Lenda

Lenda — CS2 Stats

IS76561198095532264[U:1:135266536]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,898Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,159Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating23,725Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31958 of 231287 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,780 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 29 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,725 +36 13 May9 Sept · 26 days played
22,59527,419peak 27,41913 May9 Sept
27,419Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,780Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-04-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,780
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 221 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,694 below peak (27,419)
  • -38 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,231 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,275 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate35.8%46.8%48.3%12.4% short
Shot accuracy17.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.221.061.07above
Match win rate49.1%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLendaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,780 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,725 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,780csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning41
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62371Last 10062%Win rateLWLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +5.9pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.0
Utility4.3
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.1
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time553ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 31 May
40%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · anubis, 30 May
313msFastest reaction time · 0–2 · anubis, 30 May
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 13 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25151060%-0.00
mirageS1812667%-0.01
infernoB157847%0.00
anubisS107370%-0.00
nukeS107370%-0.00
ancientA74357%0.00
cacheS64267%-0.02
overpass32167%-0.03
vertigo32167%0.02
train21150%0.02
poseidon110100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

221,401Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
10,917Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
35.8%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
26,854MVPs
4,958Hours (in match)
7,223Bombs planted
2,008Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP53,404
AK-4746,063
Knife12,494
MAC-105,738
SSG 085,603
P904,812

Lifetime map wins

16,710dust2
13,144inferno
6,945nuke
6,063vertigo
4,006train
1,559office
1,252cbble
220italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
73%Win rate
1.56Avg K/D
94.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21182%1.8919.8
Inferno875%1.5820.0
Anubis786%1.5817.6
Ancient771%1.3218.9
Nuke6100%1.7715.2
Mirage560%1.5216.8
Overpass1100%1.2515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
543msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
6.38HE damage / grenade
5.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0621%16 Sept
anubis13–100.0012%15 Sept
train5–130.0421%15 Sept
dust213–30.1034%15 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0532%9 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0523%8 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0525%29 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0328%29 Aug
nuke8–60.0233%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0321%22 Aug
anubis13–110.0425%22 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0315%22 Aug
cache10–13-0.0129%13 Aug
dust213–50.0815%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0018%2 Aug
dust213–60.1019%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0023%30 Jul
dust213–60.0211%30 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0221%30 Jul
dust213–70.0915%22 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0531%22 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0621%21 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0220%21 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0226%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0121%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0125%16 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0820%16 Jul
anubis13–10.0129%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.0316%11 Jul
cache13–3-0.0217%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0131%9 Jul
inferno13–80.0229%9 Jul
dust210–13-0.0324%8 Jul
inferno13–10-0.038%6 Jul
dust213–60.0229%6 Jul
overpass16–13-0.0323%1 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0318%1 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0119%1 Jul
inferno13–50.0616%30 Jun
dust24–13-0.1419%30 Jun
cache13–4-0.0133%28 Jun
mirage13–80.0011%28 Jun
mirage13–100.0010%27 Jun
mirage13–9-0.016%27 Jun
dust213–60.0136%27 Jun
cache13–6-0.0719%27 Jun
inferno13–80.0611%27 Jun
nuke13–80.0329%27 Jun
mirage8–130.0415%27 Jun
dust20–13-0.040%25 Jun
anubis7–130.0221%25 Jun
inferno11–130.0515%25 Jun
anubis13–70.0018%23 Jun
ancient13–90.0220%22 Jun
dust213–90.0222%21 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0712%21 Jun
dust213–70.0411%21 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0224%21 Jun
ancient8–130.0327%21 Jun
nuke13–110.0129%21 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0126%21 Jun
inferno13–80.0124%21 Jun
dust213–11-0.0215%21 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0215%20 Jun
dust210–13-0.0527%20 Jun
ancient7–130.0122%20 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0317%20 Jun
mirage13–110.0113%19 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0720%18 Jun
nuke13–110.0114%18 Jun
dust213–110.0324%17 Jun
inferno10–130.0136%17 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0125%16 Jun
dust210–13-0.0319%15 Jun
dust213–7-0.0127%10 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0028%8 Jun
train13–9-0.0015%7 Jun
vertigo13–20.0717%6 Jun
dust24–130.0224%6 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0419%6 Jun
overpass0–13-0.060%3 Jun
mirage13–80.0125%31 May
poseidon9–10.1736%31 May
vertigo9–2-0.028%31 May
nuke9–3-0.0416%31 May
inferno9–40.1423%31 May
dust26–13-0.0325%30 May
dust27–13-0.0720%30 May
mirage13–80.0331%30 May
anubis0–20.0540%30 May
dust29–13-0.0211%29 May
inferno7–13-0.0113%28 May
vertigo12–120.0112%25 May
dust213–100.0216%13 May
nuke8–130.017%13 May
anubis13–10.0619%9 May
anubis13–6-0.086%8 May
cache8–13-0.0713%7 May
dust24–4-0.0813%7 May
cache13–20.0621%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →