HarmlessBot

HarmlessBot — CS2 Stats

HM76561198959833005[U:1:999567277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,376Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,563Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,119Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17884 of 226860 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,119 → 25,119
+5Tracked matches · now 1,376
+6.4ppWin rate · 66.7% → 73.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 17 days played since 8 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,119 +0 23 Jul4 Sept · 3 days played
25,11925,119peak 25,11923 Jul4 Sept
25,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
17Days played since 2026-07-08

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,119
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,881 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.6%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy8.6%13.0%13.2%4.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.531.061.07above
Match win rate49.5%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHarmlessBotFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,119 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning63
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT563410Last 10056%Win rateWWWTWWWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 712 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 20

  • 1154 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.0
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time510ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 4 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 23 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 20 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 23 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 12dust2Weakest map · 56% over 77
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A77433456%0.05
mirageA127558%0.05
cache41325%0.04
nuke220100%0.11
anubis220100%0.01
inferno2020%0.06
ancient110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 77). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,551Lifetime kills
1.53K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
2,770Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8.6%Shot accuracy
8,695MVPs
950Hours (in match)
1,569Bombs planted
721Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

16,199dust2
1,208inferno
554nuke
429vertigo
343cbble
279train
209office
108lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
64%Win rate
1.54Avg K/D
107.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2667%1.4624.2
Mirage475%1.6223.5
Nuke475%1.7521.5
Anubis250%2.2222.0
Inferno2100%1.4924.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
490msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
61.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
11.77Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.0523%9 Sept
dust213–70.0532%9 Sept
dust213–50.1033%4 Sept
dust212–120.0232%4 Sept
dust213–80.0524%4 Sept
nuke9–00.2217%4 Sept
dust213–40.1024%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0216%4 Sept
dust212–120.0730%4 Sept
dust213–80.0433%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0636%20 Aug
dust212–120.0213%20 Aug
dust213–90.0615%20 Aug
dust20–10-0.0121%14 Aug
dust213–110.0927%14 Aug
dust213–80.1323%7 Aug
dust212–120.1614%7 Aug
dust22–50.0614%7 Aug
dust23–130.0620%7 Aug
dust213–40.0713%7 Aug
dust213–90.0729%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.019%2 Aug
dust213–30.0313%2 Aug
dust213–9-0.0022%2 Aug
dust213–40.1533%2 Aug
dust213–90.0722%29 Jul
dust29–130.0817%29 Jul
dust213–10.0831%26 Jul
dust24–130.0519%26 Jul
dust213–40.1734%26 Jul
dust213–60.1733%26 Jul
dust22–7-0.0729%26 Jul
dust213–100.1817%26 Jul
dust212–120.0514%25 Jul
dust213–40.0222%23 Jul
anubis13–00.0517%23 Jul
anubis4–2-0.0310%23 Jul
dust26–130.0223%23 Jul
dust213–50.1138%23 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0128%23 Jul
dust213–60.0926%23 Jul
inferno5–130.0631%23 Jul
dust213–10.000%23 Jul
dust21–13-0.0450%23 Jul
ancient13–30.0333%23 Jul
dust213–100.0014%23 Jul
mirage7–00.1315%23 Jul
dust28–130.0332%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.0423%23 Jul
dust210–130.0723%23 Jul
mirage4–130.0518%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0320%23 Jul
dust213–90.0523%23 Jul
cache0–7-0.0325%23 Jul
mirage13–50.1620%23 Jul
inferno7–130.0634%23 Jul
dust21–13-0.0816%23 Jul
nuke16–130.0129%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0229%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0031%22 Jul
dust213–20.0940%22 Jul
cache1–9-0.0240%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0122%22 Jul
mirage13–30.0916%22 Jul
mirage13–10.0819%22 Jul
dust25–130.0321%22 Jul
dust215–150.1036%22 Jul
cache6–130.0616%22 Jul
dust213–10.0821%22 Jul
dust26–130.0225%22 Jul
dust213–80.0920%21 Jul
dust213–70.0724%21 Jul
dust21–13-0.0227%21 Jul
dust213–110.1228%21 Jul
dust212–120.0529%19 Jul
dust213–110.0317%19 Jul
dust213–50.1119%19 Jul
dust210–130.1236%18 Jul
dust213–70.1123%18 Jul
dust213–50.0926%18 Jul
dust213–70.1424%18 Jul
dust213–50.1017%18 Jul
cache13–50.1623%18 Jul
dust28–130.0333%18 Jul
dust213–4-0.0126%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.0329%18 Jul
dust213–30.0721%18 Jul
dust28–130.0323%18 Jul
dust210–130.1919%18 Jul
dust211–130.0526%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0012%17 Jul
dust212–120.0526%17 Jul
mirage13–50.0021%17 Jul
dust213–110.0821%17 Jul
dust213–30.0444%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0715%14 Jul
dust212–12-0.0319%14 Jul
dust27–130.0532%8 Jul
dust213–90.0424%8 Jul
dust213–80.0821%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →