๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿท๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿท๐Ÿ—ฟ

๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿท๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿท๐Ÿ—ฟ โ€” CS2 Stats

76561198074265978[U:1:114000250]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

355Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,056Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating21,698Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band ยท top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60328 of 259880 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 May 2026 (161 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,698 +7,728 25 Apr โ€“ 27 May ยท 27 days played
13,39123,034peak 23,03425 Apr27 May
23,172Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-04-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,336 below peak (23,034)
  • +7,982 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 โ€” 3,302 to go
  • Reached: Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate48.0%46.9%49.3%1.3% short
Shot accuracy17.8%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.251.081.12above
Match win rate37.6%46.7%48.5%10.9% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿท๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿท๐Ÿ—ฟPREMIER21,698 ยท Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning44
Utility43

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD58โ€“39โ€“3Last 10058%Win rateLWLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.01 avg rating ยท +4.3pp headshot accuracy ยท +21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“4 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“7 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 8โ€“12 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder โ€” No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.7
Utility4.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.3

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02โˆ’0.02
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.02
Reaction time622msโˆ’12ms
first โ…“ avg 635ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+0.6%
first โ…“ avg 19.3% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating ยท 13โ€“2 ยท inferno, 2 May โ†’
50%Best headshot accuracy ยท 2โ€“0 ยท inferno, 7 May โ†’
461msFastest reaction time ยท 7โ€“13 ยท inferno, 11 May โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท mirage, 7 May โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
15โ€“4In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 73% over 11anubisWeakest map ยท 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2515โ€“1060%-0.01
mirageB168โ€“850%-0.00
nukeB137โ€“654%-0.01
overpassS128โ€“467%-0.01
dust2S118โ€“373%-0.00
ancientA106โ€“460%-0.03
anubisC94โ€“544%-0.02
cacheโ€”32โ€“167%-0.01
officeโ€”10โ€“10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

118,126Lifetime kills
1.25K/D ยท Top 25% of Pink band
5,055Matches
37.6%Match win rate
48.0%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Pink band
17.8%Shot accuracy ยท Top 25% of Pink band
11,802MVPs
2,056Hours (in match)
2,772Bombs planted
863Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,650inferno
6,610dust2
1,396nuke
1,241office
1,064train
285assault
265vertigo
253cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
53%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
โ€”ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

โ€”1v1 clutch win
โ€”1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
9.8ยฐPreaim
614msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.90HE damage / grenade
2.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9208 โ€” below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1295% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy โ†’Anubis grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5โ€“9-0.1124%28 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“30.0626%27 May โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0518%27 May โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0432%27 May โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0116%24 May โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0211%24 May โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0912%23 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0532%23 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0217%23 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“16-0.0325%21 May โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.0215%19 May โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0520%17 May โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0513%17 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0320%17 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.0822%16 May โ†’
nuke16โ€“140.0423%16 May โ†’
overpass6โ€“13-0.0224%16 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0012%16 May โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0211%16 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“7-0.0711%16 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0511%16 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0322%16 May โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0515%15 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“3-0.0017%14 May โ†’
office9โ€“13-0.0721%13 May โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0319%13 May โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0733%13 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0117%12 May โ†’
dust25โ€“130.0140%12 May โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0717%11 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0316%10 May โ†’
anubis16โ€“140.0118%10 May โ†’
inferno9โ€“60.0225%10 May โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0119%10 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0113%10 May โ†’
overpass9โ€“13-0.064%10 May โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0127%8 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.029%8 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0111%8 May โ†’
ancient16โ€“14-0.0211%8 May โ†’
overpass12โ€“40.0524%8 May โ†’
overpass13โ€“11-0.0119%7 May โ†’
overpass13โ€“60.0221%7 May โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0719%7 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.0621%7 May โ†’
inferno2โ€“00.0050%7 May โ†’
inferno2โ€“13-0.077%7 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0416%7 May โ†’
nuke16โ€“140.0115%7 May โ†’
ancient7โ€“130.0235%7 May โ†’
overpass10โ€“13-0.039%7 May โ†’
anubis16โ€“14-0.028%6 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0421%6 May โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0113%6 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0124%5 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“8-0.0117%5 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0221%5 May โ†’
mirage12โ€“16-0.0720%5 May โ†’
overpass13โ€“90.0225%5 May โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0220%5 May โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.089%5 May โ†’
overpass13โ€“4-0.0510%5 May โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0122%4 May โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0012%3 May โ†’
overpass16โ€“120.0118%2 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0325%2 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“20.1726%2 May โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0213%2 May โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0927%2 May โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0522%1 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.017%1 May โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0320%1 May โ†’
overpass13โ€“90.0320%30 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.068%30 Apr โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0514%30 Apr โ†’
anubis3โ€“10-0.0015%30 Apr โ†’
cache13โ€“11-0.0316%30 Apr โ†’
cache12โ€“120.0527%30 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0724%29 Apr โ†’
cache13โ€“4-0.0514%29 Apr โ†’
overpass13โ€“50.0522%28 Apr โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0812%28 Apr โ†’
inferno16โ€“140.0523%28 Apr โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.0522%28 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0440%28 Apr โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.009%28 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0319%28 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0619%28 Apr โ†’
overpass7โ€“13-0.0819%27 Apr โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0225%27 Apr โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0319%27 Apr โ†’
inferno4โ€“130.0126%27 Apr โ†’
mirage16โ€“130.0521%27 Apr โ†’
inferno2โ€“13-0.0422%26 Apr โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.087%26 Apr โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0827%26 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0629%26 Apr โ†’
nuke15โ€“150.0823%26 Apr โ†’
ancient16โ€“14-0.0818%25 Apr โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0211%25 Apr โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.