Barry Chuckle — CS2 Stats
ME76561198010986136[U:1:50720408]Steam profile ↗1 game ban
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (52 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
No change since then — still 363 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- At peak — 18,752
- +1,343 over 30 days · improving
- +11,884 over 90 days
- Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,248 to go
- Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
- Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
- Blue band first seen 2026-09-18
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 3 median | Level 4 median | vs Level 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 29.7% | 41.8% | 42.7% | 13.1% short |
| Shot accuracy | 14.9% | 12.2% | 11.2% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.08 short |
| Match win rate | 38.2% | 43.3% | 43.9% | 5.8% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction
Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.02
- Avg headshot accuracy 11%
- Avg reaction 303ms
Last 10
- 6–4 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.03
- Avg headshot accuracy 10%
- Avg reaction 343ms
Last 20
- 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
- Avg rating 0.02
- Avg headshot accuracy 10%
- Avg reaction 344ms
Newest first, from the last 66 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 66 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 66 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | B | 15 | 7–8 | 47% | -0.04 |
 inferno | A | 12 | 7–5 | 58% | -0.02 |
 anubis | D | 9 | 3–6 | 33% | -0.03 |
 dust2 | S | 8 | 6–2 | 75% | 0.00 |
 ancient | C | 8 | 3–5 | 38% | -0.02 |
 cache | S | 6 | 5–1 | 83% | 0.02 |
 nuke | S | 5 | 4–1 | 80% | 0.00 |
 overpass | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | -0.07 |
Across the last 66 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 10.0692% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3321 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inferno | 13–7 | 0.04 | 12% | 9 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 7 Sept → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.01 | 13% | 3 Sept → | |
| inferno | 16–13 | -0.03 | 4% | 3 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.09 | 11% | 31 Aug → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | 0.08 | 10% | 30 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.06 | 14% | 29 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.01 | 0% | 23 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.04 | 13% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.02 | 4% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.04 | 10% | 23 Aug → | |
| anubis | 16–13 | 0.05 | 14% | 20 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.05 | 5% | 20 Aug → | |
| inferno | 15–15 | 0.04 | 8% | 20 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | 0.01 | 5% | 19 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.01 | 12% | 19 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–11 | 0.04 | 8% | 19 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–3 | 0.01 | 17% | 18 Aug → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | 0.06 | 19% | 15 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | -0.08 | 0% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.01 | 4% | 13 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | 0.02 | 23% | 13 Aug → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 11 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.01 | 7% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.02 | 9% | 11 Aug → | |
| ancient | 5–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.07 | 8% | 11 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–9 | -0.00 | 6% | 10 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–3 | 0.02 | 8% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.01 | 14% | 10 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | 0.04 | 17% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.10 | 10% | 9 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–10 | 0.02 | 16% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.07 | 6% | 23 Jul → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.07 | 8% | 26 Jun → | |
| ancient | 3–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 16 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.01 | 9% | 16 Jun → | |
| overpass | 13–11 | -0.09 | 13% | 16 Jun → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.05 | 5% | 16 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–11 | -0.07 | 5% | 16 Jun → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.06 | 7% | 14 Jun → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 13 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | -0.02 | 8% | 13 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | -0.07 | 18% | 13 Jun → | |
| ancient | 14–16 | -0.11 | 4% | 13 Jun → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.12 | 17% | 30 Apr → | |
| anubis | 10–4 | -0.10 | 27% | 30 Apr → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.07 | 10% | 30 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.03 | 13% | 30 Apr → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.06 | 7% | 30 Mar → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.04 | 7% | 26 Mar → | |
| mirage | 9–2 | -0.01 | 14% | 26 Mar → | |
| inferno | 4–13 | -0.12 | 17% | 17 Mar → | |
| overpass | 4–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 17 Mar → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.11 | 10% | 16 Mar → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | -0.06 | 20% | 16 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.06 | 16% | 14 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 16–13 | -0.00 | 13% | 14 Mar → | |
| ancient | 5–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 13 Mar → | |
| overpass | 13–11 | -0.09 | 19% | 13 Mar → | |
| anubis | 14–16 | -0.09 | 10% | 13 Mar → | |
| mirage | 16–14 | -0.08 | 12% | 13 Mar → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 3 Mar → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | -0.07 | 11% | 2 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–16 | -0.07 | 14% | 2 Mar → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | -0.05 | 27% | 2 Mar → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.