Dynlo

Dynlo — CS2 Stats

FI76561198016373545[U:1:56107817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,596Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,482Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,060Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94905 of 251770 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−113Premier CS Rating · 19,173 → 19,060

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,060 +490 14 Aug – 14 Oct · 24 days played
18,08021,529peak 21,52914 Aug14 Oct
21,671Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,469 below peak (21,529)
  • -825 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 940 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches54——
Win rate37%——
K/D1.27——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.9%46.8%48.2%4.3% short
Shot accuracy16.2%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.401.061.07above
Match win rate51.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDynloFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,060 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36–61–3Last 10036%Win rateWLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time555ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 5 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 31 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · shelter, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 14anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2110–1148%0.05
nukeC198–1142%0.03
dust2D143–1121%0.02
cacheB147–750%0.04
infernoD113–827%0.06
mirageD93–633%0.02
anubisD81–713%0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.02
shelter—10–10%0.07
poseidon—10–10%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

124,122Lifetime kills
1.40K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
4,514Matches
51.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
43.9%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
26,231MVPs
1,904Hours (in match)
5,228Bombs planted
1,693Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,882
AWP9,469
FAMAS2,290
MP91,767
MAC-101,205

Lifetime map wins

8,286nuke
3,040dust2
2,011inferno
1,909train
1,139vertigo
354cbble
130italy
43office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

190Matches
57%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
91.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2673%1.9221.3
Dust21947%1.1921.0
Nuke1776%1.6619.9
Mirage1638%1.2720.0
Cache1644%1.1517.6
Anubis729%1.0512.4
Inferno520%1.1620.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
543msReaction time
41.9%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
7.04HE damage / grenade
9.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.0322%14 Oct →
dust29–130.0014%14 Oct →
ancient16–120.1112%14 Oct →
nuke13–70.0916%13 Oct →
ancient5–130.0418%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.024%13 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0410%12 Oct →
ancient13–40.1114%12 Oct →
inferno13–80.0133%12 Oct →
anubis6–130.0318%4 Oct →
nuke10–130.0122%3 Oct →
dust27–130.0518%2 Oct →
dust27–130.0112%2 Oct →
nuke13–100.1611%2 Oct →
cache10–130.0021%2 Oct →
anubis11–130.0114%2 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0322%26 Sept →
ancient10–130.0914%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0217%26 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0213%26 Sept →
ancient10–130.0318%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0322%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0623%24 Sept →
inferno7–30.0913%24 Sept →
dust213–100.0611%24 Sept →
dust213–50.1123%24 Sept →
nuke9–130.0319%22 Sept →
inferno10–130.0722%12 Sept →
dust22–13-0.089%12 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0713%12 Sept →
nuke7–130.0414%11 Sept →
cache5–13-0.057%11 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.058%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0116%11 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0319%11 Sept →
anubis11–130.109%11 Sept →
nuke2–130.0419%11 Sept →
inferno15–150.0726%10 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0118%10 Sept →
cache13–30.1622%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0510%9 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.028%9 Sept →
nuke5–130.0428%9 Sept →
vertigo6–90.0220%9 Sept →
inferno5–90.0216%9 Sept →
ancient13–100.0624%8 Sept →
cache13–100.2026%5 Sept →
nuke2–130.0718%5 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0724%5 Sept →
vertigo9–60.0312%5 Sept →
nuke9–70.0915%5 Sept →
inferno9–10.2526%5 Sept →
shelter5–130.0722%5 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0218%5 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0119%5 Sept →
cache5–130.0212%4 Sept →
cache13–110.1024%4 Sept →
nuke13–160.0718%4 Sept →
ancient13–10.1224%4 Sept →
cache1–130.0516%4 Sept →
dust25–130.1221%4 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0919%4 Sept →
ancient13–70.0927%3 Sept →
inferno10–130.0730%3 Sept →
mirage13–160.0915%3 Sept →
ancient14–160.1018%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0321%2 Sept →
ancient11–130.0121%2 Sept →
anubis13–40.1211%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.1021%2 Sept →
nuke16–140.0214%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0821%1 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0018%31 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0122%31 Aug →
inferno11–130.0224%31 Aug →
nuke13–70.0919%31 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0239%31 Aug →
ancient13–70.1023%31 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0416%21 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0027%21 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0819%20 Aug →
cache13–100.0421%20 Aug →
mirage4–130.016%20 Aug →
ancient15–150.0611%20 Aug →
ancient13–90.0819%14 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0122%14 Aug →
mirage13–100.0033%13 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0316%13 Aug →
ancient16–140.0515%13 Aug →
dust27–130.0617%13 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0414%8 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.119%8 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0317%8 Aug →
nuke3–6-0.068%7 Aug →
ancient10–130.0228%7 Aug →
mirage8–130.0418%7 Aug →
nuke8–130.0114%7 Aug →
cache11–130.0425%7 Aug →
cache3–13-0.074%6 Aug →
nuke6–130.0718%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.