SikaNiska

SikaNiska — CS2 Stats

FI76561198127262489[U:1:166996761]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,496Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,211Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,086Top 5% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6049 of 259859 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,381 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,086 -1,373 27 Aug – 3 Nov · 11 days played
26,22528,459peak 28,45927 Aug3 Nov
28,459Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,381Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,381
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 150 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,373 below peak (28,459)
  • +520 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,914 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate46.2%50.9%
Shot accuracy12.4%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.021.09
Match win rate40.4%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSikaNiskaFACEITLevel 10 · 1,381 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,086 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,381csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning58
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–58–4Last 10038%Win rateLWLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time543ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 20 Oct →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 13 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 12–16 · inferno, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · train, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 14mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC259–1636%0.03
officeD175–1229%0.04
infernoB147–750%0.02
ancientC94–544%0.00
anubisC83–538%0.02
mirageD71–614%-0.02
dust2B63–350%-0.00
overpass—41–325%0.05
nuke—31–233%-0.00
train—32–167%0.04
vertigo—21–150%0.01
boulder—10–10%0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

136,973Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
7,160Matches
40.4%Match win rate
46.2%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
14,439MVPs
2,954Hours (in match)
4,858Bombs planted
1,783Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

16,195inferno
5,159dust2
4,047nuke
2,739train
2,545office
1,038vertigo
491cbble
154assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

325Matches
55%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
84.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8663%1.3117.3
Anubis4468%1.6217.7
Inferno3949%1.2418.1
Ancient3738%1.1116.5
Dust23132%1.1515.3
Nuke2259%1.3817.4
Overpass1258%1.0616.2
Cache1070%1.7616.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
534msReaction time
57.8%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
11.05HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.6673% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0121%3 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0220%3 Nov →
office7–130.1427%31 Oct →
office3–130.0830%31 Oct →
office2–80.1040%31 Oct →
office2–20.1533%31 Oct →
office2–60.0216%31 Oct →
ancient20–220.0020%31 Oct →
inferno16–140.0624%30 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0029%30 Oct →
cache11–130.0425%28 Oct →
inferno13–20.0516%24 Oct →
inferno13–70.0210%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0120%22 Oct →
cache12–50.0729%22 Oct →
cache13–70.0231%21 Oct →
cache13–70.0222%21 Oct →
cache13–20.2125%20 Oct →
inferno2–130.0620%19 Oct →
office13–80.1228%19 Oct →
office13–100.0324%19 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0125%19 Oct →
boulder9–130.0142%17 Oct →
nuke13–40.0631%16 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0417%16 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0319%16 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0323%14 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0019%13 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0218%13 Oct →
train13–100.0522%12 Oct →
anubis13–60.0216%10 Oct →
overpass13–2-0.0143%10 Oct →
ancient4–130.0723%10 Oct →
office13–5-0.0216%10 Oct →
inferno11–130.0217%10 Oct →
mirage13–100.0320%9 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0510%9 Oct →
cache11–130.0124%8 Oct →
cache8–130.0020%7 Oct →
inferno5–80.0913%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0414%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0313%5 Oct →
ancient13–50.0316%4 Oct →
cache12–120.0320%3 Oct →
office8–13-0.067%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.0113%30 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.034%30 Sept →
cache13–110.036%30 Sept →
cache13–90.0325%28 Sept →
inferno6–2-0.0243%28 Sept →
cache11–130.0118%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0318%27 Sept →
office11–130.0526%27 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0716%24 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0511%23 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0419%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0013%22 Sept →
anubis13–80.0723%22 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0328%22 Sept →
train13–10.0313%19 Sept →
cache6–130.0016%19 Sept →
ancient13–110.0423%18 Sept →
office4–13-0.068%18 Sept →
office5–13-0.0019%18 Sept →
inferno8–130.0031%18 Sept →
cache8–130.0317%17 Sept →
cache2–4-0.0223%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0714%17 Sept →
cache3–130.0437%16 Sept →
cache6–13-0.035%16 Sept →
overpass9–130.1537%13 Sept →
dust211–00.0130%13 Sept →
cache13–70.0647%13 Sept →
inferno13–110.0627%12 Sept →
office8–80.1729%11 Sept →
anubis7–130.0620%11 Sept →
inferno8–130.0318%11 Sept →
train9–130.0333%11 Sept →
mirage6–130.0119%9 Sept →
cache2–130.0425%8 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0531%8 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0011%5 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0215%5 Sept →
office13–110.0212%2 Sept →
office9–13-0.0028%2 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0226%2 Sept →
cache4–100.0417%28 Aug →
cache9–130.0218%27 Aug →
anubis7–130.0021%27 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0124%26 Aug →
overpass7–130.0727%26 Aug →
office10–13-0.0421%25 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0525%25 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0225%24 Aug →
anubis13–70.0819%23 Aug →
cache6–130.0615%23 Aug →
office12–120.0827%23 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0124%22 Aug →
fachwerk13–6-0.0127%22 Aug →
overpass12–12-0.0134%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.