GeR_LuKe

GeR_LuKe — CS2 Stats

DE76561198062476341[U:1:102210613]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,799Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,859Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,145Top 25% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31098 of 259519 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,623 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,145 +3,231 7 Sept – 1 Nov · 26 days played
19,29826,081peak 26,0817 Sept1 Nov
26,081Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,623Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-09-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,623
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,936 below peak (26,081)
  • +128 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 855 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.1%46.8%48.2%2.1% short
Shot accuracy13.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07above
Match win rate60.6%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGeR_LuKeFACEITLevel 8 · 1,623 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,145 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,623csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning68
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.6
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time627ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 20 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · anubis, 1 Nov →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · dust2, 23 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 19anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2212–1055%0.01
cacheS1913–668%0.04
infernoC188–1044%0.02
ancientB147–750%0.04
mirageB126–650%0.01
anubisC114–736%0.01
nuke—40–40%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

299,387Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15,770Matches
60.6%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players
46.1%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
28,200MVPs
6,347Hours (in match)
16,516Bombs planted
3,207Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47123,207
AWP14,905
P2507,220
Tec-96,792
UMP-455,188

Lifetime map wins

22,010inferno
21,262dust2
4,389cbble
3,605nuke
2,607train
1,892vertigo
356office
207dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,422Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
74.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6149%1.0013.4
Ancient6159%1.0415.4
Dust22948%1.0314.4
Nuke1747%0.8414.1
Anubis1619%0.8915.1
Mirage1242%0.9915.0
Overpass1136%0.8913.8
Cache956%0.9115.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.8%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
624msReaction time
62.6%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
10.22HE damage / grenade
5.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–70.0340%1 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0227%1 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0413%1 Nov →
cache9–130.0711%1 Nov →
nuke2–13-0.0121%1 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0118%30 Oct →
mirage13–30.1026%30 Oct →
anubis10–130.0521%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0220%30 Oct →
cache13–110.0017%30 Oct →
inferno13–20.0714%30 Oct →
mirage11–130.0218%29 Oct →
inferno8–130.0017%29 Oct →
cache10–90.0627%29 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0511%28 Oct →
anubis13–110.0123%28 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0316%28 Oct →
dust215–150.0717%26 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0124%26 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0426%25 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0524%25 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0113%25 Oct →
ancient13–40.0119%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0116%23 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0612%23 Oct →
cache13–90.0225%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0627%19 Oct →
cache13–100.0521%19 Oct →
inferno16–140.0425%19 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0226%18 Oct →
dust213–70.0622%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0416%14 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0231%14 Oct →
inferno8–130.0524%14 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0310%13 Oct →
cache13–50.0815%13 Oct →
anubis4–130.0217%13 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0528%8 Oct →
anubis14–160.0117%8 Oct →
cache13–40.1619%8 Oct →
anubis13–50.0825%2 Oct →
ancient13–70.0021%2 Oct →
cache0–5-0.060%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.0623%2 Oct →
inferno13–50.0519%1 Oct →
ancient13–20.0823%1 Oct →
dust22–13-0.037%30 Sept →
cache13–80.0618%30 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0115%30 Sept →
inferno13–100.1030%28 Sept →
dust215–150.0515%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0231%28 Sept →
ancient7–130.0317%28 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0413%28 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0217%25 Sept →
inferno10–130.0219%25 Sept →
ancient4–130.0924%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0520%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0827%24 Sept →
cache13–100.0117%24 Sept →
cache9–130.0321%24 Sept →
nuke5–130.0516%24 Sept →
inferno16–130.0222%23 Sept →
nuke5–130.0323%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0626%23 Sept →
cache13–10.1523%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0515%23 Sept →
cache13–40.0517%23 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0615%22 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0316%22 Sept →
cache16–140.0319%22 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0017%21 Sept →
mirage13–20.0625%21 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.066%21 Sept →
cache13–60.0523%20 Sept →
ancient13–60.1819%20 Sept →
inferno8–130.0720%20 Sept →
dust216–120.0830%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.0524%20 Sept →
mirage3–130.0926%20 Sept →
ancient11–130.0420%19 Sept →
ancient10–130.0221%19 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0417%19 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0129%16 Sept →
ancient13–30.0729%16 Sept →
inferno13–1-0.032%16 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0417%16 Sept →
inferno13–70.1127%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0718%14 Sept →
cache15–150.0218%14 Sept →
inferno9–130.0015%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0715%9 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0223%9 Sept →
ancient14–160.0616%9 Sept →
anubis11–130.0318%8 Sept →
ancient13–160.019%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0225%8 Sept →
ancient13–20.1023%7 Sept →
dust27–130.0015%7 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0731%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.