HeksA

HeksA — CS2 Stats

CA76561198085485323[U:1:125219595]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,012Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,736Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,128 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,128 → 1,128
+11Tracked matches · now 1,012
−1.4ppWin rate · 38.5% → 37.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 28 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,128 +0 6 Sept19 Sept · 3 observations
1,1281,128peak 1,1286 Sept19 Sept
1,128Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-05-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,128
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches150
Win rate53%
K/D1.21
Headshot %43%

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.4%43.8%44.8%1.4% short
Shot accuracy13.7%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.971.021.040.07 short
Match win rate42.0%44.7%45.2%3.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeksAFACEITLevel 5 · 1,128 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,128csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning57
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37585Last 10037%Win rateLWLLWWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility7.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch6.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.7
Utility7.0
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact0.7

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time532ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 27 Jun
42%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 4 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 17 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 8mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC36162044%-0.00
infernoD1651131%-0.01
mirageD92722%-0.01
nukeC94544%-0.00
anubisD92722%-0.00
ancientB84450%-0.02
vertigoC52340%-0.03
office4040%-0.03
dust232167%-0.04
warden1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

147,894Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
7,345Matches
42.0%Match win rate
43.4%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
11,631MVPs
2,787Hours (in match)
7,128Bombs planted
1,075Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4751,226
AWP26,872
P2502,897
MP91,995
MAC-101,901
Tec-91,842

Lifetime map wins

10,776inferno
5,535dust2
2,374train
1,910nuke
1,155cbble
1,086office
580vertigo
161italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

370Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7149%0.8914.2
Inferno4862%1.0215.7
Overpass2236%0.7913.4
Ancient1958%0.9014.3
Anubis1436%0.8513.9
Nuke650%0.9814.8
Train667%1.2318.2
Cache475%1.3418.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
529msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
62.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
10.76HE damage / grenade
12.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1782% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.0418%20 Sept
cache13–20.0220%20 Sept
ancient8–130.0317%20 Sept
mirage11–130.0815%20 Sept
mirage13–100.0320%14 Sept
cache13–11-0.0219%5 Sept
inferno12–120.0226%5 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0342%4 Sept
cache7–13-0.0330%4 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0218%4 Sept
anubis8–130.0326%2 Sept
inferno1–13-0.126%2 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0312%2 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0315%1 Sept
cache13–8-0.0035%1 Sept
cache7–13-0.0423%1 Sept
nuke12–120.0524%18 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0316%18 Aug
cache6–130.0623%18 Aug
cache8–13-0.0026%17 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0119%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0321%17 Aug
inferno3–130.1020%17 Aug
office8–13-0.0421%17 Aug
cache4–13-0.0226%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0533%16 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0932%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0214%16 Aug
inferno13–40.0117%13 Aug
anubis13–00.1132%13 Aug
cache8–13-0.1119%13 Aug
office12–12-0.0715%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0614%10 Aug
cache13–70.059%10 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0420%9 Aug
nuke8–10.0532%9 Aug
mirage9–130.0121%9 Aug
dust213–5-0.0113%9 Aug
anubis11–130.0321%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0621%8 Aug
cache13–2-0.0517%8 Aug
cache13–60.0626%3 Aug
cache13–40.0820%3 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0124%26 Jul
cache8–13-0.0518%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.058%26 Jul
mirage5–130.0318%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.068%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0819%25 Jul
nuke13–60.1031%25 Jul
inferno19–22-0.0214%25 Jul
cache13–10.0242%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0719%20 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0024%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0526%12 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0722%12 Jul
cache13–100.0135%11 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0323%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0518%11 Jul
cache10–130.0119%11 Jul
cache10–130.0525%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.1110%11 Jul
ancient13–70.0121%11 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0522%11 Jul
cache11–13-0.0617%5 Jul
inferno13–70.0529%5 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0810%5 Jul
cache9–40.0224%5 Jul
cache5–30.000%5 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0516%1 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0716%1 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0717%27 Jun
dust213–9-0.0418%27 Jun
warden7–13-0.0611%27 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0811%27 Jun
cache13–80.1325%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0431%21 Jun
inferno13–110.0512%21 Jun
cache13–50.0117%21 Jun
cache2–130.0130%20 Jun
cache10–130.0023%15 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0526%15 Jun
anubis9–130.0214%8 Jun
mirage13–6-0.078%8 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0318%8 Jun
cache11–13-0.0716%8 Jun
cache11–13-0.0419%8 Jun
anubis9–130.0629%7 Jun
ancient5–130.0123%7 Jun
cache5–13-0.0528%7 Jun
ancient13–70.0037%6 Jun
cache10–13-0.0423%6 Jun
cache11–130.0212%5 Jun
cache13–70.0824%5 Jun
cache11–13-0.0032%5 Jun
cache13–10-0.0524%1 Jun
office8–13-0.0424%1 Jun
nuke12–120.0026%30 May
cache13–70.0124%30 May
office6–130.0323%28 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →