BakkiS

BakkiS — CS2 Stats

NO76561198010530917[U:1:50265189]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

832Tracked matches66%Win rate2023Tracked since
801Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,596Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,157 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,596 +2,092 4 Sept – 28 Oct · 15 days played
15,50417,596peak 17,5964 Sept28 Oct
17,823Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,157Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,157
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,596
  • +647 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,404 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate39.1%44.8%45.7%6.6% short
Shot accuracy9.0%12.4%12.7%3.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.031.050.05 short
Match win rate46.4%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBakkiSFACEITLevel 6 · 1,157 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,596 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,157csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning59
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWLWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.9
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time508ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 516ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 8–4 · rush_001, 30 Sept →
24%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 23 Oct →
320msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2815–1354%-0.03
nukeA2214–864%-0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.01
cacheS139–469%-0.01
mirageA95–456%-0.01
ancientD93–633%-0.03
dust2—30–30%-0.05
poseidon—11–0100%0.02
debris—10–10%0.12
rush_001—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,743Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
1,905Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
39.1%Headshot %
9.0%Shot accuracy
4,026MVPs
801Hours (in match)
2,400Bombs planted
448Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,076inferno
2,682dust2
2,010nuke
410train
199cbble
98vertigo
75italy
32assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

215Matches
53%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
72.4ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5155%0.8913.1
Nuke4052%0.8113.7
Ancient2955%0.9012.3
Anubis2748%1.0215.2
Mirage2556%0.8913.2
Cache2050%0.9013.8
Overpass1547%0.7512.5
Train367%0.6810.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
512msReaction time
45.0%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
12.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.0445% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–8-0.035%28 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0221%28 Oct →
mirage13–90.0915%28 Oct →
anubis13–70.019%28 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.008%27 Oct →
dust29–13-0.076%27 Oct →
cache13–110.0510%27 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.055%27 Oct →
ancient13–60.007%26 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0516%26 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0211%26 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0720%25 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.1912%25 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.055%24 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0121%24 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.046%24 Oct →
inferno13–10.0012%24 Oct →
ancient13–90.039%24 Oct →
inferno13–20.0313%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0410%24 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0317%24 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0913%24 Oct →
poseidon9–70.0214%24 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.059%24 Oct →
nuke13–20.0424%23 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0610%23 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0315%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0314%22 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.048%22 Oct →
cache13–80.0816%22 Oct →
anubis13–30.0311%22 Oct →
inferno13–70.0110%22 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.037%22 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.078%22 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.103%22 Oct →
nuke9–50.0917%22 Oct →
cache16–130.0315%21 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0912%21 Oct →
inferno10–130.007%19 Oct →
cache13–8-0.056%19 Oct →
nuke19–16-0.048%19 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.085%19 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0819%18 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.058%17 Oct →
anubis10–130.026%17 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0914%17 Oct →
inferno14–160.016%16 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.049%16 Oct →
ancient11–130.037%16 Oct →
cache13–5-0.057%16 Oct →
cache13–20.0416%15 Oct →
nuke13–100.0313%15 Oct →
anubis7–130.0211%15 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.058%14 Oct →
anubis13–50.047%14 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.017%14 Oct →
mirage16–140.0411%14 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0724%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0416%11 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0316%11 Oct →
debris8–80.1213%11 Oct →
nuke13–60.005%9 Oct →
cache13–90.0213%9 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.105%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.119%9 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.015%9 Oct →
anubis7–130.027%9 Oct →
cache16–13-0.072%8 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.033%8 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.077%8 Oct →
cache8–130.0015%6 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0116%6 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0214%5 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0218%5 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0610%4 Oct →
inferno13–70.117%4 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0111%1 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0016%1 Oct →
nuke16–140.038%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0111%30 Sept →
dust21–13-0.1013%30 Sept →
nuke13–40.048%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.039%30 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0821%30 Sept →
rush_0018–40.1520%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.037%21 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.019%21 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0114%21 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0217%14 Sept →
nuke16–120.0411%13 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0118%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.038%11 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.036%11 Sept →
cache13–10-0.018%11 Sept →
mirage13–20.0315%4 Sept →
nuke11–130.0418%4 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0623%29 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0112%29 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0218%29 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.1110%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.