul →
anubis13–110.0523%23 Jul →
nuke13–20.0832%23 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0521%22 Jul →
dust213–60.0524%21 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.078%8 Jul →
ancient19–17-0.0214%8 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0612%6 Jul →
inferno9–130.0126%2 Jul →
inferno13–30.0313%2 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0120%2 Jul →
dust20–7-0.0920%24 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0538%23 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0323%23 Jun →
cache12–120.0136%21 Jun →
nuke13–30.0327%21 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.079%11 Jun →
cache13–90.0230%10 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0224%10 Jun →
cache13–5-0.0711%10 Jun →
nuke11–130.0226%9 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0311%8 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0134%8 Jun →
anubis11–130.0616%8 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.095%6 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0312%1 Jun →
nuke9–130.0327%1 Jun →
anubis14–16-0.0015%30 May →
inferno13–50.0828%24 May →
dust28–13-0.049%22 May →
ancient13–80.0518%21 May →
overpass13–90.0222%21 May →
anubis10–13-0.0220%20 May →
anubis13–6-0.0024%20 May →
ancient13–80.0324%20 May →
nuke19–220.0127%19 May →
ancient8–13-0.0515%10 May →
anubis8–13-0.0712%7 May →
ancient12–160.0014%6 May →
inferno4–13-0.0514%6 May →
inferno7–13-0.0717%26 Apr →
inferno13–80.0222%26 Apr →
inferno13–110.0021%25 Apr →
inferno13–90.0325%25 Apr →
cache7–13-0.0116%25 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.036%25 Apr →
cache13–30.1422%25 Apr →
anubis7–130.0116%24 Apr →
ancient13–90.0321%23 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0113%23 Apr →
cache13–10-0.043%23 Apr →
inferno16–13-0.0519%20 Apr →
nuke13–5-0.0323%20 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0414%20 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0615%18 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0419%13 Apr →
nuke16–12-0.0421%13 Apr →
anubis13–110.0338%11 Apr →
ancient6–130.0027%10 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.039%10 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0126%22 Mar →
anubis13–6-0.0218%22 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0416%22 Mar →
nuke13–70.0620%21 Mar →
anubis13–10-0.019%18 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0726%13 Mar →
mirage13–30.0221%13 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0224%12 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.055%4 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0115%4 Mar →
inferno13–60.0428%3 Mar →
mirage13–40.0732%3 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0519%1 Mar →
nuke13–100.0215%1 Mar →
nuke12–16-0.0026%25 Feb →
inferno13–70.0724%25 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0211%22 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0523%22 Feb →
inferno13–7-0.0033%22 Feb →
ancient13–100.0624%19 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0513%18 Feb →
dust214–160.0033%16 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0027%16 Feb →
ancient7–130.0433%14 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0214%12 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0425%10 Feb →
nuke13–16-0.0227%10 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0416%9 Feb →
inferno16–19-0.0120%8 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.0215%8 Feb →
ancient4–130.0026%5 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.