Trayhome

Trayhome — CS2 Stats

AT76561198124325019[U:1:164059291]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,191Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,710Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,575Light Blue band · top ~56.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,191 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,575 -6,505 12 Jan – 12 Nov · 26 days played
9,57517,038peak 17,03812 Jan12 Nov
17,038Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-01-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,463 below peak (17,038)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 425 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-11-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.4%42.7%43.8%2.3% short
Shot accuracy14.4%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.000.991.02meets
Match win rate41.7%43.9%44.7%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrayhomeFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER9,575 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning48
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −8.5pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 689ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility4.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 670ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning4.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time694ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 711ms → last ⅓ avg 694ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−8.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 17 Feb →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · anubis, 11 May →
500msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 2 Nov →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 25 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 25mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2515–1060%-0.01
ancientC207–1335%-0.03
cacheD144–1029%-0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.02
overpassC114–736%-0.03
nukeD51–420%-0.01
mirageD50–50%0.00
dust2D51–420%-0.05
debris—10–10%-0.06
warden—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,972Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
5,237Matches
41.7%Match win rate
41.4%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11,410MVPs
2,148Hours (in match)
4,443Bombs planted
1,164Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,935inferno
4,209dust2
1,931nuke
1,474cbble
1,194vertigo
855train
251office
193lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

151Matches
48%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
69.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2255%0.9713.6
Inferno1040%0.8914.2
Anubis450%0.9414.5
Dust2367%0.8712.7
Vertigo250%0.8510.0
Overpass10%1.2525.0
Ancient10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
26.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.0%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
670msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
2.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2129° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.323 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–130.0818%4 Nov →
nuke3–13-0.0119%2 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.069%2 Nov →
mirage13–160.0214%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0812%29 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0311%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0119%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.047%23 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0720%7 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0516%17 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0319%17 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0124%13 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0238%11 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0115%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0720%1 Aug →
anubis10–130.0426%1 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0124%1 Aug →
inferno13–60.0721%1 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0527%27 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0814%27 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0214%16 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0422%16 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0717%13 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0119%13 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0715%10 Jul →
cache13–80.0423%10 Jul →
mirage15–150.0115%10 Jul →
debris5–9-0.0617%9 Jul →
nuke5–130.0110%9 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0417%6 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0219%6 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.036%29 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.049%27 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.059%27 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0610%25 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.069%19 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0611%18 Jun →
inferno13–90.0537%18 Jun →
anubis13–50.016%18 Jun →
ancient13–60.0119%18 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.027%15 Jun →
ancient0–50.0027%12 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0219%12 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0320%9 Jun →
overpass13–30.0218%9 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0720%8 Jun →
inferno13–80.0041%2 Jun →
anubis13–30.0122%2 Jun →
warden13–10-0.0115%30 May →
cache12–12-0.0422%30 May →
ancient9–13-0.1214%27 May →
overpass13–8-0.0120%27 May →
overpass7–13-0.0616%25 May →
anubis13–8-0.0314%25 May →
inferno13–20.0625%25 May →
ancient4–13-0.0521%25 May →
ancient8–130.0230%21 May →
nuke14–16-0.0225%19 May →
dust24–13-0.0430%19 May →
dust213–9-0.0822%18 May →
ancient9–13-0.0520%18 May →
overpass13–60.0133%14 May →
inferno13–40.0433%14 May →
ancient13–160.0124%14 May →
inferno11–13-0.0513%13 May →
inferno13–10-0.0330%13 May →
cache4–13-0.0617%13 May →
cache13–50.0528%13 May →
anubis13–4-0.0041%11 May →
inferno4–13-0.0717%11 May →
inferno5–13-0.0123%10 May →
cache10–13-0.0320%10 May →
cache5–13-0.0323%10 May →
cache13–90.0039%9 May →
cache9–13-0.0232%29 Apr →
cache8–130.0024%29 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0221%3 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0621%28 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0428%16 Mar →
inferno13–90.0224%10 Mar →
mirage7–130.0636%10 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0517%10 Mar →
inferno13–100.0521%2 Mar →
inferno13–40.0426%22 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0028%22 Feb →
overpass16–130.0213%17 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0223%17 Feb →
inferno13–50.1330%17 Feb →
anubis9–13-0.0632%9 Feb →
inferno13–7-0.0426%9 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0132%8 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0037%8 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0318%6 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0711%6 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0726%23 Jan →
overpass8–13-0.0122%16 Jan →
ancient16–12-0.0118%16 Jan →
overpass7–13-0.0434%12 Jan →
ancient13–40.0422%12 Jan →
overpass11–13-0.0734%12 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.