OX

OX — CS2 Stats

GR76561198193795417[U:1:233529689]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,444Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,041Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53607 of 251274 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,363 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,041 +2,042 3 Aug – 6 Oct · 33 days played
19,99923,708peak 23,7083 Aug6 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,363 +0 29 Aug – 22 Sept · 5 observations
1,3631,363peak 1,36329 Aug22 Sept
23,837Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,363Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,363
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 168 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,667 below peak (23,708)
  • -1,183 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,959 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOXFACEITLevel 6 · 1,363 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,041 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,363csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning64
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time541ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 6 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 16 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3620–1656%0.01
mirageC208–1240%-0.02
cacheB136–746%-0.02
ancientC104–640%0.00
nukeS108–280%0.01
infernoC83–538%-0.03
anubis—21–150%-0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,649Matches
49%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
81.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust225949%1.0315.1
Ancient21647%1.0615.7
Mirage15145%0.9514.3
Inferno13251%1.0315.8
Vertigo8348%1.0516.1
Nuke7956%1.1015.6
Anubis4840%0.8113.0
Overpass3453%1.0116.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
535msReaction time
62.1%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
12.13HE damage / grenade
12.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.014%9 Oct →
dust213–50.1111%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0418%6 Oct →
dust213–70.0217%6 Oct →
dust28–130.0110%5 Oct →
inferno15–150.0121%5 Oct →
mirage11–130.0115%5 Oct →
vertigo16–130.0210%4 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0013%3 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0114%29 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0429%29 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0012%29 Sept →
cache13–160.0211%29 Sept →
mirage8–130.0117%29 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0614%28 Sept →
nuke16–140.0320%28 Sept →
mirage13–70.0316%28 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0324%27 Sept →
dust210–130.0018%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0317%27 Sept →
dust211–130.0025%27 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0315%27 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0714%26 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0210%26 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.078%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0120%24 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0013%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0826%21 Sept →
nuke16–130.0917%17 Sept →
ancient8–130.0113%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.018%15 Sept →
dust213–60.1010%15 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0314%15 Sept →
dust213–70.1127%13 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0521%12 Sept →
dust25–130.0319%12 Sept →
mirage13–110.057%12 Sept →
dust213–30.0113%11 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0312%9 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.105%8 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0319%8 Sept →
dust26–130.0115%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0118%7 Sept →
dust22–13-0.038%7 Sept →
cache9–13-0.035%7 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0110%7 Sept →
dust213–60.0221%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0916%5 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.119%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.0015%3 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.057%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0017%1 Sept →
dust213–70.0920%1 Sept →
dust212–60.0320%1 Sept →
mirage13–110.0414%31 Aug →
ancient13–20.075%27 Aug →
dust213–10.0920%26 Aug →
dust213–20.0825%25 Aug →
mirage13–110.0311%25 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0318%25 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.066%25 Aug →
dust213–110.0916%24 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0215%24 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0321%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0514%23 Aug →
dust28–13-0.038%23 Aug →
mirage13–60.0723%23 Aug →
ancient13–110.0315%23 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0213%22 Aug →
mirage13–110.0211%22 Aug →
nuke8–130.0318%17 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0523%17 Aug →
cache13–30.0443%16 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0513%16 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.1015%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0113%15 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0621%15 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0410%15 Aug →
dust216–140.026%15 Aug →
dust213–70.0118%15 Aug →
ancient7–130.0218%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0711%14 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.019%14 Aug →
dust213–80.0112%14 Aug →
dust26–130.0430%13 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0110%10 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.018%10 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.037%10 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0110%10 Aug →
dust213–11-0.026%10 Aug →
ancient16–130.0519%9 Aug →
dust213–110.0329%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0415%8 Aug →
cache13–60.0416%8 Aug →
cache13–11-0.029%8 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.027%8 Aug →
nuke13–50.0313%8 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0132%5 Aug →
mirage0–8-0.097%5 Aug →
dust213–8-0.026%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.