ЯΛKZ

ЯΛKZ — CS2 Stats

SE76561197998001737[U:1:37736009]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,042Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,252Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,886Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23386 of 252199 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,886 +1,794 10 Jun – 2 Oct · 17 days played
23,09225,119peak 25,11910 Jun2 Oct
25,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 233 below peak (25,119)
  • +790 over 30 days · improving
  • +120 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 114 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches94——
Win rate47%——
K/D1.32——
Headshot %66%——

Measured 15 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.8%48.2%50.9%7.2% short
Shot accuracy13.3%13.2%13.7%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.311.071.09above
Match win rate44.2%46.9%48.4%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGЯΛKZFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,886 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning48
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLLTWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility3.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.8
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time507ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.45Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 27 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · vertigo, 26 Jul →
328msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 15 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C228–1436%0.02
infernoA2112–957%0.04
cacheA117–464%0.03
vertigoS107–370%0.15
mirageS86–275%0.05
nukeS75–271%0.03
anubisD62–433%-0.00
ancient—40–40%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%0.07
debris—11–0100%0.18
eldorado—11–0100%0.11
train—10–10%-0.07
shelter—10–10%-0.08
boulder—10–10%0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.11
stronghold—10–10%0.02
alpine—10–10%0.18
office—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

137,923Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
6,242Matches
44.2%Match win rate
43.8%Headshot %
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17,942MVPs
3,713Hours (in match)
4,601Bombs planted
2,218Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,453
AWP17,147
P906,326
AUG2,315

Lifetime map wins

24,513dust2
5,207inferno
3,629nuke
1,769vertigo
906office
360cbble
329train
198lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

253Matches
55%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
83.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1662%1.6617.9
Mirage1540%1.0713.5
Dust21331%1.0616.6
Vertigo967%0.9414.4
Inferno862%1.3817.5
Anubis633%1.1016.7
Ancient40%0.8313.8
Overpass250%1.1722.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
516msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
3.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4861 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.509% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.059%2 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0329%2 Oct →
vertigo8–80.0529%30 Sept →
inferno9–30.1324%30 Sept →
inferno2–130.0819%30 Sept →
inferno13–70.0824%29 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0015%28 Sept →
dust213–50.0518%28 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0414%24 Sept →
mirage13–10.1231%24 Sept →
dust29–130.0528%24 Sept →
inferno11–40.0722%24 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0412%9 Sept →
inferno6–130.0513%2 Sept →
ancient6–130.0117%2 Sept →
dust213–30.1926%2 Sept →
vertigo9–10.0619%1 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0327%29 Aug →
dust215–150.0620%29 Aug →
inferno3–90.0424%29 Aug →
nuke9–60.0731%27 Aug →
vertigo9–20.4534%27 Aug →
inferno9–50.109%27 Aug →
cache15–150.0010%18 Aug →
dust213–40.0516%18 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0018%16 Aug →
dust213–40.0219%16 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0213%15 Aug →
dust213–50.0518%15 Aug →
mirage13–100.0921%15 Aug →
dust25–13-0.098%15 Aug →
inferno13–110.0115%14 Aug →
inferno13–10.0822%14 Aug →
mirage13–00.0232%14 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0220%14 Aug →
dust26–130.0117%14 Aug →
vertigo4–130.1129%6 Aug →
inferno11–130.0524%6 Aug →
mirage13–90.0423%5 Aug →
debris9–60.1816%30 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.137%30 Jul →
vertigo9–30.1913%30 Jul →
vertigo9–60.1917%30 Jul →
vertigo4–90.0741%26 Jul →
eldorado9–60.1128%25 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0212%20 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0119%13 Jul →
dust213–40.0425%13 Jul →
overpass13–20.0616%13 Jul →
train8–13-0.0711%13 Jul →
inferno9–70.1519%11 Jul →
shelter4–13-0.0823%11 Jul →
boulder5–130.0330%11 Jul →
fachwerk10–130.1122%11 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0620%11 Jul →
stronghold6–130.0224%8 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0119%8 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0320%8 Jul →
inferno13–110.0115%8 Jul →
nuke12–120.0624%8 Jul →
dust27–130.0422%8 Jul →
vertigo13–80.2325%8 Jul →
mirage9–130.0522%8 Jul →
overpass13–60.0822%8 Jul →
inferno2–130.0018%8 Jul →
nuke13–60.0818%8 Jul →
anubis12–120.0424%8 Jul →
vertigo13–110.1615%7 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0219%7 Jul →
dust212–120.0614%7 Jul →
cache8–130.089%7 Jul →
alpine6–130.1821%7 Jul →
cache13–60.1216%6 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0015%5 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0621%1 Jul →
nuke13–70.0421%1 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0016%1 Jul →
dust213–50.0128%1 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0617%30 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0111%29 Jun →
mirage10–130.0224%28 Jun →
inferno13–110.0217%28 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0415%23 Jun →
dust25–3-0.0519%23 Jun →
nuke13–70.0014%23 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0715%22 Jun →
dust25–13-0.039%21 Jun →
anubis10–30.0924%21 Jun →
cache13–10.0718%21 Jun →
dust21–110.0516%21 Jun →
inferno13–100.0220%20 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0019%20 Jun →
dust28–130.0924%19 Jun →
dust28–130.0821%17 Jun →
office8–130.0123%17 Jun →
inferno13–80.0920%10 Jun →
vertigo13–110.0120%7 Jun →
inferno5–130.0221%7 Jun →
cache8–10.1725%7 Jun →
mirage13–100.1021%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.