Headhunter

Headhunter — CS2 Stats

FI76561198033164799[U:1:72899071]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

663Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,512Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,216Blue band · top ~37.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,216 +1,062 17 Sept – 4 Nov · 17 days played
11,10115,000peak 15,00017 Sept4 Nov
15,111Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,784 below peak (15,000)
  • -497 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,784 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate36.5%43.8%44.8%8.3% short
Shot accuracy12.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.021.03above
Match win rate75.9%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeadhunterFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,216 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning57
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–36–10Last 10054%Win rateWLWTWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +7.4pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.7
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch1.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.7
Utility5.7
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time539ms+47ms
first ⅓ avg 493ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 12–12 · office, 7 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · office, 7 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · office, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2212–1055%-0.01
nukeA1610–663%0.02
officeB126–650%0.05
ancientA106–460%0.01
dust2D82–625%0.00
anubisD71–614%-0.02
cacheS75–271%0.01
mirageB63–350%-0.01
vertigo—42–250%0.00
fachwerk—33–0100%0.02
train—21–150%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%0.01
debris—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,708Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
10,066Matches
75.9%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 5 players
36.5%Headshot %
12.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12,419MVPs
2,051Hours (in match)
3,886Bombs planted
1,087Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP15,906
AK-4712,706
MAG-74,386
P2504,224
P904,171

Lifetime map wins

8,481nuke
7,300dust2
4,938inferno
3,358train
3,354office
1,913vertigo
598cbble
242militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

71Matches
54%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
83.4ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke862%1.5917.3
Vertigo540%1.2414.6
Anubis333%1.4019.0
Ancient250%0.7614.0
Inferno1100%2.2518.0
Train10%1.1523.0
Dust210%0.7115.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
64.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
541msReaction time
66.0%T opening success
34.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
9.07HE damage / grenade
7.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.9129% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0320%4 Nov →
dust22–13-0.1021%4 Nov →
ancient13–6-0.0135%4 Nov →
office12–120.0420%3 Nov →
nuke13–5-0.0222%24 Oct →
ancient13–80.0113%21 Oct →
inferno13–100.1520%21 Oct →
nuke13–60.0223%21 Oct →
ancient13–10.1318%21 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0211%20 Oct →
anubis13–110.0310%20 Oct →
mirage9–130.0418%20 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.050%15 Oct →
cache13–20.0617%15 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0315%15 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0214%15 Oct →
fachwerk13–10-0.0110%13 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0213%13 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0613%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0819%13 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.007%13 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0123%12 Oct →
dust27–130.0612%12 Oct →
cache10–130.0120%12 Oct →
inferno13–50.0014%11 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0316%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0316%11 Oct →
inferno13–80.0719%10 Oct →
nuke13–40.0119%10 Oct →
cache13–90.0221%10 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0115%7 Oct →
train13–11-0.0412%7 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.064%7 Oct →
cache12–12-0.038%7 Oct →
nuke13–70.0523%6 Oct →
inferno10–130.0524%6 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0926%30 Sept →
office12–120.0713%29 Sept →
overpass13–3-0.0329%29 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0322%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0517%29 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0515%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0014%28 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.028%28 Sept →
inferno10–130.0124%27 Sept →
dust213–80.0620%27 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0334%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0426%26 Sept →
debris9–20.0231%26 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0230%24 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.017%24 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0312%24 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0211%24 Sept →
nuke12–120.0120%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0711%23 Sept →
inferno6–0-0.070%23 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0315%23 Sept →
dust213–40.0419%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0525%20 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0413%20 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.017%20 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.026%20 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0415%20 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.048%20 Sept →
nuke13–90.0510%20 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0319%17 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0312%17 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0014%13 Sept →
ancient13–70.046%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.1411%12 Sept →
nuke13–100.055%12 Sept →
fachwerk13–90.0413%9 Sept →
office12–120.038%9 Sept →
train8–130.0017%9 Sept →
anubis12–120.0423%8 Sept →
office13–80.107%8 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0119%8 Sept →
nuke13–70.1325%8 Sept →
overpass13–90.068%8 Sept →
nuke4–130.0326%7 Sept →
office11–130.0950%7 Sept →
office12–120.1521%7 Sept →
fachwerk13–70.0314%7 Sept →
office13–70.0422%6 Sept →
inferno13–50.084%6 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.006%6 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0118%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0415%6 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.039%6 Sept →
office5–13-0.0611%6 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0712%4 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0320%4 Sept →
dust25–130.0217%4 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0011%4 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0110%4 Sept →
office13–9-0.0320%4 Sept →
office13–100.0538%27 Aug →
office13–20.1225%27 Aug →
office13–11-0.040%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.