Parada Fofa

Parada Fofa — CS2 Stats

IS76561198387040637[U:1:426774909]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,545Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,354Hours in CS34Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,104Top 5% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5191 of 231292 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,052 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−303Premier CS Rating · 27,407 → 27,104
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,104 -598 22 Aug20 Sept · 20 days played
26,05327,702peak 27,70222 Aug20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,052 +0 4 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
1,0521,052peak 1,0524 Sept20 Sept
28,592Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,052Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,052
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 598 below peak (27,702)
  • -598 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,896 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.3%48.3%51.0%2.7% short
Shot accuracy10.6%13.2%13.7%3.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.071.090.22 short
Match win rate50.1%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGParada FofaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,052 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,104 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,052csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning62
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWWWTWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −11.4pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 712 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time507ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 492ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 3 Sept
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–1 · inferno, 13 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 16mirageWeakest map · 47% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%-0.01
dust2B1910953%0.01
infernoB1991047%0.01
cacheS1611569%0.01
nukeB126650%-0.00
ancientB105550%0.01
anubis42250%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,051Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
4,131Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
48.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10.6%Shot accuracy
8,745MVPs
1,795Hours (in match)
3,991Bombs planted
827Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,737
AWP7,471
Knife1,311
SSG 081,271
MP91,161
P250947

Lifetime map wins

5,734inferno
4,918dust2
3,864vertigo
3,838nuke
1,653train
374cbble
307office
142lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

368Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.7ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12852%1.0215.4
Dust28548%1.0414.5
Inferno4353%1.1515.5
Ancient3571%1.3118.3
Anubis3050%1.0015.7
Nuke1275%1.1117.6
Cache1090%1.1515.7
Overpass633%0.789.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
505msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
5.93HE damage / grenade
7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5899% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0314%20 Sept
nuke13–70.0624%19 Sept
ancient1–1-0.080%19 Sept
cache13–60.0324%19 Sept
cache13–90.0023%19 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0711%19 Sept
dust213–70.0016%19 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0621%16 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0212%16 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0225%16 Sept
dust29–130.0521%16 Sept
inferno9–60.0139%16 Sept
mirage13–100.0329%13 Sept
vertigo13–50.0127%13 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0024%13 Sept
inferno2–10.0667%13 Sept
dust211–130.0626%13 Sept
cache4–13-0.0616%13 Sept
cache6–13-0.0316%12 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0417%12 Sept
inferno0–3-0.080%12 Sept
inferno6–130.0826%10 Sept
ancient13–40.0144%10 Sept
nuke16–13-0.0212%10 Sept
cache9–13-0.0521%10 Sept
inferno7–130.0528%10 Sept
inferno13–110.0033%10 Sept
cache13–60.019%10 Sept
ancient13–10.0355%10 Sept
dust213–60.0020%10 Sept
inferno11–13-0.029%9 Sept
mirage13–20.0223%8 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0013%8 Sept
dust215–190.0021%8 Sept
inferno13–100.0231%7 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0616%7 Sept
dust20–13-0.094%7 Sept
ancient6–130.0025%7 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0120%7 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0720%6 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0313%6 Sept
cache9–30.0525%6 Sept
nuke13–40.0421%6 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0022%6 Sept
dust213–90.0424%6 Sept
anubis11–130.0116%6 Sept
mirage2–130.0231%6 Sept
cache13–90.1222%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0015%6 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0218%5 Sept
dust213–100.0315%5 Sept
cache13–70.0222%5 Sept
mirage13–90.0523%5 Sept
mirage13–30.0811%5 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0816%5 Sept
cache7–1-0.0333%5 Sept
ancient11–130.0216%5 Sept
dust213–7-0.0039%5 Sept
mirage14–160.0127%5 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0219%4 Sept
inferno5–130.0119%4 Sept
dust25–13-0.0822%3 Sept
nuke13–30.0135%3 Sept
dust216–140.0523%3 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0023%3 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0121%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0719%3 Sept
dust213–90.0329%3 Sept
cache13–30.1828%3 Sept
cache3–30.0338%31 Aug
nuke7–1-0.0338%31 Aug
dust23–13-0.0320%30 Aug
ancient13–20.0332%30 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0118%30 Aug
inferno11–130.0118%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0018%29 Aug
dust210–130.0122%29 Aug
nuke8–130.0328%29 Aug
inferno5–130.0315%29 Aug
nuke13–80.0927%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0620%26 Aug
cache13–6-0.0413%26 Aug
dust213–60.0227%25 Aug
inferno13–100.1022%25 Aug
dust27–130.0135%24 Aug
inferno8–13-0.1016%24 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0724%24 Aug
cache13–8-0.0111%24 Aug
dust216–120.1116%23 Aug
ancient13–20.0922%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0318%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.058%22 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0215%22 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0216%22 Aug
mirage3–130.0232%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0012%22 Aug
cache7–13-0.0532%22 Aug
inferno16–130.0616%22 Aug
dust213–50.0120%22 Aug
cache13–60.0110%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →