benetto

benetto — CS2 Stats

76561198218512219[U:1:258246491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,893Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,157Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87550 of 231884 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,402 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,157 +1,600 29 Mar12 Sept · 35 days played
17,55722,889peak 22,88929 Mar12 Sept
23,139Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,402Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-03-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,402
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,732 below peak (22,889)
  • +1,092 over 30 days · improving
  • -842 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 843 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbenettoFACEITLevel 5 · 1,402 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,157 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,402csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning49
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateWLLTWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility4.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.9
Utility4.3
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact9.8

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time622ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 27 Aug
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 2 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 13 May
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 15 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6cacheWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA42261662%-0.02
ancientC1871139%-0.03
infernoA1610663%-0.02
cacheD112918%-0.03
nukeS64267%-0.02
anubisA53260%-0.00
dust2110100%0.02
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,811Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.2ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27249%0.9514.8
Inferno13448%1.0014.1
Ancient9949%0.8414.8
Nuke4643%0.9514.1
Anubis4042%0.9915.5
Overpass2357%0.9715.2
Dust21155%0.749.8
Vertigo956%0.8913.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
69.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
616msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.02HE damage / grenade
5.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4913 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4299% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–5-0.0422%12 Sept
mirage10–13-0.076%12 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0417%10 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0611%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0313%3 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0323%3 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0415%30 Aug
cache6–13-0.0311%30 Aug
anubis13–40.0619%27 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0217%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0314%25 Aug
anubis13–70.0424%23 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0216%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0422%23 Aug
inferno13–70.0530%23 Aug
cache10–130.056%17 Aug
cache13–3-0.0125%17 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0616%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0119%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0820%6 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0221%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0723%3 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0337%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0419%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0328%1 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0316%1 Aug
mirage13–40.0219%27 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0411%27 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0314%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0213%27 Jul
mirage8–130.0626%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0213%26 Jul
cache9–130.009%15 Jul
mirage13–50.0216%15 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0211%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0313%15 Jul
cache13–5-0.0116%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0117%13 Jul
cache13–16-0.028%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0811%10 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0816%9 Jul
ancient6–13-0.049%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0311%5 Jul
ancient5–13-0.049%5 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0318%3 Jul
inferno13–9-0.039%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0315%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0414%3 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0514%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0326%1 Jul
mirage13–160.0211%30 Jun
mirage11–4-0.035%30 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0310%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0115%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0521%25 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0618%24 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0517%23 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0115%23 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0813%23 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0214%22 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0226%22 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0410%21 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0526%20 Jun
inferno13–30.014%18 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0016%18 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0221%18 Jun
ancient13–50.0418%12 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0023%12 Jun
ancient13–30.0124%10 Jun
inferno8–13-0.047%5 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0217%5 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0319%5 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0112%2 Jun
dust213–60.0219%2 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0230%27 May
mirage13–3-0.0817%27 May
nuke13–7-0.0213%25 May
cache8–13-0.0614%25 May
overpass13–9-0.0213%24 May
cache10–13-0.0621%18 May
cache2–13-0.116%15 May
mirage13–30.0519%13 May
inferno9–130.0218%13 May
mirage13–10-0.0119%13 May
mirage13–100.0424%29 Apr
nuke13–3-0.019%24 Apr
mirage15–150.0114%17 Apr
ancient10–13-0.077%14 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0112%14 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0418%13 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0216%7 Apr
nuke13–40.0415%3 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0126%3 Apr
inferno10–13-0.094%30 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0321%30 Mar
ancient15–15-0.044%30 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0111%30 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0611%29 Mar
inferno10–130.0412%29 Mar
ancient13–3-0.083%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →