Kyew -iwl-

Kyew -iwl- — CS2 Stats

KP76561198055199090[U:1:94933362]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,229Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,173Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,578Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7945 of 222038 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,229 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 15 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,578 +2,254 11 Apr16 Sept · 20 days played
24,03526,866peak 26,86611 Apr16 Sept
26,993Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-03-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 288 below peak (26,866)
  • +1,918 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,422 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate61.7%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy23.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.411.051.06above
Match win rate43.9%45.7%46.3%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKyew -iwl-FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER26,578 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning51
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.1
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time626ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 11 Apr
32%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 24 May
422msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 26 Apr
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%-0.02
ancientB168850%-0.03
cacheS1510567%0.01
infernoB147750%-0.01
nukeC114736%-0.01
dust2D71614%-0.02
anubisC52340%-0.01
overpassS54180%0.00
office42250%-0.01
train21150%0.02
debris1010%0.03
alpine110100%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

255,373Lifetime kills
1.41K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players
11,008Matches
43.9%Match win rate
61.7%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 7 players
23.8%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 7 players
16,205MVPs
4,085Hours (in match)
4,520Bombs planted
2,381Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4775,127
AWP18,005
Negev5,135
MAC-105,132
MP94,639

Lifetime map wins

9,087inferno
6,889dust2
3,537train
3,242nuke
1,763cbble
1,574vertigo
421office
194italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

679Matches
49%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
68.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

18%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1942%0.8512.5
Ancient1560%0.7811.8
Dust2911%0.9216.0
Vertigo850%0.9013.9
Overpass825%0.5910.6
Nuke650%0.8614.0
Inferno450%0.8416.5
Anubis425%0.7210.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
623msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
7.30HE damage / grenade
5.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3512% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6637% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.0218%9 Aug
ancient2–13-0.046%9 Aug
cache13–60.0315%4 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0315%4 Aug
debris6–90.0321%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0012%28 Jul
dust29–130.0821%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0318%26 Jul
cache13–110.0310%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0414%26 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0316%26 Jul
nuke0–7-0.0711%26 Jul
cache13–2-0.0216%26 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0713%26 Jul
cache13–7-0.0217%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0118%25 Jul
ancient1–13-0.026%25 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0211%24 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0821%24 Jul
cache15–150.0213%24 Jul
inferno13–100.0117%24 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0018%24 Jul
mirage8–1-0.0611%18 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0118%18 Jul
ancient13–10.0613%10 Jul
cache13–90.0823%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.0618%9 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0212%9 Jul
nuke13–80.0515%9 Jul
office9–13-0.073%9 Jul
office9–13-0.037%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0813%8 Jul
cache13–20.0731%8 Jul
ancient13–50.0313%28 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0714%28 Jun
inferno13–8-0.038%28 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0613%28 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0120%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0211%27 Jun
ancient13–60.0014%27 Jun
cache9–13-0.0229%27 Jun
train7–130.058%20 Jun
train13–9-0.0121%19 Jun
nuke13–90.0713%16 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0113%16 Jun
office13–50.0618%14 Jun
overpass13–70.0316%7 Jun
mirage9–130.0211%7 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0124%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0732%24 May
inferno9–130.0114%24 May
ancient1–13-0.1120%24 May
cache13–7-0.0013%23 May
mirage9–13-0.0415%23 May
nuke11–13-0.0013%23 May
cache12–12-0.0318%23 May
inferno8–13-0.0322%23 May
mirage13–10-0.0318%23 May
inferno13–100.0322%15 May
mirage13–11-0.0323%15 May
nuke5–13-0.0126%15 May
alpine13–9-0.0915%8 May
cache13–50.055%8 May
cache13–70.0418%8 May
cache12–12-0.0415%8 May
inferno8–13-0.0312%26 Apr
dust213–40.0229%26 Apr
mirage13–80.045%26 Apr
mirage9–13-0.039%26 Apr
anubis10–130.0121%26 Apr
inferno13–50.0116%26 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0510%26 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0417%21 Apr
overpass13–40.018%21 Apr
dust211–13-0.0410%18 Apr
inferno16–13-0.016%18 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0719%17 Apr
dust211–13-0.0511%17 Apr
mirage12–12-0.054%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.039%17 Apr
dust25–13-0.0714%17 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0316%17 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0311%15 Apr
nuke9–130.0023%14 Apr
mirage13–80.0213%12 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0813%12 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0525%11 Apr
dust27–13-0.0515%11 Apr
ancient13–60.1317%11 Apr
inferno13–40.0514%11 Apr
overpass7–13-0.084%10 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0117%10 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0110%10 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0317%9 Apr
anubis13–80.0219%6 Apr
ancient4–13-0.073%6 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0417%3 Apr
mirage13–11-0.046%3 Apr
office13–8-0.0120%19 Mar
overpass13–80.0810%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →