FaZe SM0KE — CS2 Stats

76561198272941266[U:1:312675538]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,092Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,517Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2324 of 11964 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,648 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning57

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–47–8Last 10045%Win rateLWLWTWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6

Aggression6.6

Utility5.5

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning5.7

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time558ms−4ms

first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms

Headshot accuracy15.9%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — debris 9–2

13–1Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	33	14–19	42%	0.02
mirage	A	21	12–9	57%	0.02
cache	D	15	5–10	33%	0.03
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	0.04
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.19
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

380Matches

51%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

86.8ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	134	51%	1.21	18.2
Mirage	83	46%	1.28	18.1
Nuke	54	65%	1.38	20.0
Ancient	41	44%	1.20	17.5
Inferno	27	59%	1.15	17.2
Anubis	19	42%	1.13	18.7
Overpass	13	69%	1.16	19.8
Train	5	20%	1.07	16.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

78.0%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

559msReaction time

37.2%T opening success

44.1%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

10.69HE damage / grenade

7.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.2249% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	7–13	-0.03	17%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	8%	28 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.02	15%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	22%	28 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.01	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	11%	27 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	20%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	20%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	14%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	18%	22 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	17%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.10	13%	9 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.01	27%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.10	18%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	10%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	6%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.05	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	21%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	13%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.03	16%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.00	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.11	23%	6 Aug →
dust2	19–17	-0.00	6%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	25%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.05	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	9%	3 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	10%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	7%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	15%	1 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	8%	1 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.10	13%	1 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.04	20%	31 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	20%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.09	16%	30 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	14%	29 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.01	13%	29 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	12%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	19%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	23%	26 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.02	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.04	25%	26 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	11%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.04	10%	24 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	31%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.09	15%	20 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.06	16%	19 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.05	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	14%	18 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	12%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.06	18%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	20%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	11%	18 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	13%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	10%	17 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	14%	17 Jul →
debris	9–2	0.19	14%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.10	20%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	21%	15 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.06	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.04	6%	14 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	15%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.13	20%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	12%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	17%	13 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.03	18%	13 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.02	15%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	13%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	27%	12 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.05	18%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	11%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.17	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	14%	9 Jul →
boulder	13–6	0.05	12%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	14%	8 Jul →
dust2	7–0	0.13	21%	8 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	15%	8 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.09	0%	8 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.13	13%	8 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.06	18%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	9%	7 Jul →