Kaotisk®

Kaotisk® — CS2 Stats

76561198107375188[U:1:147109460]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

359Tracked matches36%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,837Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.8 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3 · 876 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 876 → 876
+2Tracked matches · now 359
0.0ppWin rate · 35.7% → 35.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 19 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,550 +4,073 21 Apr2 Aug · 24 days played
6,54912,728peak 12,72821 Apr2 Aug
12,919Peak Premier in tracked matches
876Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-04-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 876
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 25 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate29.3%41.9%42.7%13.4% short
Shot accuracy19.6%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.290.981.00above
Match win rate68.7%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKaotisk®FACEITLevel 3 · 876 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO876csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim40
Positioning41
Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43525Last 10043%Win rateLLLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · −107ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim4.0
Utility1.3
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.0
Positioning4.1
Utility1.3
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact0.2

Composite 2.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time673ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 673ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · overpass, 19 Jun
34%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 6 Aug
469msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 28 Aug
13–2Biggest win · cache, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L8Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 57% over 7infernoWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C34142041%-0.01
mirageB189950%-0.02
cacheA116555%-0.04
ancientA116555%-0.02
infernoD7070%-0.00
overpassA74357%-0.01
nukeD62433%-0.04
anubisD62433%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,761Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
5,721Matches
68.7%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 3 players
29.3%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 3 players
7,300MVPs
1,058Hours (in match)
1,540Bombs planted
492Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,453dust2
1,603inferno
708nuke
354office
317train
267cbble
246lake
146bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
39%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
58.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%0.7010.8
Dust2520%0.529.2
Inferno450%0.7911.3
Ancient250%1.2013.0
Anubis1100%0.5211.0
Nuke10%0.7512.0
Train10%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
675msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
30.4%CT opening success
0.23Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
6.95HE damage / grenade
1.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3832% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2328 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0413%7 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0116%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0421%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.075%29 Aug
dust27–13-0.059%29 Aug
nuke7–13-0.038%28 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0416%27 Aug
cache6–13-0.0734%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0028%6 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0414%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.084%2 Aug
mirage13–80.019%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0016%31 Jul
nuke11–20.017%31 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0613%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0114%31 Jul
dust215–15-0.0113%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0315%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0216%27 Jul
dust213–6-0.0712%22 Jul
cache13–80.0012%22 Jul
mirage13–3-0.014%22 Jul
ancient10–130.019%22 Jul
dust215–15-0.0121%22 Jul
cache13–2-0.1023%22 Jul
dust21–13-0.1011%18 Jul
anubis7–130.056%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0411%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.044%16 Jul
dust213–7-0.0315%16 Jul
dust26–130.0018%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.115%16 Jul
dust213–110.0215%14 Jul
dust213–90.0212%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0216%14 Jul
ancient13–80.056%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.0717%14 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0413%13 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0525%13 Jul
dust28–130.0128%13 Jul
anubis13–160.045%3 Jul
dust213–110.0419%3 Jul
dust215–150.0317%2 Jul
ancient13–4-0.027%1 Jul
dust213–5-0.0010%1 Jul
overpass12–16-0.0126%1 Jul
mirage10–130.0814%27 Jun
dust213–9-0.008%25 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0217%25 Jun
nuke4–13-0.076%24 Jun
overpass3–2-0.0110%24 Jun
inferno1–6-0.077%23 Jun
mirage10–130.009%22 Jun
ancient16–12-0.0613%22 Jun
overpass8–13-0.096%20 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0717%20 Jun
dust25–13-0.043%20 Jun
overpass13–100.129%19 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0411%19 Jun
dust213–7-0.0121%19 Jun
cache4–13-0.0229%5 Jun
dust21–13-0.0714%5 Jun
mirage13–70.0118%3 Jun
ancient1–13-0.090%28 May
dust213–50.065%28 May
ancient13–50.0710%28 May
anubis13–40.064%27 May
mirage13–30.019%27 May
anubis13–5-0.039%27 May
dust213–70.0016%26 May
dust29–13-0.0012%26 May
cache5–13-0.0614%19 May
ancient5–13-0.0511%19 May
cache13–110.0014%16 May
overpass2–13-0.0512%16 May
nuke7–13-0.0223%16 May
cache13–6-0.0925%6 May
inferno8–130.0222%2 May
cache13–11-0.0112%29 Apr
cache13–7-0.0414%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.0514%29 Apr
inferno11–130.0514%26 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0011%26 Apr
overpass13–4-0.033%26 Apr
anubis5–13-0.079%24 Apr
inferno4–130.0912%24 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0510%23 Apr
dust213–9-0.0411%23 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0210%23 Apr
ancient6–13-0.062%22 Apr
dust213–7-0.070%22 Apr
ancient15–15-0.088%22 Apr
dust26–130.0214%21 Apr
dust22–130.0818%21 Apr
dust26–13-0.069%21 Apr
dust212–12-0.0311%21 Apr
dust211–130.0314%20 Apr
dust213–100.0213%19 Apr
inferno4–11-0.040%19 Apr
dust213–4-0.0130%19 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →