baru

baru — CS2 Stats

FI76561198107271508[U:1:147005780]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,054Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,700Top 25% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45288 of 251490 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,296 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,700 +3,991 2 Jun – 13 Oct · 38 days played
17,81622,958peak 22,9582 Jun13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,296 +0 30 Aug – 19 Sept · 5 observations
1,2961,296peak 1,29630 Aug19 Sept
22,958Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,296Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-06-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,296
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 55 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 258 below peak (22,958)
  • +1,548 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,700 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,300 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbaruFACEITLevel 7 · 1,296 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,700 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,296csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWLWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time575ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 1 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 12 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 3 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3522–1363%0.01
ancientC2410–1442%0.00
cacheB126–650%0.03
infernoB126–650%-0.02
anubisS97–278%0.01
nukeC52–340%-0.02
dust2—33–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,676Matches
49%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28548%1.0315.8
Inferno12048%0.9714.8
Ancient11349%0.9415.8
Anubis5050%0.9814.9
Nuke4743%1.1715.8
Overpass2650%1.1116.5
Cache1753%1.0915.4
Dust21450%1.1014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
574msReaction time
41.6%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.59HE damage / grenade
11.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0528%13 Oct →
anubis11–130.0019%13 Oct →
anubis13–80.0225%8 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0820%6 Oct →
ancient13–20.1027%6 Oct →
dust213–110.0322%30 Sept →
ancient8–130.0310%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0317%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0125%25 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0225%20 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0217%20 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.019%13 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.220%12 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0342%12 Sept →
mirage10–130.0317%12 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0318%10 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0527%10 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0618%3 Sept →
mirage13–60.0126%3 Sept →
inferno13–70.0327%3 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0217%1 Sept →
ancient9–130.008%30 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0510%30 Aug →
anubis13–40.0224%27 Aug →
mirage13–50.0830%27 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0524%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0121%25 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0219%23 Aug →
mirage13–70.0533%23 Aug →
mirage13–60.0725%23 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0216%23 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0216%23 Aug →
cache13–70.1023%23 Aug →
cache10–130.0324%17 Aug →
cache13–30.1114%17 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0031%17 Aug →
ancient13–30.0618%15 Aug →
anubis15–150.0119%15 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0031%15 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0324%13 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0427%7 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0617%7 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0314%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0120%6 Aug →
ancient6–130.0535%6 Aug →
ancient13–90.0225%6 Aug →
mirage12–160.0024%3 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0123%3 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0026%2 Aug →
cache10–130.0230%2 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0127%1 Aug →
mirage13–40.2127%1 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0210%31 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0519%31 Jul →
mirage0–6-0.110%29 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0311%29 Jul →
mirage13–40.0627%27 Jul →
ancient13–80.0213%27 Jul →
mirage13–60.0613%27 Jul →
ancient13–80.0817%27 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0214%26 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0016%26 Jul →
ancient13–10.0333%15 Jul →
mirage13–110.0014%15 Jul →
cache13–50.0539%15 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0138%13 Jul →
mirage12–160.0416%13 Jul →
cache13–100.0221%13 Jul →
dust216–140.1025%13 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.049%13 Jul →
cache13–160.0824%10 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0613%10 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0518%9 Jul →
ancient6–130.0218%9 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0629%9 Jul →
mirage13–60.0613%9 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0023%5 Jul →
anubis13–60.0616%4 Jul →
ancient13–90.0222%3 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0417%3 Jul →
mirage13–160.0520%30 Jun →
mirage11–40.0224%30 Jun →
anubis13–30.0216%30 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0129%29 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.0314%26 Jun →
ancient13–70.0626%26 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0430%23 Jun →
mirage13–60.0328%23 Jun →
inferno13–80.0323%22 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0413%22 Jun →
mirage16–130.0316%21 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.0132%19 Jun →
inferno13–30.0918%18 Jun →
mirage13–60.0123%18 Jun →
nuke11–130.0216%18 Jun →
inferno8–130.0126%5 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0528%5 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0517%5 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0333%2 Jun →
dust213–60.0629%2 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.