BL1nK

BL1nK — CS2 Stats

76561198439069752[U:1:478804024]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,595Tracked matches79%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating28,010Top 5% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2475 of 251273 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,060 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,010 +7,824 24 Dec – 11 Oct · 21 days played
18,97928,098peak 28,09824 Dec11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,060 +0 29 Aug – 3 Oct · 3 observations
2,0602,060peak 2,06029 Aug3 Oct
28,098Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,060Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2025-12-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,060
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 440 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 88 below peak (28,098)
  • +6,581 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,990 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-26
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBL1nKFACEITLevel 9 · 2,060 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER28,010 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,060csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWLTWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −89ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 16–3–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 21 Feb →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · ancient, 12 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 11 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2113–862%0.02
nukeA1810–856%0.03
dust2S1812–667%0.01
infernoC177–1041%0.00
ancientB168–850%-0.01
anubisC73–443%-0.02
cache—10–10%-0.12
train—11–0100%-0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,356Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
74.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22450%1.1615.5
Dust218852%1.1715.8
Ancient13248%1.1415.6
Anubis9255%1.1714.6
Inferno8844%1.0716.1
Nuke5456%1.1716.3
Vertigo5054%1.1815.7
Overpass3165%1.3017.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
90.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
541msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
12.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5201% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–20.0820%11 Oct →
nuke7–130.0323%11 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0816%8 Oct →
inferno13–80.0733%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0114%8 Oct →
inferno13–100.0115%7 Oct →
nuke13–100.0529%7 Oct →
mirage13–60.1028%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0221%6 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0015%6 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0425%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0429%3 Oct →
dust212–40.089%22 Sept →
dust213–70.0020%22 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0220%22 Sept →
inferno13–90.0213%21 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0122%21 Sept →
dust213–70.0130%21 Sept →
inferno13–70.0324%29 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0333%27 Aug →
mirage13–60.0435%27 Aug →
ancient3–130.0336%27 Aug →
mirage13–20.0817%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0222%19 Aug →
nuke15–150.0126%13 Aug →
mirage13–50.0419%13 Aug →
mirage4–130.0017%12 Aug →
ancient13–90.0141%12 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0119%27 Jul →
ancient13–100.0327%27 Jul →
cache4–13-0.128%26 Jul →
nuke13–60.0718%26 Jul →
dust213–110.0221%26 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0528%20 Jul →
inferno16–140.0225%19 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0424%16 Jul →
nuke8–130.0110%10 Jul →
nuke13–60.1217%9 Jul →
mirage13–70.0414%9 Jul →
inferno11–130.0216%9 Jul →
dust213–70.0419%9 Jul →
mirage13–50.0719%9 Jul →
nuke13–70.0024%8 Jul →
anubis0–6-0.0317%5 Jul →
nuke13–110.0227%5 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0521%5 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0022%26 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0121%26 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0525%17 Jun →
dust28–130.0112%17 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0218%7 Jun →
mirage13–60.0321%24 May →
dust26–130.0620%24 May →
mirage9–13-0.0915%24 May →
dust213–5-0.0414%24 May →
nuke16–140.0323%24 May →
anubis3–13-0.0329%24 May →
ancient13–10-0.0019%24 May →
ancient8–130.0111%23 May →
anubis13–160.0518%23 May →
mirage13–80.0419%23 May →
anubis6–13-0.1112%23 May →
dust27–13-0.0517%17 May →
ancient5–13-0.049%17 May →
inferno11–130.0326%16 May →
dust23–13-0.0241%16 May →
mirage15–15-0.0330%16 May →
dust213–80.0320%3 May →
nuke13–30.0531%3 May →
mirage3–13-0.0124%26 Apr →
anubis13–50.0715%26 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0118%4 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0021%15 Mar →
anubis13–7-0.0324%7 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0523%21 Feb →
mirage13–70.1526%21 Feb →
ancient13–50.0717%31 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0417%31 Jan →
nuke8–130.0017%17 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0426%6 Jan →
train13–11-0.0317%4 Jan →
mirage9–130.0435%2 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0319%2 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0314%2 Jan →
mirage13–100.0827%1 Jan →
dust213–100.0020%1 Jan →
ancient13–11-0.0117%31 Dec →
dust210–10.0925%31 Dec →
nuke13–50.1123%31 Dec →
inferno15–15-0.0321%30 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.0310%30 Dec →
nuke11–130.0422%30 Dec →
inferno13–110.1040%29 Dec →
nuke9–13-0.0216%29 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.0024%28 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0636%27 Dec →
overpass7–13-0.0318%27 Dec →
inferno13–8-0.038%27 Dec →
ancient11–13-0.0622%24 Dec →
inferno8–130.0228%24 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.