Dizzwaffy

Dizzwaffy — CS2 Stats

CL76561198037780470[U:1:77514742]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,215Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,985Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84497 of 261516 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,092 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +0 23 Oct – 13 Nov · 19 days played
18,54621,094peak 21,09423 Oct13 Nov
21,417Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,092Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-10-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,092
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,094 below peak (21,094)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.7%45.7%46.8%4.1% short
Shot accuracy14.5%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.731.051.060.33 short
Match win rate50.8%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDizzwaffyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,092 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,092csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning55
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.7pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.5
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time529ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 28 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 24 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 12 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 22infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2212–1055%0.02
mirageS2216–673%0.00
cacheA1810–856%0.02
anubisA127–558%-0.01
nukeD103–730%-0.00
ancientC94–544%-0.01
infernoD71–614%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,574Lifetime kills
0.73K/D
5,144Matches
50.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
42.7%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
11,002MVPs
3,814Hours (in match)
9,966Bombs planted
1,367Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4743,391
FAMAS3,903
AWP2,558
MAC-102,526
MP92,465

Lifetime map wins

12,374dust2
10,417inferno
6,438nuke
2,800train
737vertigo
66lake
51office
12safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

193Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26545%1.1215.4
Mirage5454%1.1415.9
Nuke2264%1.0314.6
Inferno1765%1.0613.4
Ancient1155%1.2915.6
Anubis838%0.8813.5
Overpass771%1.4114.3
Cache667%1.0312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
534msReaction time
51.2%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
3.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1246 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.2047% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0418%13 Nov →
cache13–50.0920%13 Nov →
dust213–110.0313%13 Nov →
dust213–30.0716%13 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0818%12 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.0619%12 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0617%11 Nov →
mirage10–130.0019%11 Nov →
cache13–60.0322%11 Nov →
mirage13–90.0219%11 Nov →
cache5–100.0112%9 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0710%8 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.038%8 Nov →
mirage13–100.0113%8 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.029%8 Nov →
ancient6–130.0121%8 Nov →
nuke13–10-0.024%8 Nov →
anubis13–7-0.0014%7 Nov →
cache13–5-0.039%7 Nov →
ancient13–80.0515%7 Nov →
mirage13–20.0512%7 Nov →
cache13–110.0411%7 Nov →
mirage13–00.0711%7 Nov →
mirage13–100.0316%7 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0312%6 Nov →
dust213–60.0623%6 Nov →
inferno13–16-0.0515%6 Nov →
dust213–40.1029%6 Nov →
mirage15–150.0221%6 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.109%5 Nov →
dust212–16-0.0418%5 Nov →
cache13–6-0.0011%5 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.006%4 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.057%4 Nov →
anubis13–60.0720%4 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0316%4 Nov →
cache16–14-0.0020%4 Nov →
anubis13–50.0319%4 Nov →
mirage7–30.0110%3 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0117%3 Nov →
anubis13–90.0221%3 Nov →
cache13–80.0717%2 Nov →
ancient2–13-0.0718%2 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0118%2 Nov →
mirage13–70.0317%1 Nov →
nuke13–80.017%1 Nov →
mirage13–90.0213%1 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0317%1 Nov →
dust213–50.0222%1 Nov →
inferno11–130.0825%31 Oct →
mirage13–40.0214%31 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0414%31 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0520%31 Oct →
dust213–110.0318%31 Oct →
cache7–130.048%31 Oct →
ancient13–70.0119%31 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0311%31 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0510%31 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0014%31 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0219%30 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.1312%30 Oct →
cache8–130.0226%30 Oct →
anubis13–10.0218%30 Oct →
nuke8–130.0214%29 Oct →
cache9–130.0311%29 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0622%29 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0517%29 Oct →
dust213–20.0223%29 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0019%29 Oct →
cache13–7-0.014%29 Oct →
cache5–130.068%28 Oct →
dust29–130.0722%28 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0217%28 Oct →
cache13–60.0515%28 Oct →
dust213–110.0414%28 Oct →
dust213–60.1220%28 Oct →
nuke13–160.0111%27 Oct →
cache10–130.0115%27 Oct →
mirage13–40.0210%27 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0410%27 Oct →
cache13–70.0514%27 Oct →
dust213–50.0511%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.0412%27 Oct →
ancient13–90.0513%26 Oct →
anubis8–130.0111%26 Oct →
inferno13–100.0114%26 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0310%26 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0114%26 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0415%26 Oct →
nuke13–80.1010%26 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0436%24 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.048%24 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0414%24 Oct →
dust220–220.0414%24 Oct →
nuke10–130.0414%24 Oct →
mirage13–60.0624%23 Oct →
dust214–160.0416%23 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.086%23 Oct →
dust210–130.0621%23 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0317%23 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.