FieryDawn

FieryDawn — CS2 Stats

FI76561198009335511[U:1:49069783]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,009Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,073Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.4 LearningClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,009 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 4 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,024 +337 4 Dec5 Jan · 6 days played
3,5754,346peak 4,3464 Dec5 Jan
4,346Peak Premier in tracked matches
820Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2025-12-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate39.4%41.9%42.7%3.3% short
Shot accuracy7.7%12.2%11.3%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.720.980.990.28 short
Match win rate39.9%43.3%43.9%4.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFieryDawnFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO820csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim18
Positioning33
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37567Last 10037%Win rateLTWLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim1.8
Utility4.5
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.0

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 58% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.8
Positioning3.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics2.1
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact1.9

Composite 2.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time633ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy10.3%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 10.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–8 · overpass, 23 Jan
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · office, 10 Mar
398msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · office, 2 Sept
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 29 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 52% over 25vertigoWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB25131252%-0.04
cacheC145936%-0.07
vertigoD91811%-0.07
anubisD92722%-0.06
italyC83538%-0.06
ancientC83538%-0.05
nukeC73443%-0.06
overpassB63350%-0.04
trainD51420%-0.07
alpine31233%-0.09
inferno21150%-0.07
warden21150%-0.03
stronghold1010%-0.05
agency1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,093Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
1,660Matches
39.9%Match win rate
39.4%Headshot %
7.7%Shot accuracy
2,052MVPs
635Hours (in match)
1,805Bombs planted
275Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,257vertigo
1,948office
1,715nuke
1,420inferno
689train
579dust2
303italy
164cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
38%Win rate
0.53Avg K/D
53.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis838%0.6610.6
Ancient560%0.517.6
Dust2333%0.518.7
Train30%0.459.3
Nuke333%0.579.0
Overpass10%0.152.0
Mirage10%0.336.0
Inferno1100%0.5012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
25.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
59.3%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
617msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
16.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.43HE damage / grenade
4.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.272% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.562% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train1–13-0.076%12 Sept
cache12–12-0.088%12 Sept
office13–6-0.1016%12 Sept
office8–13-0.0312%2 Sept
office9–13-0.0113%2 Sept
italy11–13-0.0811%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0816%29 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.085%29 Aug
cache6–13-0.063%28 Aug
office13–11-0.0813%28 Aug
cache13–7-0.0517%25 Aug
office13–6-0.005%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.106%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.078%8 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1013%5 Aug
cache3–13-0.0610%5 Aug
office13–10-0.066%15 Jul
train1–13-0.085%8 Jul
cache13–11-0.0510%8 Jul
office1–13-0.1016%8 Jul
cache12–12-0.093%27 Jun
office12–120.0613%29 May
cache13–11-0.0512%29 May
office13–90.0014%6 May
cache9–50.0018%6 May
italy0–2-0.030%6 May
office13–11-0.0314%6 May
cache9–13-0.0714%1 May
cache7–13-0.154%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.129%30 Apr
italy1–13-0.0710%30 Apr
office13–10-0.0621%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0410%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.050%30 Apr
train13–11-0.0410%25 Apr
overpass13–5-0.044%9 Apr
nuke3–13-0.080%4 Apr
ancient10–50.005%3 Apr
office5–13-0.0616%27 Mar
alpine13–8-0.0818%20 Mar
overpass9–13-0.1310%13 Mar
ancient13–6-0.106%13 Mar
italy13–9-0.0810%10 Mar
office13–9-0.0933%10 Mar
anubis6–13-0.1012%8 Mar
office13–8-0.0015%6 Mar
italy5–13-0.096%6 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0914%2 Mar
anubis12–16-0.0913%2 Mar
ancient13–110.0316%1 Mar
vertigo13–11-0.057%27 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.125%21 Feb
ancient4–13-0.097%15 Feb
overpass5–13-0.037%15 Feb
italy13–3-0.034%15 Feb
office12–12-0.0011%15 Feb
office13–4-0.0110%15 Feb
alpine11–13-0.089%7 Feb
warden13–8-0.016%7 Feb
vertigo2–13-0.050%6 Feb
office7–13-0.0114%6 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.017%2 Feb
warden10–13-0.053%2 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0316%31 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0813%31 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0711%30 Jan
anubis13–16-0.0211%30 Jan
nuke13–20.0213%29 Jan
nuke4–13-0.068%29 Jan
ancient4–13-0.087%27 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0619%27 Jan
alpine3–13-0.1022%23 Jan
office13–4-0.0214%23 Jan
office7–13-0.1315%23 Jan
overpass13–80.0710%23 Jan
stronghold10–13-0.058%22 Jan
anubis13–9-0.027%22 Jan
vertigo12–12-0.1014%18 Jan
office13–100.0316%18 Jan
italy8–13-0.0712%9 Jan
agency12–12-0.047%9 Jan
office11–130.0113%9 Jan
overpass5–13-0.069%5 Jan
vertigo5–13-0.0413%5 Jan
office7–13-0.0115%4 Jan
train11–13-0.102%3 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0518%3 Jan
office7–13-0.058%21 Dec
nuke13–110.0216%18 Dec
nuke16–14-0.122%12 Dec
overpass13–11-0.034%12 Dec
vertigo12–12-0.1320%12 Dec
italy13–8-0.066%12 Dec
office13–5-0.0213%12 Dec
anubis0–9-0.0718%12 Dec
nuke2–13-0.100%9 Dec
vertigo8–13-0.0511%5 Dec
anubis13–4-0.0417%5 Dec
office5–13-0.1016%5 Dec
train8–13-0.0711%4 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →