B1LAL👻 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198117722949[U:1:157457221]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,616Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,570Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating19,407Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#89557 of 247904 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,595 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,407 +3,720 27 Jul – 28 Sept · 23 days played

19,669Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,595Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

27Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,595
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 156 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

262 below peak (19,669)
+2,340 over 30 days · improving
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 593 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,870), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	36.2%	45.7%	46.8%	10.6% short
Shot accuracy	15.5%	12.7%	13.0%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.04	1.05	1.06	meets
Match win rate	38.3%	45.7%	46.3%	8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning70

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWTWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–2–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

10–9–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.2

Utility4.5

Positioning7.0

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning7.0

Utility4.5

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels5.5

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time571ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms

Headshot accuracy19.1%+4.2%

first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 21 Sept →

48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · inferno, 16 Sept →

422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 23 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · cache, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 21dust2Weakest map · 39% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
cache	S	21	14–7	67%	0.04
inferno	B	17	9–8	53%	0.02
ancient	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
mirage	B	13	6–7	46%	0.02
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

178,658Lifetime kills

1.04K/D

8,899Matches

38.3%Match win rate

36.2%Headshot %

15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

15,846MVPs

3,268Hours (in match)

7,219Bombs planted

1,796Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4763,418

M4A4 / M4A1-S33,088

AWP14,031

Desert Eagle6,804

P2000 / USP-S6,701

Glock-185,112

P2504,271

FAMAS4,119

UMP-453,778

Knife3,706

Lifetime map wins

23,989dust2

9,961inferno

2,966cbble

1,650nuke

1,370train

862vertigo

185office

158aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

612Matches

52%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

83.7ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	29	55%	1.21	18.5
Dust2	25	52%	1.05	16.0
Ancient	19	47%	1.17	19.1
Inferno	13	62%	1.25	17.2
Nuke	11	45%	0.98	14.0
Anubis	8	25%	1.07	17.1
Overpass	6	17%	1.28	17.3
Train	3	33%	1.00	19.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.1%Spray accuracy

74.8%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

579msReaction time

41.8%T opening success

62.4%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

8.62HE damage / grenade

7.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4568 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–10	0.04	23%	28 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	10%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	13%	28 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	15%	28 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	28%	28 Sept →
cache	16–14	0.01	13%	25 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	31%	25 Sept →
ancient	4–13	0.02	15%	25 Sept →
inferno	16–13	0.03	12%	23 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	13%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.00	22%	23 Sept →
cache	13–1	0.03	9%	23 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	18%	23 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.06	18%	23 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.04	23%	22 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.03	17%	22 Sept →
cache	16–14	0.05	12%	22 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.04	16%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.16	35%	21 Sept →
inferno	1–13	-0.03	20%	21 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.08	34%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.02	30%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	29%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–3	0.06	11%	16 Sept →
inferno	13–1	0.13	48%	16 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.05	7%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–2	0.10	20%	7 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.00	21%	7 Sept →
anubis	5–13	0.01	13%	7 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.00	10%	6 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	13%	6 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.01	14%	6 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	17%	6 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.06	27%	6 Sept →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	22%	1 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.02	12%	1 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.13	27%	1 Sept →
cache	14–16	0.01	9%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.01	12%	26 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.08	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	24%	25 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	19%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	24%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	6%	24 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	9%	24 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	21%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	8%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	11%	19 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	19%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.00	13%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	10%	18 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	15%	18 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	9%	18 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.01	17%	17 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	21%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	29%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	16%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.11	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.06	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	20%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.02	25%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	10%	15 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.03	22%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	9%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	28%	14 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.07	9%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	12%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	10%	3 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.06	17%	1 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.05	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	16%	1 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	19%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.11	21%	1 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	20%	1 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	9%	29 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.03	8%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	11%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.11	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.06	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	5%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	18%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.05	28%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	11%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	13%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	13%	26 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.09	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	12%	25 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	10%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	10%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.13	16%	24 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	13%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.01	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	23%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.11	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	12%	23 Jul →