LordZerra

LordZerra — CS2 Stats

76561198169878101[U:1:209612373]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

773Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,149Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29901 of 252176 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,149 +3,070 14 Aug – 13 Oct · 23 days played
21,07924,454peak 24,45414 Aug13 Oct
24,545Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 305 below peak (24,454)
  • +513 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 851 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLordZerraFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,149 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning65
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateLLLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · +64ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.0
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 47% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.5
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time554ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%−5.4%
first ⅓ avg 31.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 17 Aug →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · nuke, 16 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 14 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 17 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2915–1452%0.04
dust2A2715–1256%-0.00
ancientA149–564%0.02
cacheB115–645%0.03
nukeB84–450%-0.01
anubisD51–420%0.04
infernoA53–260%0.01
office—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

190Matches
57%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
86.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2572%1.2118.3
Dust22055%1.0715.4
Ancient1675%1.4718.1
Nuke862%1.0516.3
Cache4100%1.5420.5
Inferno367%3.0618.3
Overpass250%1.2025.0
Train1100%0.5811.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.4%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
73.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
563msReaction time
46.8%T opening success
63.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
10.31HE damage / grenade
3.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8257 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–130.0244%15 Oct →
anubis9–130.0638%15 Oct →
mirage10–130.0131%13 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0415%28 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0224%27 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0338%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0052%27 Sept →
ancient16–140.0919%26 Sept →
inferno13–160.0213%21 Sept →
anubis13–70.0819%21 Sept →
cache13–10.0833%21 Sept →
dust213–80.0432%21 Sept →
nuke15–150.0317%18 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0629%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0535%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.0620%17 Sept →
ancient14–160.0221%17 Sept →
cache10–130.0327%17 Sept →
mirage11–30.1127%17 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0215%16 Sept →
nuke0–3-0.090%16 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0731%16 Sept →
dust29–130.0130%15 Sept →
mirage13–90.1431%15 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0533%14 Sept →
nuke13–60.0425%10 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0227%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0221%9 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0343%7 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0126%7 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0212%6 Sept →
cache13–90.0519%6 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0324%3 Sept →
ancient13–100.0621%3 Sept →
dust213–90.0821%3 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0912%2 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0229%2 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0838%2 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0031%2 Sept →
dust213–40.1322%2 Sept →
mirage7–130.1336%2 Sept →
dust213–50.0325%1 Sept →
mirage13–40.1129%1 Sept →
ancient7–130.0431%31 Aug →
mirage13–60.0028%31 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0012%31 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0532%31 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0531%31 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0436%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0628%30 Aug →
mirage13–80.0116%27 Aug →
mirage6–130.0436%27 Aug →
cache13–80.1531%26 Aug →
office12–120.0521%24 Aug →
mirage11–130.0727%24 Aug →
dust213–30.1145%24 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0134%24 Aug →
inferno13–20.0265%24 Aug →
mirage4–130.0933%24 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0332%24 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0328%23 Aug →
mirage12–120.016%23 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0413%23 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0215%23 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0635%21 Aug →
mirage5–20.0046%21 Aug →
nuke13–100.0117%19 Aug →
mirage7–130.0022%18 Aug →
cache15–150.0332%18 Aug →
dust213–40.0250%18 Aug →
dust213–00.0036%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.0518%17 Aug →
nuke13–30.0220%17 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0231%17 Aug →
mirage13–50.1820%17 Aug →
ancient13–50.1022%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.0216%16 Aug →
nuke1–4-0.0367%16 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0328%16 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0358%16 Aug →
anubis9–130.0216%15 Aug →
dust213–50.0418%15 Aug →
mirage13–100.0119%15 Aug →
dust25–130.0242%15 Aug →
inferno13–110.0238%14 Aug →
inferno13–10.0733%14 Aug →
mirage13–00.1733%14 Aug →
cache13–100.0252%14 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0338%14 Aug →
anubis13–160.0415%13 Aug →
ancient13–100.1220%13 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0129%5 Aug →
cache13–100.0436%5 Aug →
mirage13–70.0636%5 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0533%5 Aug →
mirage15–150.0422%4 Aug →
dust213–160.0440%3 Aug →
mirage9–130.0150%3 Aug →
mirage13–50.0533%3 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0027%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.