Leukos

Leukos — CS2 Stats

76561198091130970[U:1:130865242]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

635Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,234Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,303 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,303 → 1,303
+2Tracked matches · now 635
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 16 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,586 +165 16 Sept10 Apr · 30 days played
21,47125,491peak 25,49116 Sept10 Apr
25,581Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,303Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2025-09-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,303
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 48 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate34.7%46.8%48.3%13.5% short
Shot accuracy19.0%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.061.070.12 short
Match win rate42.4%46.3%46.9%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeukosFACEITLevel 8 · 1,303 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,303csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning34
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 49 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning3.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time551ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 27 Mar
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 5 Apr
398msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · dust2, 4 Apr
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 4 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 73% over 15anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA24141058%-0.02
dust2C23101343%-0.02
mirageB178947%0.00
overpassS1511473%-0.02
ancientC114736%-0.01
anubisD62433%-0.04
nuke21150%-0.06
cache1010%-0.05
train110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,232Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
6,983Matches
42.4%Match win rate
34.7%Headshot %
19.0%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
17,099MVPs
2,898Hours (in match)
5,777Bombs planted
1,040Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,720
AWP13,119
Knife4,057
P903,364
FAMAS2,286
MAC-101,959
P2501,938

Lifetime map wins

13,903inferno
11,478dust2
2,006nuke
1,869cbble
1,252train
1,084vertigo
184lake
133aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

233Matches
55%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22348%0.8512.7
Mirage2148%1.0815.4
Inferno1883%1.1716.2
Anubis1471%1.1313.9
Cache967%1.0218.0
Overpass729%0.9416.1
Vertigo560%1.1217.8
Nuke475%1.2019.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
546msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
12.7%Flash assists
12.43HE damage / grenade
2.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.3842 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2455% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0518%17 May
overpass13–9-0.0516%16 May
inferno13–110.0216%10 May
anubis15–19-0.0513%8 May
dust216–14-0.0212%2 May
anubis10–13-0.0432%2 May
anubis11–13-0.0231%26 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0410%17 Apr
inferno13–7-0.039%10 Apr
inferno13–100.0137%5 Apr
inferno11–13-0.044%5 Apr
overpass13–20.0729%4 Apr
dust213–10-0.0611%4 Apr
overpass13–0-0.0410%4 Apr
dust215–15-0.0215%3 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0013%3 Apr
dust216–13-0.018%3 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0713%3 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0221%2 Apr
ancient13–90.0018%31 Mar
inferno14–16-0.0416%31 Mar
mirage13–20.1123%27 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0217%20 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0524%13 Feb
mirage13–40.0819%13 Feb
dust213–80.0114%6 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0220%6 Feb
dust213–8-0.006%6 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0818%1 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0318%1 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0913%30 Jan
mirage16–140.0317%30 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0413%30 Jan
dust213–00.1019%30 Jan
dust28–13-0.0315%25 Jan
dust213–3-0.0415%10 Jan
dust213–10-0.0219%10 Jan
train13–5-0.0224%9 Jan
dust213–80.0117%9 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0317%6 Jan
dust20–13-0.0826%2 Jan
inferno19–160.0013%1 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0413%27 Dec
mirage15–15-0.0314%26 Dec
overpass13–6-0.0622%26 Dec
mirage7–13-0.057%25 Dec
ancient7–13-0.050%9 Dec
dust29–13-0.057%9 Dec
dust28–13-0.0421%7 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0513%7 Dec
inferno13–50.0115%6 Dec
mirage13–50.0123%6 Dec
ancient3–13-0.0114%16 Nov
dust25–13-0.0816%16 Nov
inferno13–5-0.0015%16 Nov
ancient9–13-0.0411%13 Nov
dust211–13-0.0916%13 Nov
inferno12–16-0.0213%11 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0116%10 Nov
dust212–160.0218%10 Nov
ancient13–10-0.0323%10 Nov
nuke4–13-0.089%3 Nov
dust25–13-0.0317%3 Nov
ancient11–130.0111%26 Oct
inferno13–8-0.0110%26 Oct
overpass13–60.0320%26 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0911%26 Oct
inferno13–90.0420%26 Oct
mirage6–130.0227%26 Oct
mirage1–13-0.0929%24 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0321%24 Oct
overpass13–6-0.0313%18 Oct
ancient16–140.0219%17 Oct
inferno11–130.0121%5 Oct
dust211–13-0.0222%5 Oct
inferno6–13-0.0310%5 Oct
ancient8–13-0.070%5 Oct
overpass9–13-0.0624%3 Oct
inferno9–130.0114%28 Sept
nuke8–6-0.0329%28 Sept
dust28–13-0.0215%28 Sept
ancient10–13-0.075%28 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0417%27 Sept
overpass13–8-0.0116%27 Sept
inferno13–60.0020%26 Sept
ancient13–80.1013%21 Sept
dust29–13-0.0317%21 Sept
overpass13–90.0516%21 Sept
overpass11–130.0219%20 Sept
dust213–4-0.0520%20 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0811%20 Sept
inferno13–40.0016%18 Sept
mirage13–50.1117%18 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0813%17 Sept
overpass13–70.0115%17 Sept
dust29–13-0.0117%17 Sept
ancient11–130.0316%16 Sept
overpass13–70.0312%16 Sept
mirage13–40.0915%16 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0120%16 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →