Red X

Red X — CS2 Stats

76561198006352373[U:1:46086645]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

948Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,105Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,797Purple band · top ~17.3% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 948 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 5 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,797 +3,441 5 Apr15 Sept · 26 days played
12,69418,419peak 18,4195 Apr15 Sept
18,419Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-04-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 622 below peak (18,419)
  • -622 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,798 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,203 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,214), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate40.0%44.3%47.0%7.0% short
Shot accuracy10.1%11.8%13.0%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.711.031.080.37 short
Match win rate40.9%45.2%46.7%5.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRed XPREMIER17,797 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning40
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50455Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility5.4
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time589ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 4 Jul
30%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 26 Jul
414msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 9 Aug
13–2Biggest win · cache, 18 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1913668%-0.03
nukeD1861233%-0.02
anubisB157847%-0.02
cacheA127558%-0.02
infernoC114736%-0.04
dust2D82625%-0.03
overpassS64267%-0.01
mirageA53260%-0.02
vertigo43175%-0.02
shelter1010%-0.06
warden110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,068Lifetime kills
0.71K/D
1,576Matches
40.9%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
2,146MVPs
683Hours (in match)
1,388Bombs planted
518Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,096inferno
1,548nuke
1,309vertigo
1,174dust2
547train
29italy
28cbble
9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

94Matches
49%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
67.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1656%0.9814.0
Ancient1354%0.9714.0
Vertigo1050%0.8413.4
Mirage922%0.8514.2
Cache771%0.9316.7
Nuke520%1.0115.2
Overpass425%0.7012.8
Dust2475%0.7811.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
587msReaction time
19.3%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3203% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0918%9 Sept
nuke2–13-0.070%9 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0717%4 Sept
shelter7–13-0.0627%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0519%3 Sept
ancient13–7-0.060%3 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0412%29 Aug
dust22–13-0.089%29 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0918%29 Aug
vertigo13–110.0726%23 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0421%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.019%22 Aug
nuke13–160.0223%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.0224%22 Aug
cache7–13-0.0314%22 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0711%21 Aug
mirage13–7-0.047%21 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0614%10 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0611%10 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0216%9 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1126%9 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.015%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0521%26 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0024%26 Jul
cache1–13-0.0430%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0516%21 Jul
ancient13–90.0314%19 Jul
cache15–15-0.0016%19 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0017%19 Jul
cache13–20.028%18 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0716%18 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0521%15 Jul
cache13–80.0019%15 Jul
ancient8–130.0314%13 Jul
cache13–10-0.028%10 Jul
dust25–130.0320%10 Jul
nuke2–13-0.094%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0116%10 Jul
overpass9–5-0.0115%4 Jul
nuke9–40.1016%4 Jul
inferno8–8-0.147%4 Jul
vertigo9–7-0.0616%4 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0026%3 Jul
ancient13–5-0.003%3 Jul
inferno16–140.0213%2 Jul
nuke4–13-0.010%2 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0313%1 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0424%1 Jul
ancient13–100.0211%26 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0127%26 Jun
anubis16–12-0.0420%23 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0218%23 Jun
nuke10–13-0.086%22 Jun
dust29–13-0.0317%22 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0118%18 Jun
ancient13–100.0212%18 Jun
overpass6–13-0.019%13 Jun
dust29–13-0.0224%13 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0423%13 Jun
dust215–15-0.0417%10 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0022%7 Jun
nuke13–30.0516%6 Jun
anubis13–20.0220%6 Jun
dust25–13-0.0220%6 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0517%6 Jun
anubis13–50.0622%4 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0315%4 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0615%1 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0510%1 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0817%27 May
overpass13–60.0523%25 May
ancient16–130.0116%25 May
cache12–12-0.058%22 May
nuke15–150.038%21 May
anubis13–9-0.0222%21 May
ancient13–80.0116%20 May
anubis13–8-0.0010%14 May
anubis10–13-0.0318%14 May
nuke13–11-0.0123%13 May
inferno3–13-0.0827%13 May
overpass13–80.0116%13 May
anubis13–16-0.0613%10 May
ancient13–9-0.1013%10 May
mirage13–90.0418%3 May
nuke12–16-0.0519%3 May
cache19–170.0018%3 May
ancient8–13-0.0610%3 May
cache13–100.0320%3 May
cache16–14-0.016%30 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0116%30 Apr
dust213–6-0.054%29 Apr
inferno13–30.0425%27 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0617%27 Apr
inferno10–130.0127%25 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0218%25 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0621%23 Apr
inferno1–13-0.0715%23 Apr
warden13–7-0.036%5 Apr
anubis13–4-0.018%5 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0212%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →