BaBlo

BaBlo — CS2 Stats

SO76561198061614854[U:1:101349126]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,151Tracked matches58%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,353Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,151 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 23 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

27Days played since 2026-01-23

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,274), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate37.1%43.8%44.8%7.7% short
Shot accuracy13.7%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.021.040.13 short
Match win rate45.3%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBaBloFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning25
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46459Last 10046%Win rateLTWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.7pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 759ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 769ms

Last 20

  • 983 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 736ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility1.1
Positioning2.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning2.5
Utility1.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.6

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time717ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 747ms → last ⅓ avg 717ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.04Best match rating · 7–2 · dust2, 26 Feb
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 26 Jun
516msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 17 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 48% over 88mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B88424648%-0.05
mirageD72529%-0.04
overpass21150%-0.07
ancient1010%-0.03
nuke1010%-0.08
anubis110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,905Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,842Matches
45.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
37.1%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9,783MVPs
1,353Hours (in match)
2,244Bombs planted
769Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,083
AWP8,778
P902,810
MP92,351
XM10142,272
SCAR-201,948

Lifetime map wins

18,370dust2
3,072inferno
839nuke
412cbble
337vertigo
209train
107assault
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

262Matches
53%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
61.7ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2875%0.6012.4
Inferno580%0.6510.6
Anubis560%1.1113.8
Mirage560%0.547.8
Nuke560%0.8613.8
Train1100%0.547.0
Ancient10%0.358.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
711msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
29.4%CT opening success
0.18Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
4.75HE damage / grenade
2.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.8155ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1791 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9937% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0817%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0617%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0716%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.077%23 Jul
mirage7–00.0323%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.0910%21 Jul
dust213–7-0.088%21 Jul
dust21–13-0.1310%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0425%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0610%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0850%26 Jun
dust213–11-0.0830%26 Jun
dust27–13-0.0311%26 Jun
dust212–12-0.0514%22 Jun
dust213–9-0.0416%22 Jun
dust213–11-0.057%18 Jun
overpass7–13-0.157%18 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0323%18 Jun
dust21–13-0.1131%18 Jun
dust212–12-0.0012%17 Jun
dust213–9-0.0512%17 Jun
dust213–4-0.046%30 May
dust212–12-0.076%30 May
dust213–4-0.0220%30 May
dust23–13-0.0614%29 Apr
dust213–8-0.0117%29 Apr
dust213–1-0.0213%28 Apr
dust29–13-0.0810%28 Apr
dust213–10-0.0718%28 Apr
dust24–13-0.078%24 Apr
dust27–13-0.087%24 Apr
dust213–9-0.1315%24 Apr
dust211–13-0.0220%24 Apr
dust29–13-0.054%24 Apr
dust213–5-0.0321%24 Apr
dust211–5-0.0616%24 Apr
dust213–8-0.028%20 Apr
dust213–4-0.0715%20 Apr
dust213–8-0.0419%20 Apr
dust211–13-0.0426%17 Apr
dust28–13-0.0418%17 Apr
dust212–12-0.0616%16 Apr
dust28–13-0.1110%16 Apr
dust211–13-0.0220%16 Apr
dust29–13-0.0516%5 Apr
dust213–6-0.0411%5 Apr
dust26–13-0.0512%5 Apr
dust211–13-0.0214%19 Mar
dust213–6-0.0412%19 Mar
dust27–13-0.0915%19 Mar
dust29–13-0.0416%10 Mar
dust24–13-0.1019%10 Mar
dust20–13-0.1414%10 Mar
dust213–10-0.0616%6 Mar
dust213–10-0.0314%6 Mar
dust27–13-0.0711%6 Mar
dust213–4-0.0613%6 Mar
dust213–30.0116%3 Mar
overpass13–40.0213%3 Mar
dust29–13-0.0121%3 Mar
dust213–80.009%27 Feb
dust213–60.0113%26 Feb
dust213–8-0.048%26 Feb
dust25–13-0.119%26 Feb
dust210–13-0.058%26 Feb
dust213–3-0.0638%26 Feb
dust213–10-0.0317%26 Feb
dust27–20.0429%26 Feb
dust213–10-0.0311%26 Feb
dust213–10-0.0321%20 Feb
dust212–12-0.089%20 Feb
dust213–6-0.0317%20 Feb
dust21–13-0.0321%20 Feb
dust22–13-0.1015%20 Feb
dust25–13-0.0512%16 Feb
dust213–6-0.057%16 Feb
dust210–130.0323%16 Feb
dust212–12-0.077%16 Feb
dust28–130.0118%16 Feb
dust213–7-0.074%16 Feb
dust213–3-0.054%16 Feb
dust213–6-0.120%14 Feb
dust210–13-0.0712%14 Feb
dust26–13-0.0425%13 Feb
dust213–100.0118%13 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0816%6 Feb
dust215–15-0.087%6 Feb
dust213–7-0.068%6 Feb
mirage7–13-0.1112%6 Feb
mirage1–100.0123%6 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0614%6 Feb
dust213–7-0.078%6 Feb
dust212–12-0.047%6 Feb
dust29–13-0.0120%6 Feb
mirage5–13-0.1017%6 Feb
anubis13–100.0412%6 Feb
dust26–13-0.068%23 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0016%23 Jan
dust210–13-0.0315%23 Jan
dust29–13-0.0413%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →