gabe

gabe — CS2 Stats

AU76561198019053079[U:1:58787351]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,808Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,529Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,457Top 25% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36969 of 251195 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+575Premier CS Rating · 22,882 → 23,457

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,457 +2,728 17 Aug – 10 Oct · 30 days played
18,88024,174peak 24,17417 Aug10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,993 +0 29 Aug – 11 Sept · 4 observations
1,9931,993peak 1,99329 Aug11 Sept
24,468Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,993Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,993
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 8 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 717 below peak (24,174)
  • +4,577 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,543 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches88——
Win rate57%——
K/D1.00——
Headshot %63%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate57.7%46.9%49.2%above
Shot accuracy17.3%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.081.120.04 short
Match win rate51.5%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgabePREMIER23,457 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,993csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time549ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 26 Sept →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 5 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 5 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3118–1358%0.03
dust2A2917–1259%0.05
infernoC104–640%0.02
ancientD93–633%0.03
cacheC83–538%0.01
anubisA74–357%0.01
nukeS64–267%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

265,737Lifetime kills
1.08K/D
11,416Matches
51.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band
57.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Pink band
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band
32,462MVPs
6,589Hours (in match)
15,741Bombs planted
5,156Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47106,252
AWP13,582
Glock-1811,178
SSG 086,913
MP95,783
MAC-105,262

Lifetime map wins

33,817dust2
21,101inferno
8,761nuke
5,994vertigo
2,864train
412office
220cbble
78lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,055Matches
47%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
70.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218241%1.0214.7
Mirage16348%1.0214.4
Ancient13743%1.0015.2
Anubis10144%0.9914.3
Inferno8940%1.0215.2
Vertigo6540%1.0015.3
Nuke4335%1.0116.1
Overpass3336%1.0617.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
535msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
5.22HE damage / grenade
16.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9535% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–4-0.0421%10 Oct →
mirage13–20.0522%10 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0425%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0322%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0921%6 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0528%6 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0029%5 Oct →
inferno13–60.1052%5 Oct →
mirage13–10.0919%5 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0121%5 Oct →
cache7–130.0330%5 Oct →
cache13–8-0.049%5 Oct →
dust210–130.0035%5 Oct →
nuke15–150.0336%4 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0315%4 Oct →
mirage13–40.0621%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.0726%4 Oct →
mirage14–160.0823%4 Oct →
dust213–20.1526%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0019%3 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0019%3 Oct →
nuke13–60.0821%3 Oct →
inferno11–130.0221%3 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0210%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0521%1 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0118%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0119%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0324%30 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0138%29 Sept →
ancient11–130.0421%29 Sept →
anubis14–160.1031%28 Sept →
mirage13–50.0115%28 Sept →
cache15–150.0828%28 Sept →
nuke16–140.0924%28 Sept →
dust213–70.1128%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0332%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0226%27 Sept →
dust213–100.0619%27 Sept →
mirage2–130.0322%27 Sept →
dust213–80.0827%27 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0135%27 Sept →
ancient13–50.1220%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0120%26 Sept →
anubis13–70.0624%26 Sept →
dust213–60.0131%26 Sept →
dust213–00.2022%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0919%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.1323%26 Sept →
mirage5–130.0324%24 Sept →
mirage13–110.0318%24 Sept →
cache2–3-0.0625%24 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0348%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0318%24 Sept →
dust212–160.0233%23 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0124%23 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0113%22 Sept →
dust212–40.0218%22 Sept →
dust213–70.0928%22 Sept →
mirage13–70.0129%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0418%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0624%21 Sept →
dust213–40.1218%21 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0141%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0417%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0628%20 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0019%20 Sept →
dust213–110.0024%20 Sept →
dust210–130.0738%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0228%20 Sept →
ancient9–00.1438%20 Sept →
dust26–130.0419%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.1218%19 Sept →
dust213–50.1728%19 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0316%17 Sept →
mirage13–50.0226%17 Sept →
inferno16–120.0823%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0231%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0227%15 Sept →
dust213–60.0616%15 Sept →
anubis16–120.0530%14 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0416%14 Sept →
dust213–90.0622%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0629%13 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0236%13 Sept →
mirage11–130.0125%8 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0323%8 Sept →
inferno10–130.0523%7 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0615%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0413%7 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0535%7 Sept →
cache13–30.0644%25 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0719%25 Aug →
ancient3–130.0527%25 Aug →
dust210–130.0319%25 Aug →
mirage13–90.0031%25 Aug →
mirage13–20.0424%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0917%19 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0125%18 Aug →
dust29–130.0629%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0116%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.