andi

andi — CS2 Stats

FI76561197994225225[U:1:33959497]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,176Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,215Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,803Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53389 of 232116 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,318 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,803 +3,215 18 Jul18 Sept · 23 days played
18,58821,871peak 21,87118 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,318 +0 31 Aug7 Sept · 3 observations
1,3181,318peak 1,31831 Aug7 Sept
22,051Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,318Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,318
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 68 below peak (21,871)
  • +2,652 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,197 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.6%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy14.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.061.07meets
Match win rate42.7%46.3%46.9%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGandiFACEITLevel 8 · 1,318 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,803 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,318csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning44
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 27% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time558ms−108ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+6.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 6 Sept
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 5 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · anubis, 5 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB1991047%-0.04
dust2B179853%-0.04
infernoC156940%-0.03
ancientC145936%-0.03
anubisA127558%0.01
mirageA116555%-0.03
cacheC94544%-0.03
train2020%-0.06
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

259,443Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11,202Matches
42.7%Match win rate
51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
19,658MVPs
5,290Hours (in match)
8,212Bombs planted
1,922Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47108,875
AWP19,240
MP99,880
MAC-106,499
UMP-456,147
FAMAS5,152

Lifetime map wins

18,341dust2
13,234inferno
9,886train
9,750nuke
2,844vertigo
2,530cbble
266office
139aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

346Matches
60%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
61.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke5565%0.8210.8
Ancient5461%0.7911.9
Dust24865%0.8411.8
Anubis4757%0.8111.6
Inferno4060%0.729.4
Mirage3339%0.6310.2
Vertigo771%0.5610.3
Overpass560%0.7412.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
563msReaction time
47.6%T opening success
27.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
7.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.1944% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0315%20 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0816%20 Sept
cache13–11-0.0224%20 Sept
dust210–13-0.1213%20 Sept
nuke1–7-0.019%18 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0419%18 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0528%13 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0315%13 Sept
anubis10–130.0516%13 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0312%13 Sept
ancient1–20.1130%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0627%13 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0011%12 Sept
dust213–6-0.0121%12 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0712%11 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0816%11 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0314%11 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0516%11 Sept
dust213–7-0.0322%11 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0130%11 Sept
ancient9–13-0.049%9 Sept
anubis13–50.1121%9 Sept
inferno13–20.0333%6 Sept
dust25–13-0.0635%6 Sept
mirage11–130.0414%6 Sept
dust28–13-0.0726%6 Sept
inferno13–20.1731%6 Sept
inferno5–130.0327%5 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0714%5 Sept
anubis7–10.0225%5 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0623%5 Sept
dust213–100.0141%5 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0121%4 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0320%4 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0315%4 Sept
anubis13–110.048%4 Sept
nuke2–13-0.1027%4 Sept
dust25–13-0.0216%4 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0710%4 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0424%2 Sept
dust211–13-0.0419%30 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0539%30 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0023%29 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0620%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0513%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0117%28 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0412%27 Aug
dust213–4-0.0331%27 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0711%22 Aug
cache13–60.0214%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.057%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.078%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0013%22 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0419%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0323%22 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1021%21 Aug
anubis13–20.0017%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0518%21 Aug
nuke13–10.1031%21 Aug
mirage2–5-0.0515%15 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0518%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.0320%15 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1217%15 Aug
cache6–13-0.019%15 Aug
dust213–4-0.0719%15 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0117%15 Aug
cache9–13-0.0610%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0713%14 Aug
dust213–10.0421%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.105%14 Aug
cache10–13-0.1110%14 Aug
train12–12-0.0515%14 Aug
train10–13-0.0724%14 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0810%8 Aug
nuke7–13-0.1212%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0515%8 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0211%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0618%8 Aug
anubis13–90.0814%8 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0426%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.078%7 Aug
anubis13–50.0020%7 Aug
dust213–30.058%7 Aug
inferno13–11-0.057%7 Aug
nuke11–13-0.064%5 Aug
inferno13–1-0.0214%5 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1017%1 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0118%1 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0311%25 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0210%25 Jul
inferno2–13-0.105%25 Jul
dust213–8-0.0320%24 Jul
cache10–13-0.0213%24 Jul
ancient8–13-0.1011%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0321%18 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0816%18 Jul
nuke6–130.0016%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0118%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0115%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.1013%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →