blahr

blahr — CS2 Stats

US76561198066336644[U:1:106070916]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,230Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,012Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating15,176Purple band · top ~27.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,176 -744 30 Aug – 9 Oct · 15 days played
13,55816,377peak 16,37730 Aug9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,091 +0 30 Aug – 6 Sept · 2 observations
1,0911,091peak 1,09130 Aug6 Sept
16,524Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,091Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
15Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,201 below peak (16,377)
  • +15 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,824 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate49.0%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy6.9%12.0%12.4%5.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.021.03above
Match win rate47.5%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGblahrFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,176 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,091csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning61
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.7
Utility5.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch5.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.1
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 28 Sept →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 27 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2813–1546%0.02
dust2A2212–1055%-0.01
mirageD155–1033%0.01
infernoS139–469%0.00
cacheB126–650%-0.01
ancientC52–340%-0.02
anubis—32–167%0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,045Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,555Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
49.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
6.9%Shot accuracy
8,694MVPs
1,481Hours (in match)
4,111Bombs planted
946Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,677dust2
5,545nuke
3,784inferno
1,033train
998vertigo
412cbble
261office
36italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

226Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4250%1.0514.8
Anubis3142%1.0215.1
Nuke3040%0.9615.6
Dust22669%1.1215.8
Ancient2060%1.2316.7
Inferno1735%0.8712.8
Vertigo1275%0.9914.3
Train650%1.3116.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
585msReaction time
54.8%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
9.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0315%9 Oct →
dust25–13-0.068%9 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0324%9 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0619%9 Oct →
mirage13–50.0429%9 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0616%9 Oct →
nuke6–130.0219%9 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0115%8 Oct →
ancient10–130.0219%7 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0411%7 Oct →
inferno13–20.0317%7 Oct →
cache12–160.0413%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0511%7 Oct →
cache13–50.0118%7 Oct →
anubis13–110.0215%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0614%7 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0115%7 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0113%6 Oct →
dust213–60.0219%6 Oct →
cache7–130.0013%6 Oct →
dust213–110.0325%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.1326%6 Oct →
inferno16–140.0620%6 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0418%6 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0322%6 Oct →
dust26–130.0110%6 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0012%6 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0717%4 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0324%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0710%3 Oct →
dust213–40.0024%2 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0716%2 Oct →
nuke11–130.0617%2 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0620%2 Oct →
mirage11–130.0016%2 Oct →
inferno13–40.0518%2 Oct →
dust213–20.0520%2 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0411%2 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0519%2 Oct →
nuke13–50.1121%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0122%2 Oct →
dust26–130.0124%2 Oct →
cache13–40.0711%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0818%1 Oct →
mirage13–10.0114%1 Oct →
mirage7–130.009%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0120%1 Oct →
inferno13–90.049%1 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0119%1 Oct →
cache13–30.0124%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0116%1 Oct →
nuke13–70.0821%1 Oct →
mirage13–160.0425%30 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0217%30 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0513%30 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0618%28 Sept →
vertigo9–40.2218%28 Sept →
inferno6–130.0112%28 Sept →
dust213–110.0418%28 Sept →
cache16–130.0024%28 Sept →
nuke13–90.0710%28 Sept →
nuke15–150.0718%28 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0019%28 Sept →
nuke13–00.0619%28 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0115%27 Sept →
mirage8–130.0618%27 Sept →
dust211–130.0316%27 Sept →
nuke15–150.0721%27 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0029%27 Sept →
nuke13–100.0320%27 Sept →
nuke13–100.0321%27 Sept →
nuke12–120.0313%27 Sept →
nuke13–50.0726%27 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.1020%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0512%27 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0215%27 Sept →
mirage16–140.0311%27 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0413%27 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0319%27 Sept →
inferno6–30.0515%27 Sept →
nuke13–80.0113%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.019%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.1119%26 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0313%26 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0825%26 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0921%25 Sept →
nuke12–120.0212%25 Sept →
nuke12–50.0725%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0723%25 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0913%24 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0011%24 Sept →
cache13–8-0.079%23 Sept →
cache15–150.0322%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0910%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0318%23 Sept →
inferno13–100.0114%23 Sept →
anubis13–30.0419%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%23 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0120%23 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0118%23 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.