Flippy Nips

Flippy Nips — CS2 Stats

AU76561198100221754[U:1:139956026]Steam profile ↗

2,068Tracked matches64%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,209Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate34.7%42.1%42.5%7.7% short
Shot accuracy9.3%12.1%10.9%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.090.990.99above
Match win rate41.8%43.9%44.2%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFlippy NipsFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY503812Last 10050%Win rateWTLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression5.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact9.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time548ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — overpass 13–4
130Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
33In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC167944%0.01
cacheB147750%-0.00
overpassS139469%0.02
ancientD124833%-0.01
vertigoB126650%0.02
nukeA95456%-0.01
infernoS54180%-0.00
italyA53260%0.05
dust241325%0.03
boulder31233%0.02
warden3030%0.05
train21150%0.02
shelter110100%0.01
office110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

70,722Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4,871Matches
41.8%Match win rate
34.7%Headshot %
9.3%Shot accuracy
6,686MVPs
1,270Hours (in match)
3,664Bombs planted
724Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,666
MAC-102,490
AWP2,163
MP91,884
FAMAS1,803

Lifetime map wins

3,859dust2
3,751vertigo
3,098inferno
2,699nuke
1,006train
602office
480cbble
436italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
11.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0816%24 Aug
overpass12–120.0316%24 Aug
dust28–130.0315%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0618%24 Aug
shelter13–80.0119%21 Aug
cache13–80.0113%21 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0521%21 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0913%21 Aug
cache13–70.008%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0514%21 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0111%21 Aug
anubis13–8-0.034%9 Aug
anubis13–90.0614%9 Aug
anubis9–130.0214%9 Aug
ancient11–130.0115%9 Aug
nuke13–5-0.036%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.037%7 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0029%3 Aug
italy13–70.0517%3 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0019%3 Aug
vertigo12–120.0420%3 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0430%1 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0120%1 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0117%28 Jul
cache13–30.1116%28 Jul
vertigo12–120.0113%28 Jul
cache2–13-0.0920%23 Jul
boulder13–50.0525%23 Jul
overpass1–13-0.0431%23 Jul
dust29–130.0222%23 Jul
dust27–130.0313%20 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0112%20 Jul
italy13–70.0015%20 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0315%20 Jul
boulder10–130.0825%20 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0221%20 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0913%18 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0418%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.0317%18 Jul
anubis8–130.0111%18 Jul
ancient13–20.029%18 Jul
boulder2–13-0.0812%18 Jul
vertigo13–80.0815%6 Jul
cache7–13-0.0425%6 Jul
cache12–120.0414%6 Jul
train12–120.0514%6 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0010%6 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0519%6 Jul
warden8–13-0.0124%6 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0111%4 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0219%4 Jul
ancient8–130.0021%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0814%3 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0321%3 Jul
nuke9–130.0321%3 Jul
anubis13–30.0722%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0114%3 Jul
dust213–20.0210%3 Jul
cache13–10-0.0229%3 Jul
overpass13–10.0619%29 Jun
vertigo13–20.0417%29 Jun
cache13–4-0.017%29 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0329%29 Jun
anubis13–40.0612%29 Jun
anubis13–00.0811%27 Jun
vertigo13–110.0715%27 Jun
cache13–80.0112%27 Jun
anubis11–130.0519%27 Jun
overpass13–70.0427%27 Jun
ancient13–20.0323%27 Jun
cache11–5-0.0121%27 Jun
overpass13–3-0.019%26 Jun
nuke13–2-0.0212%26 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0414%26 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0314%26 Jun
nuke13–110.0610%26 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0417%26 Jun
overpass9–13-0.038%26 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0913%26 Jun
italy6–13-0.0323%23 Jun
warden12–120.0922%23 Jun
overpass13–60.0212%23 Jun
overpass13–60.0417%23 Jun
anubis13–100.0222%23 Jun
cache4–13-0.0124%23 Jun
overpass13–40.2115%22 Jun
vertigo11–30.0213%15 Jun
italy13–70.1519%15 Jun
train13–4-0.0118%12 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0218%12 Jun
vertigo13–110.0020%12 Jun
cache12–120.0115%12 Jun
overpass13–90.0618%12 Jun
office13–60.0025%12 Jun
warden10–130.0626%12 Jun
italy11–130.0920%12 Jun
anubis6–130.0014%12 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.0414%12 Jun
cache7–13-0.0219%12 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0012%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →