TRIGGER DAN

TRIGGER DAN — CS2 Stats

76561198074828490[U:1:114562762]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,477Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,373Purple band · top ~19% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+352Premier CS Rating · 17,021 → 17,373

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,373 -818 11 Oct – 15 Nov · 32 days played
16,32418,619peak 18,61911 Oct15 Nov
19,005Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,424Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-09-24

Faceit ELO

  • 62 below peak (1,424)
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 169 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-10-16
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-10-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,246 below peak (18,619)
  • -377 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,627 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTRIGGER DANPREMIER17,373 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,424csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning45
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateWTWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.2
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time531ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 12 Nov →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 12 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 11 Nov →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 6 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12cacheWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%-0.03
mirageC218–1338%-0.03
infernoC156–940%-0.02
nukeS128–467%-0.02
anubisB105–550%-0.04
ancientA106–460%-0.01
cacheD93–633%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,193Matches
45%Win rate
0.75Avg K/D
66.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust216545%0.7711.6
Mirage15448%0.8312.0
Inferno9351%0.8513.2
Ancient8250%0.7911.9
Anubis5529%0.6611.4
Vertigo4935%0.7111.7
Nuke4351%0.8212.2
Overpass3119%0.5910.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
540msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
7.64HE damage / grenade
13.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5095% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–14-0.0614%15 Nov →
cache15–15-0.0421%15 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0219%15 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0114%15 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0514%14 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0911%14 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.0411%12 Nov →
ancient13–50.1215%12 Nov →
inferno13–70.0042%12 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0613%11 Nov →
dust215–150.015%11 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0313%11 Nov →
ancient13–3-0.0513%11 Nov →
nuke3–13-0.0510%11 Nov →
anubis14–16-0.0115%10 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0621%10 Nov →
dust28–130.0014%7 Nov →
anubis13–3-0.0229%7 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0926%7 Nov →
ancient13–8-0.0618%6 Nov →
dust213–20.0123%6 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0312%6 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.0617%5 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0419%4 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0426%4 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0414%3 Nov →
ancient16–130.0221%3 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0514%3 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0418%3 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0114%2 Nov →
nuke13–80.0111%2 Nov →
inferno13–60.0122%2 Nov →
inferno13–40.0315%2 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0524%2 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.1019%1 Nov →
nuke16–12-0.0626%1 Nov →
ancient13–16-0.0413%1 Nov →
mirage13–80.0216%1 Nov →
anubis13–3-0.0513%31 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0131%31 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0321%31 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0814%30 Oct →
nuke13–60.0212%30 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0517%29 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0310%29 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.009%29 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0221%29 Oct →
cache7–13-0.077%28 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0310%28 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.019%27 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0621%27 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.038%26 Oct →
nuke13–60.0220%26 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.069%26 Oct →
mirage13–100.0020%25 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0423%25 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0428%25 Oct →
mirage3–130.0119%25 Oct →
inferno13–90.0113%25 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0317%23 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0829%22 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0524%22 Oct →
dust211–00.0724%22 Oct →
dust214–16-0.087%22 Oct →
ancient7–130.0121%21 Oct →
dust27–13-0.096%21 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0416%20 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0823%20 Oct →
cache13–11-0.043%20 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.1312%19 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0219%19 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0113%19 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.016%18 Oct →
dust213–60.0321%18 Oct →
mirage7–130.019%18 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0025%18 Oct →
mirage13–60.008%17 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0816%16 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0211%16 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0430%16 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0518%15 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0719%15 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0429%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0813%15 Oct →
nuke13–50.0436%14 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0612%14 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0811%14 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0429%14 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0224%13 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0424%13 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0727%13 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0312%13 Oct →
dust28–130.0114%13 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0310%13 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0723%12 Oct →
cache13–9-0.016%12 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.039%12 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0219%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.019%11 Oct →
ancient13–20.0110%11 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.