Scream

Scream — CS2 Stats

NO76561198008067918[U:1:47802190]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,218Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,201Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,115Top 50% of 210,584 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80501 of 257635 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,115 -1,330 30 Aug – 25 Oct · 20 days played
18,93222,507peak 22,50730 Aug25 Oct
23,214Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,392 below peak (22,507)
  • +675 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,885 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate39.8%41.8%42.7%2.9% short
Shot accuracy13.6%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.170.980.99above
Match win rate43.1%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGScreamFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER20,115 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning77
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWWWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.9
Positioning7.7
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch7.6

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 76% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 76% on T to 58% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning7.7
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels8.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time497ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 25 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 14 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 7 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB199–1047%0.01
infernoD185–1328%0.02
ancientS1711–665%0.02
nukeA1610–663%0.02
mirageD124–833%0.00
dust2S96–367%0.01
cacheA95–456%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

196,839Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
8,105Matches
43.1%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
22,911MVPs
3,703Hours (in match)
10,921Bombs planted
1,934Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4753,644
AWP36,519
Tec-95,531
P2504,923
MAC-104,053
MP93,772

Lifetime map wins

22,953inferno
13,084nuke
7,415dust2
2,840office
2,802vertigo
1,255train
476cbble
92militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
63%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
86.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

58%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient367%1.3419.0
Mirage250%1.0618.5
Dust210%0.8612.0
Inferno1100%1.3619.0
Overpass1100%1.1515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
499msReaction time
76.5%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
9.33HE damage / grenade
3.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3386 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–20.0611%25 Oct →
mirage13–70.0424%25 Oct →
nuke13–110.0519%25 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0121%25 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0315%25 Oct →
anubis4–130.0015%21 Oct →
nuke13–60.0825%21 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0510%21 Oct →
dust213–60.0418%21 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0422%21 Oct →
ancient13–110.0514%18 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0316%17 Oct →
anubis13–70.0512%17 Oct →
cache13–110.0120%17 Oct →
cache10–130.0321%17 Oct →
inferno13–50.0516%17 Oct →
mirage13–160.0820%17 Oct →
anubis11–130.049%14 Oct →
inferno13–60.1225%14 Oct →
anubis9–130.0220%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0635%14 Oct →
anubis10–130.0115%14 Oct →
inferno15–150.0823%11 Oct →
inferno2–130.0922%11 Oct →
anubis13–50.1013%11 Oct →
anubis13–50.088%11 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0713%10 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0116%10 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0322%10 Oct →
inferno13–160.0722%10 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0116%10 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.018%10 Oct →
mirage9–10.0117%10 Oct →
inferno10–130.0320%9 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0210%9 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0312%7 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0519%7 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0420%7 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0218%7 Oct →
inferno13–70.0028%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0427%7 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0115%7 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0213%7 Oct →
mirage8–130.0110%26 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.007%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.025%26 Sept →
cache9–130.0315%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0411%26 Sept →
nuke5–130.0225%26 Sept →
ancient9–130.0415%26 Sept →
nuke13–50.008%26 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0116%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0414%26 Sept →
mirage9–130.0318%25 Sept →
ancient13–90.0016%25 Sept →
anubis11–130.038%25 Sept →
dust211–130.048%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.0522%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.2011%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0413%22 Sept →
inferno11–130.0317%22 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0311%22 Sept →
inferno16–120.088%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0520%20 Sept →
anubis9–130.0414%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0217%20 Sept →
inferno11–130.0214%20 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.078%20 Sept →
ancient13–90.1316%20 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0817%19 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0319%19 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.069%18 Sept →
ancient4–130.0022%18 Sept →
nuke13–30.0426%18 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0310%18 Sept →
dust28–13-0.017%18 Sept →
mirage16–140.0622%18 Sept →
nuke13–110.0718%18 Sept →
cache13–60.1724%18 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0418%18 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.014%16 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0512%16 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0416%16 Sept →
cache13–60.0711%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0320%16 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0525%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.0311%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.0516%13 Sept →
cache13–80.0523%13 Sept →
nuke13–80.0335%13 Sept →
ancient10–130.0322%13 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0125%13 Sept →
nuke9–130.0120%7 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0716%7 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0028%7 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0213%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0415%7 Sept →
anubis13–70.0113%7 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0321%2 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0321%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.