Wang Jingwei

Wang Jingwei — CS2 Stats

NO76561198007926541[U:1:47660813]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,238Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
5,800Hours in CS90Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,718Top 50% of 210,584 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72738 of 257639 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,718 +2,193 30 Aug – 25 Oct · 23 days played
16,66620,905peak 20,90530 Aug25 Oct
21,509Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 187 below peak (20,905)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,282 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate37.9%46.9%49.3%11.4% short
Shot accuracy9.4%13.0%13.4%4.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.081.120.06 short
Match win rate45.4%46.7%48.5%3.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Red band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWang JingweiPREMIER20,718 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning61
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateLLWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time514ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy10.9%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 15 Oct →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 13 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 21 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 15dust2Weakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C188–1044%0.00
infernoB179–853%0.02
nukeS1512–380%0.03
mirageS1510–567%0.03
anubisA149–564%0.00
ancientB126–650%0.02
cacheC94–544%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,871Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
3,761Matches
45.4%Match win rate
37.9%Headshot %
9.4%Shot accuracy
7,933MVPs
1,577Hours (in match)
4,217Bombs planted
1,029Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,404inferno
5,509nuke
3,713dust2
1,089vertigo
1,016train
222cbble
167dust
107italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.9%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
516msReaction time
57.8%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
10.83HE damage / grenade
7.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.8959% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0211%25 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1015%25 Oct →
ancient13–20.1111%25 Oct →
mirage13–70.058%25 Oct →
nuke13–110.0513%25 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.019%25 Oct →
anubis13–50.079%25 Oct →
dust213–8-0.016%25 Oct →
dust211–130.027%24 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.057%23 Oct →
cache8–130.0425%21 Oct →
nuke13–40.126%21 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.084%21 Oct →
nuke13–60.0415%21 Oct →
ancient9–130.0517%21 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0014%21 Oct →
nuke13–50.0811%21 Oct →
anubis13–20.0812%20 Oct →
mirage13–80.168%20 Oct →
dust213–60.0625%20 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.055%20 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0214%20 Oct →
anubis16–140.0714%20 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0214%19 Oct →
inferno13–20.084%19 Oct →
nuke13–40.0211%19 Oct →
dust29–130.1313%19 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.028%19 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.013%19 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.057%19 Oct →
dust29–13-0.037%18 Oct →
nuke13–20.047%18 Oct →
nuke13–10.1521%18 Oct →
mirage5–130.0317%18 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.038%18 Oct →
dust29–130.037%18 Oct →
inferno5–130.0714%18 Oct →
cache13–90.006%18 Oct →
dust210–130.029%17 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0120%17 Oct →
cache13–11-0.029%17 Oct →
cache10–13-0.059%17 Oct →
inferno13–50.008%17 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0213%17 Oct →
dust213–60.0615%17 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.019%16 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0213%16 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.026%16 Oct →
nuke13–160.0214%16 Oct →
ancient13–60.0612%15 Oct →
inferno13–40.1813%15 Oct →
inferno6–130.0115%15 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0415%15 Oct →
inferno13–60.0515%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0223%15 Oct →
anubis13–50.0513%15 Oct →
inferno13–40.0824%14 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0310%14 Oct →
ancient9–130.0111%14 Oct →
anubis13–110.033%14 Oct →
dust213–30.0610%14 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.017%14 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0219%13 Oct →
inferno13–20.074%13 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0912%13 Oct →
ancient13–70.0010%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0223%13 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0214%13 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.039%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0228%13 Oct →
mirage13–100.1217%12 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0117%12 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.069%12 Oct →
nuke13–50.0010%12 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.056%10 Oct →
anubis13–100.007%10 Oct →
ancient13–80.0318%10 Oct →
mirage9–10.0024%10 Oct →
mirage13–80.1120%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0210%8 Oct →
dust27–130.0013%8 Oct →
dust25–13-0.086%8 Oct →
mirage13–60.009%8 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0210%7 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0415%7 Oct →
inferno13–70.013%7 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0320%7 Oct →
cache9–13-0.027%6 Oct →
ancient13–90.0815%5 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.012%5 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0215%5 Oct →
cache10–130.0116%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.019%4 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0112%4 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.079%4 Oct →
inferno9–130.078%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0510%4 Oct →
ancient13–100.009%4 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0214%4 Oct →
mirage13–40.0711%3 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.